God + Allah = ?

[ShaSha1]

(09-01-2013 02:57 PM)Logisch Wrote:  Neither, because we have nothing to prove they exist. As Chas said, it's a meaningless equation.

So, God + Allah = there is nothing. Am I right?

[DLJ]

(09-01-2013 11:27 PM)ShaSha1 Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 02:57 PM)Logisch Wrote:  Neither, because we have nothing to prove they exist. As Chas said, it's a meaningless equation.

So, God + Allah = there is nothing. Am I right?

and if you are right... then what? What's your point?

[ShaSha1]

(10-01-2013 12:09 AM)DLJ Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 11:27 PM)ShaSha1 Wrote:  So, God + Allah = there is nothing. Am I right?

and if you are right... then what? What's your point?

As I am doubting my realization, I have dropped the topic.

[ShaSha1]

(09-01-2013 11:26 AM)Chas Wrote:  The equation is meaningless.

Of course, it's a meaningful question.

[GirlyMan]

(09-01-2013 10:00 AM)ShaSha1 Wrote:  It is a Drishtantoist question. Drishtantoism, established by Shobuj
Taposh, follows the equation: God + Allah = there is nothing, though
theist and atheist will/may say that the equation is the crop of bizarre
thought and God+ Allah= 0 respectively. To say mathematically, God +
God = 2God (If Allah = God), or Allah + Allah = 2Allah (If God = Allah),
and to say synthetically it might be ‘God + Allah = Gallohad’. But
Allah cannot be God. It is believed that Allah has sent The Koran, and
God has sent the Bible. If the Quran and the Bible are not the same
matter, God is not equal to Allah. So God + Allah = there is nothing
(‘nothing’ not amounting to 0). Moreover, because of being a number, the
sum total of the two may not be 0. Again God ≠ Allah. Because all the
Christians do not regard the Koran, do not believe Allah; and hence do
not maintain the Eid festivals. In reverse order, all the Muslims do not
regard the Bible, do not believe God; and hence do not maintain the
Christmas Day. For this, Drishtantoism doesn’t give importance to any
divine/Godly matter.

God + Allah = there is nothing. Is the equation right or true?

Is that you msbiljanica?

[Chas]

(12-01-2013 03:57 AM)ShaSha1 Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 11:26 AM)Chas Wrote:  The equation is meaningless.

Of course, it's a meaningful question.

No, it's not.

[Logisch]

(12-01-2013 11:29 AM)GirlyMan Wrote:  

(09-01-2013 10:00 AM)ShaSha1 Wrote:  It is a Drishtantoist question. Drishtantoism, established by Shobuj
Taposh, follows the equation: God + Allah = there is nothing, though
theist and atheist will/may say that the equation is the crop of bizarre
thought and God+ Allah= 0 respectively. To say mathematically, God +
God = 2God (If Allah = God), or Allah + Allah = 2Allah (If God = Allah),
and to say synthetically it might be ‘God + Allah = Gallohad’. But
Allah cannot be God. It is believed that Allah has sent The Koran, and
God has sent the Bible. If the Quran and the Bible are not the same
matter, God is not equal to Allah. So God + Allah = there is nothing
(‘nothing’ not amounting to 0). Moreover, because of being a number, the
sum total of the two may not be 0. Again God ≠ Allah. Because all the
Christians do not regard the Koran, do not believe Allah; and hence do
not maintain the Eid festivals. In reverse order, all the Muslims do not
regard the Bible, do not believe God; and hence do not maintain the
Christmas Day. For this, Drishtantoism doesn’t give importance to any
divine/Godly matter.

God + Allah = there is nothing. Is the equation right or true?

Is that you msbiljanica?

I have a mathematician friend... the way they think about things is sometimes odd to me. Seeing them talk to someone who is a physics major is even more interesting. They both look at the same thing and draw entirely different conclusions, entirely different leaps and when when it comes to thinks like infinity it becomes a fuck all mindfuck with hands tossing in the air and finally, "WHAT the FUCK?" for both of them. Highly entertaining.

I often wonder if it's because if your primary concentration on math is to look for the answer of an equation or being bound to limitations of equations and when you propose something out of the ordinary that doesn't always line up with the math it because a mind boggling thing to consider. If you're used to physics and possibilities and things changing then you just use a more simple method of math to explain it (as I've found a few of my friends like keeping it as simple as possible) but proposing something that's out of the norm or strange to them is more invigorating and they entertain the possibilities. Whereas my mathematician friend will toss his hands up and go, "no."

Just an observation I've seen between them lol.

[Birdguy1979]

It equals 2 well constructed lies that are soon to become one.

[Hamata k]

(13-01-2013 01:07 AM)Birdguy1979 Wrote:  It equals 2 well constructed lies that are soon to become one.

Well constructed? WELL CONSTRUCTED!? My ass well constructed! No. Well constructed is something that is difficult to to prove wrong. Well constructed doesn't have more holes than a plane flying through flak fire.

[Free Thought]

(13-01-2013 02:00 AM)Hamata k Wrote:  

(13-01-2013 01:07 AM)Birdguy1979 Wrote:  It equals 2 well constructed lies that are soon to become one.

Well constructed? WELL CONSTRUCTED!? My ass well constructed! No. Well constructed is something that is difficult to to prove wrong. Well constructed doesn't have more holes than a plane flying through flak fire.

There are well enough constructed to be used as possibly two of the most reliable indoctrination tools in history.