Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-07-2016, 01:47 AM
RE: Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex
Morningwood is so full of shit i'm can't tell if he's a sewage pipe a a manure truck or traditional values warrior broken record. Id say the third as the tend to cover there smell with flowery appeals to "but think of the children " But the stench creeps back eventually.

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-07-2016, 01:51 AM
RE: Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex
So it's not the governments job to decide what bathroom to use until it is consistency fail

There was no problem till there was a law needed to solve and none problem

Oh and his term biological sex is retarded

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-07-2016, 02:00 AM
RE: Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex
(14-07-2016 08:16 AM)epronovost Wrote:  I don't think the law makes it easier for sexual predator to enter bathrooms to peek on people. Public bathrooms are rarely, if ever, under surveillance by security services.

This is why bathroom laws are silly. We are not going to enforce them so what is the point?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Heywood Jahblome's post
19-07-2016, 06:29 AM
RE: Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex
(19-07-2016 02:00 AM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(14-07-2016 08:16 AM)epronovost Wrote:  I don't think the law makes it easier for sexual predator to enter bathrooms to peek on people. Public bathrooms are rarely, if ever, under surveillance by security services.

This is why bathroom laws are silly. We are not going to enforce them so what is the point?

The only thing that makes sexual segregation work when it comes to bathrooms is tradition and force of habit (much more than law). We have segregated sex in bathrooms for a little bit over a century in public space. It has become a convention. Even if you were to remove the bathroom signs, chances are that it wouldn't take long for bathrooms to be segregated again simply by people perpetuating the system for a while before it would disappear. The only thing the new law changes is that it's a form of official recognition that transexual (and intersex people for that matter) have been completly ignored by this segregation and have sufferred from its concequences. It offers them a cheap solution that most of them already used «illegaly». The important thing for them is to finally have one their issue adressed on the national level and reminded to the general public who is the fact that they exist and don't intent to hide forever. This positive recognition has much more worth for trans and intersex people than bathroom legislation.

Freedom is servitude to justice and intellectual honesty.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes epronovost's post
06-12-2016, 12:29 PM
RE: Heywood thoughts about transgendered folk using shitters not of thier bioligical sex



#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like GirlyMan's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: