Historical Science vs. Observational Science
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-01-2015, 01:48 PM
RE: Historical Science vs. Observational Science
(06-01-2015 05:53 AM)morondog Wrote:  
(06-01-2015 05:34 AM)Metazoa Zeke Wrote:  If I had a nickel. The argument used is not how it is worded. What he is going for is not people today, but people period. To him god is the ultimate witness, there for god was there to see him self create the earth for ham. So the question can't be used on him because he does claims to have a witness.

And can't produce the witness either Drinking Beverage

Well of course, it comes down to evidence, but ken can't win that game.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: