|
I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
|
|
|
|
|
19-07-2012, 03:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
Need useful sources, and all possible, easiest way to explain the method.please help, I expect he would want an easy way to explain, and I don't have an easy way to explain it.
![]() Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist. |
||||
|
19-07-2012, 03:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
(19-07-2012 03:18 PM)Atothetheist Wrote: Need useful sources, and all possible, easiest way to explain the method.please help, I expect he would want an easy way to explain, and I don't have an easy way to explain it. Radiometric dating: the radioactive element has a measurable half-life.
|
||||
|
19-07-2012, 03:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
There you go: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating
|
||||
|
19-07-2012, 05:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-07-2012 06:37 PM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
the "Curve of Knowns"
http://www.c14dating.com/int.html Empirical data for a vast range of radionuclides now exists. Kaye & Laby's Tables of Physical & Chemical Constants, devised and maintained by the National Physical Laboratory in the UK, contains among the voluminous sets of data produced by the precise laboratory work of various scientists a complete table of the nuclides, which due to its huge size, is split into sections to make it more manageable, in which data such as half-life, major emissions, emission energies and other useful data are included. The sections are: [1] Hydrogen to Flourine [2] Neon to Potassium [3] Calcium to Copper [4] Zinc to Yttrium [5] Zirconium to Indium [6] Tin to Praesodymium [7] Neodymium to Thulium [8] Ytterbium to gold [9] Mercury to Actinium [10] Thorium to Einsteinium [11] Fermium to Roentgenium (name not yet officially recognised by IUPAC) Discussion of above here : http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/vi...184#269184 http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/ev...ocks.shtml http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Feature..._IceCores/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geochronology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_meth...rchaeology http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_dating http://aigbusted.blogspot.com/2007/09/hu...young.html http://www.reduciblycomplex.com/index.ph...-debunked/ http://home.earthlink.net/~ironmen/qumran5.htm http://www.harvardhouse.com/Gabriel-to-D...Method.htm http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/creat...html#prove http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/hovind/howgood-c14.html http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/educat...teach.html http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/Learning.html http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/fosrec/McKinney.html http://www.acad.carleton.edu/curricular/...gback.html http://www.acad.carleton.edu/curricular/...index.html http://letterstocreationists.wordpress.com/stan-3/ http://debatingchristianity.com/forum/vi...184#269184 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/201...161307.htm There are multiple methods used all of which give answers in about the same range. (When you're dealing with ages in billions of years being off by a million or three is a small percentage). The Earth is estimated to be about 4.6 billion years old. These methods include: Radiocarbon dating Potassium-Argon dating Uranium-Lead dating. All of these relate a known, relatively constant rate of decay of a radioactive isotope. They're not affected by external factors such as temperature, pressure, etc. There are other dating methods as well that can be used to establish that the age of the Earth is WELL over anything the Creationists are proposing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geologic_ti… http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric… http://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creat...-14-dating Knock yourself out, badass.
Insufferable know-it-all. Apocalypse : pretty soon / Apprentice woologist in training.
|
||||
1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post |
|
19-07-2012, 05:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
Just say, "I know you are, but what am I?"
Helps me win about 85% of every debate I've ever been in. "Some of you are really douchey. Like douchey beyond the crimes of several degress of douchebaggery. Not all of you, but a good collective." ...Forum Member itsFerdinand |
||||
|
19-07-2012, 06:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
(19-07-2012 05:53 PM)Erxomai Wrote: Just say, "I know you are, but what am I?"I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
|
||||
|
19-07-2012, 06:07 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
(19-07-2012 06:02 PM)kingschosen Wrote:That's a good one too, but I usually wait to make that my final coup de grâce.(19-07-2012 05:53 PM)Erxomai Wrote: Just say, "I know you are, but what am I?"I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
"Some of you are really douchey. Like douchey beyond the crimes of several degress of douchebaggery. Not all of you, but a good collective." ...Forum Member itsFerdinand |
||||
|
19-07-2012, 06:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
(19-07-2012 06:07 PM)Erxomai Wrote:(19-07-2012 06:02 PM)kingschosen Wrote: I'm rubber, you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.That's a good one too, but I usually wait to make that my final coup de grâce.
|
||||
1 user Likes kingschosen's post |
|
19-07-2012, 06:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
I think Bucky handled that... so!
Can't be older than twelve. Cause that's when my Gwynnies made me, and we all know there ain't nothing before I. Oh yeah! What a bunch of adults, Erxy, KC....
|
||||
|
19-07-2012, 06:35 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: I am in an official one v one debate with a creationist over the earth's age.
(19-07-2012 06:29 PM)houseofcantor Wrote: I think Bucky handled that... so!Ya know you've been here too long when it takes 10 minutes to find something ya did 9 months ago.
Insufferable know-it-all. Apocalypse : pretty soon / Apprentice woologist in training.
|
||||
1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| The Big Think Creationism debate | TheBeardedDude | 7 | 374 |
08-04-2013 01:54 AM Last Post: Diogenes of Mayberry |
|
| The Rev's essay: Why I don't Teach My Children Young Earth Creationism | kingschosen | 3 | 376 |
19-10-2012 04:34 PM Last Post: Chas |
|
| grrrrr - got to vent about a creationist group in texas | Debzilla | 15 | 802 |
08-06-2012 03:21 AM Last Post: Filox |
|
| Total Earth's Population and a lonely God. | LadyJane | 12 | 953 |
29-02-2012 08:41 AM Last Post: Shannow |
|
| Creationist Articles... | Azaraith | 4 | 426 |
21-02-2012 06:31 PM Last Post: impr0vise |
|
| Why is it that creationist are trying to disprove evolution | digitali | 40 | 3,345 |
16-11-2011 04:39 AM Last Post: mysticjbyrd |
|
| Twilight Sparkle reacts to a Creationist | Paleo | 2 | 1,034 |
15-09-2011 09:24 PM Last Post: Paleo |
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


![[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]](http://i1266.photobucket.com/albums/jj538/atothetheist/0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757-000001DEF39CC8C5_zpsf4cc3639.jpg)



![[+]](images/night/collapse_collapsed.gif)


Apocalypse : pretty soon / Apprentice woologist in training.
