God is Dead - Now what?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
31-01-2011, 05:48 PM
 
God is Dead - Now what?
Great article from ABC Australia

http://www.abc.net.au/religion/articles/...ome&topic2

TEXT BELOW;

GOD IS DEAD. NOW WHAT?
By Tim Dean
ABC RELIGION AND ETHICS | 1 FEB 2011

ATHEISM IS JUST THE BEGINNING. IT'S WHAT COMES AFTER GOD THAT WILL LAY THE PATH TO A FUTURE GOVERNED BY RATIONAL, SECULAR PRINCIPLES.

Let's say Richard Dawkins and his compatriots are right: there is no God. Is that it? End of story? Unfortunately, no.

Even if the so-called "New Atheists" are right, and all that's left of God is a chalk outline, that's far from the end of the story. Sadly, religion can't simply be surgically extracted from our lives, our culture and our society that easily. God's absence leaves a sizable void that needs to be filled by something. And atheism isn't it.

Now, I should flag up front that, as a rule, I no longer engage in the debate about whether God exists or not. He doesn't. And I'm as confident of that fact as I am that the Earth is round and that table manners are in sharp decline in the modern world.

I don't bother arguing about whether God exists anymore simply because there is already an overwhelming abundance of compelling arguments that not only convincingly state the reasons why it's vanishingly unlikely there is an Almighty, but the that also explain humans have been so consistently mistaken in believing there is one.

If someone is unpersuaded by these well worn arguments, further rational bludgeoning by myself is unlikely to sway their views. Simply reiterating these arguments would be a waste of both of our time.

In fact, I find it troubling that so many words are spilt, and so many hours burnt, in fruitless toil over the debate about the existence of God. So many able minds that could be turning their attention to a vastly more important question: what comes after God?

This is a question that demands far more attention than it gets, particularly from those who have already rejected the supernatural but are too busy shouting into the void of faith, such as the New Atheists.
It's important because, for many people, abandoning God means also turning one's back on the church. And doing so doesn't come without a cost.

Religion is more than just a vehicle of worship. Religion is one of the pillars of our society. Religion is a glue that binds a community together. It's a support network that lifts you when you're down. It's a centre of education, a hub of culture, a place where we're encouraged to consider things greater than our own petty concerns.

Consider that with the retreat of religion and community many people have withdrawn into a more insular, more individualistic, more hedonistic world of consumerism and vain achievement.

Yet, in this age of unbridled freedom of expression and unprecedented wealth, we're less happy now than we were fifty years ago. Today's so-called "epidemics" of obesity, anxiety, depression and suicide have all been linked to our ruthlessly competitive, individualistic and often isolating culture.

Many people simply aren't willing to abandon religion entirely, even if they harbour feelings of doubt or ambivalence over the existence of God. And the rise of evangelical strains of religion suggests there are many who are willing to turn their back on empty individualism in favour of being a part of a movement that seeks to elevate rather than isolate.

This is not to say that religion wasn't without its ills. There's no question that religion could also be stifling, repressive, dogmatic, authoritarian and intolerant of individual expression or dissent. And, of course, that its teachings hinge on a fiction.

But there's little question that religion played a pivotal role in our culture, as it did in every other culture throughout history. Abandoning religion, even with good cause, is not to be done lightly.

So with what to replace it? Atheism? Unfortunately, no. Atheism is fundamentally a negative thesis: it simply states that there is no God or gods. Atheism doesn't make any positive claims about how to live one's life, except to say that to do so under the impression there's a God is to live in error.

My beliefs about how to live well are no more defined by my atheism than my belief about how my day will unfold is informed by my disbelief in the tenets of astrology.

Science also isn't the answer - as much as people like Sam Harris would like it to be. Science tells us how the world is, but it doesn't tell us about how the world ought to be.

Certainly, once we agree on a set of values, science can inform us on how best to fulfil them, but science is necessarily silent on which fundamental values we ought to adopt. This means science is effectively silent on some of the biggest questions in morality and purpose.

Our current course of hedonistic individualism isn't the way forward. Many of us yearn for something greater than ourselves. And while the post-modern conquest of the late twentieth century made us each the arbiter of our own moral outlook, determining that moral outlook is a heavy burden to bear, and many of us yearn for moral guidance and leadership.
Self-help books, for all their good intentions, are a one-to-one affair that often reinforce the "you-can-do-it-if-you-try" meritocratic dogma that only leaves us even more deflated when we can't do it, even though we try.

What I suggest we need is a new institution (or institutions) to replace supernaturalist religion, one that takes from religion many of its beneficial cultural and community-building tools, but is based not on absent divinity but on solid, secular, naturalistic, rational, compassionate principles.
More than just secular morality, we need secular religion (whatever name it might go by - call it secular culture, if "religion" bothers you).
Sure, we already have Humanism. And yes, Humanism does embody many of the values I just mentioned. But Humanism is an ideology - and one spelt out in the language of reason - rather than a culture, an institution, a way of life.

Humanism might well evolve into a culture of sorts - and there are some, such as the Institute for Science and Human Values in the United States that are leaning that way - but it has a long way to go yet.
Secular religion needs to be more than just a list of dry principles. It needs to appeal to more than reason. It needs to engage, inspire and give insight, and build itself into a cultural institution that people can do more than just believe in, they need to be able to participate in it. If rational deliberation is the foundation, emotional engagement is the cathedral.

It should have branches everywhere. Have meetings every week. It should provide education, moral guidance, emotional support, social engagement. It should be a community centre, an academy, a marriage counselling service and a church, all in one. All without God looming.
This doesn't mean it can't also encourage worship, except it would be of the wonders of the natural world around us rather than an illusion of a world above.

If you've ever found yourself staring deep into the depths of the night sky, or marvelling at a panoramic mountain vista at dawn, or reeling at the contemplation of our genetic code, you know that nature can inspire elevation and a profound awareness that ours is but a bit part in the infinite span of this incredible, natural, world.

One crucial element would be that such a secular religion - or secular religions - would need to learn from history and from the folly of religions and ideologies that have come before.

It would need to practice tolerance - including of existing supernaturalist religions - if remaining insistent that it represents a better path.
It would also have to be pluralistic, allowing itself to adapt to local cultures and practices around the world, while stressing that in some matters there is very much a right and a wrong way to promote human well-being.

And like modern liberal democracy has learned to place checks and balances in the way of any slide towards autocracy, secular religion would need to employ checks and balances to prevent a slide into dogma.
This is no small task, but I believe there to be many ways it could be achieved. One possibility is what I call the Little Book of Answers and the Big Book of Questions approach.

The Little Book of Answers is what gives inspiration and day-to-day guidance. It's accessible, written in the language of poetry and parable. But behind every proclamation in the Little Book of Answers is a corresponding entry in the Big Book of Questions, replete with rational argument, evidence, discussion and debate.

Disagree with something in the Little Book of Answers? Turn to the Big Book of Questions. Still unsure? Engage in the debate. It's peer-reviewed Wiki-religion. With the right framework in place, secular religion could be inspiring, self-regulating and robust.

While I don't doubt this is a mammoth task, it's at least something that ought to be discussed. And as long as the God versus no-God debate continues ad nauseam, we're wasting valuable time discussing it.
And as for those of faith who are yet to be won over by atheists' arguments, perhaps the visible example of a working secular religion, with a clear and strong moral code, that is unambiguous in its contributions to well-being in the world will provide the emotional nudge that is lacking in cold rational argument.

Unlike the overtures of the increasingly militant and exclusivist atheist movement, it would warmly welcome "converts" with open arms.
Atheism is just the beginning. It's what comes after God that will lay the path to a future governed by rational, secular principles. And this is a discussion that's waiting to happen. Some of us just can't wait any longer.

Tim Dean is a science journalist and editor of Australian Life Scientist magazine. He is completing a PhD in philosophy at the University of NSW, researching the evolution of morality, and he blogs at Ockham's Beard. If you want to join in the discussion about secular morality and secular religion, you can email Tim at secular.morality@gmail.com.
Quote this message in a reply
31-01-2011, 06:01 PM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
You have to get the junkies off the heroin before you can even consider what else would better improve their lives. Step 1 is the only one that matters.

It's a silly question. People act like once society embraces atheism, we'll all just be wandering around in a haze, going "well now what?" Grab a christian and an atheist off the street and see if anyone can tell the difference between them. The only difference is that one chooses to watch football on Sunday and the other chooses to play with their imaginary friend.

Atheism becomes the new majority. Now what? Well. Take "In God We Trust" off the currency. Remove "under God" from the pledge of allegiance... both of which were added to the original in the 1950's. Remove creationism from the text books they have infected in schools. Stop wasting time praying and get off your knees and actually do something. Watch national IQ skyrocket.

"Ain't got no last words to say, yellow streak right up my spine. The gun in my mouth was real and the taste blew my mind."

"We see you cry. We turn your head. Then we slap your face. We see you try. We see you fail. Some things never change."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-01-2011, 07:43 PM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
There are so many holes in this piece that I scarcely know where to begin. First, let me just say that unless he is writing to a religious reader, there is little point in noting that atheism is not a philosophy. Theists may not get that, but atheists do. But if he is writing to a theisitic audience, he needs to recognize the need to advance atheistic "belief" first, and he skips right over that.

Second, arguing that disbelief in God or gods leaves a hole because it removes "religion" also fails because there is Jainism and Buddhism already filling that gap for some while pantheism and humanism (which he mischaracterized) do it for others.

Thirdly, even WITH belief in god, there is multi-culturalism and globalist philosophy and worldview.

Fourthly, we're no where near eradicating religion or god belief from the planet, so what's the point of worrying that humanism is under-developed?

Fifthly, religion means dogma. Not only is it impossible to have atheism that's dogmatic, it's equally impossible to have secularistic dogma since the foundation of secularism is inclusion which is anathematic to dogma. So to talk about secularist religion is is like trying to talk about dry wetness.

So there.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-01-2011, 08:11 PM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
Science DOES have guidelines about what the world "ought to be" and they are a hell of a lot better that what religion has to offer. (ie. "Stop polluting because future generations will have to clean up our mess" as opposed to "who cares, the rapture is upon us.") As for religion being a pillar in society, it has been shown that secular dominated societies are better than religious dominated ones.

We need better representatives than that guy. Tell him he's fired.

When I find myself in times of trouble, Richard Dawkins comes to me, speaking words of reason, now I see, now I see.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-01-2011, 10:26 PM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
I think he has 2 good points though, even if theyre only implied. People need a clear support system. And the many of the people I see in the masses are much too lazy to want to learn much of anything from science and reason. I think if you examine the habits of church goers you will find a large part of their motivation is social. People want more than forums, they want concrete friends that they know and canshake hands with. A sense of belonging. I've mulled this over for a year trying to think of a way to start an atheist group. I think it would really help.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
31-01-2011, 11:02 PM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
(31-01-2011 05:48 PM)Kayshadog Wrote:  GOD IS DEAD. NOW WHAT?

[Image: 15oyqnc.jpg]

All that hate's gonna burn you up, kid.
-- It keeps me warm.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
01-02-2011, 06:55 AM
 
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
Interesting article but the more I got into it, the more I felt he was trying to convert me into something. Tongue

If people are lonely, GET A HOBBY. Join a sports team, join a photography, art or literature groups. Get involved in a band or choir, music is a beautiful thing (one of the most uplifting things of going to a church in fact).

A little while ago I wondered what it would be like if all the many churches were abandoned from religious services. What could the buildings be used for? They are beautiful places with much potential. It would be great to use them for theater, music, lectures for various interests, and so on. Schools could use them as an inspirational place for academic extra curricular activities, away from the boredom of a classroom-and perhaps the government could help pay for it. I think there is alot of untapped future potential!

I agree that there is (or will increasingly be) a huge problem with people's social well being. I feel like I'm the perfect example, technology hasn't helped me being an introvert, but i am happy spending my leisure hours with my wife and cats. It's not that lack of religion is to blame for an individualistic way of life, but rather how technology has both connected and isolated us, but that is a topic for another discussion.

God is dead, now what?-no... God is dead, so what? Sleepy
Quote this message in a reply
06-02-2011, 08:12 AM
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
I think I know what this man's problem is

Religion has overly organised society in the last 2000 years. For almost every important phase in your life you went to a matching religious gathering. Celebrating birth, celebrating a passing, celebrating marriage, death. On Sunday you would gather around your favourite religious symbol and meet peers.

This is what I miss the most about religion. although i 've never went to church on sunday for the last 20 years or so, i do miss the instant celebretions you could organise. Feel free to call me a hipocrite. However, i knew that, in becoming an atheist, I would not make it easyer an I have to leave a lot of my oranised life behind me.

I feel that as void.

the list of thing I am happy to leave behind is however much longer...
Boredom in church
hypocrisy
hiding behind a bible
good/wrong thinking
unworthiness
...
..
.

Observer

Agnostic atheist
Secular humanist
Emotional rationalist
Disclaimer: Don’t mix the personal opinion above with the absolute and objective truth. Remember to think for yourself. Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-02-2011, 11:06 PM (This post was last modified: 06-02-2011 11:22 PM by Chesstime.)
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
Kayshadog said "So with what to replace it? Atheism? Unfortunately, no. Atheism is fundamentally a negative thesis: it simply states that there is no God or gods. Atheism doesn't make any positive claims about how to live one's life, except to say that to do so under the impression there's a God is to live in error."

Dear Kayshadog. I'm going to say something that you may find harsh; please understand it's because I simply Completely disagree with you or your news article.

Above is a small excerpt of your rather long winded speech From some News channel. Atheism is Not a replacement, nor BY Absolutely no means of any stretch of the imagination, A "thesis" Of ANY Kind! Let alone a negative one! In fact, It is the voice of reason and a move towards a higher intellect for our entire race! I'll go further by accusing you sir of trying to start a religion of your own!

The entire precept is false, even insulting. I could randomly take any part of your speech and feel just as insulted; perhaps even more insulted; as/than I feel by the sample above!Angry

The Beauty of The Scientific Method , is the Anticipation of a Better Explanation.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2011, 06:52 AM
 
RE: God is Dead - Now what?
(06-02-2011 08:12 AM)The_observer Wrote:  This is what I miss the most about religion. although i 've never went to church on sunday for the last 20 years or so, i do miss the instant celebretions you could organise. Feel free to call me a hipocrite. However, i knew that, in becoming an atheist, I would not make it easyer an I have to leave a lot of my oranised life behind me.

You are not a hypocrite, what you are saying could be taken as fact. Can going to church make you feel socially good and uplifting, sure! Doesn't make religion any more real though! I wish we could convert churches into community centers, places to play sports, senior centers (old people sit at home bored too much), places to play music (church acoustics are often unrivaled), I think there could be many great uses for churches and people could get together and socialize in their common interests.
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: