I will debate any atheist on here
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-02-2015, 12:37 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:31 PM)DLJ Wrote:  I am an atheist.

I would like to debate on which is the best variety of potato to use for traditional vinaigrette-based potato salad.

Thanks.

Go to any reservation and I am quite sure you will find an Indian tribe out there that believes in potato gods.

See, I may not be able to engage in that kind of subject, but the least I can do is point you in the right direction.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2015, 12:39 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:33 PM)Chas Wrote:  Sorry, no. There is no evidence corroborating your Bible stories.

There is plenty of evidence for me and the rest of the billions of Christians in this world.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2015, 12:40 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:31 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:23 PM)One Above All Wrote:  Provide a single, fallacy-free, logically and reality consistent argument for the existence of your particular god that doesn't apply to every other god.
I won't hold my breath.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

That was easy. I hope the tasks will get tougher as we go along.

Jesus never existed. There is no evidence he ever did. Even Christian seminary professors and scholars argue about the meaning of "resurrection". There is no consensus even among Christian scholars.
Oops. Fail.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/95508...surrection
The fact is, you are more than likely INCOMPETENT to even begin to discuss the topic. Provide me with you academic credentials, and THEN I will decide if you're worth wasting my time over.
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...other-look

(I sure hope you're not a follower of that fool Gary Habermas?)
If you are not schooled in Greek and Archaic Hebrew, don't even think about wasting my time.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Bucky Ball's post
08-02-2015, 12:42 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:35 PM)Anjele Wrote:  -note to self-

Historicity is capitalized cause it's more important that way.

*carry on*

Girl_nails

Yeah, because for example, if I was talking about the historical evidence for thethinkingatheist' poster Anjele...I wouldn't place the "h" in caps, because it isn't that important..

But when I am talking about the Jesus Christ (God incarnate), then, my left pinky finger will go through extra lengths to tap the "caps lock" key, because Jesus is in fact more important.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2015, 12:42 PM (This post was last modified: 08-02-2015 12:49 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:31 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:23 PM)One Above All Wrote:  Provide a single, fallacy-free, logically and reality consistent argument for the existence of your particular god that doesn't apply to every other god.
I won't hold my breath.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

That was easy. I hope the tasks will get tougher as we go along.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Osiris is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Baal is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Melqart is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Adonis is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Dumuzi is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Asclepius is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Achilles is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

"When we say ... Jesus Christ, our teacher, was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended into heaven, we propose nothing different from what you believe regarding those whom you consider sons of Zeus." - Saint Justin

...

checkmate atheists.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 19 users Like GirlyMan's post
08-02-2015, 12:45 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:39 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:33 PM)Chas Wrote:  Sorry, no. There is no evidence corroborating your Bible stories.

There is plenty of evidence for me and the rest of the billions of Christians in this world.

What is the extra-Biblical evidence for the resurrection?

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
08-02-2015, 12:45 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:42 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:35 PM)Anjele Wrote:  -note to self-

Historicity is capitalized cause it's more important that way.

*carry on*

Girl_nails

Yeah, because for example, if I was talking about the historical evidence for thethinkingatheist' poster Anjele...I wouldn't place the "h" in caps, because it isn't that important..

But when I am talking about the Jesus Christ (God incarnate), then, my left pinky finger will go through extra lengths to tap the "caps lock" key, because Jesus is in fact more important.

[Image: GIF-Watch-out-we-got-a-bad-ass-over-here-GIFS.gif]

I am sure your god is impressed with the dexterity of your little finger.

See here they are the bruises some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF

We're all mad here. The Cheshire Cat
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 13 users Like Anjele's post
08-02-2015, 12:46 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:39 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:33 PM)Chas Wrote:  Sorry, no. There is no evidence corroborating your Bible stories.

There is plenty of evidence for me and the rest of the billions of Christians in this world.

Wow. I'm convinced. You're a really good 'bater Smile

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 11 users Like morondog's post
08-02-2015, 12:46 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:45 PM)Anjele Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:42 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  Yeah, because for example, if I was talking about the historical evidence for thethinkingatheist' poster Anjele...I wouldn't place the "h" in caps, because it isn't that important..

But when I am talking about the Jesus Christ (God incarnate), then, my left pinky finger will go through extra lengths to tap the "caps lock" key, because Jesus is in fact more important.

[Image: GIF-Watch-out-we-got-a-bad-ass-over-here-GIFS.gif]

I am sure your god is impressed with the dexterity of your little finger.

And the fact that he/she uses caps lock, rather than the much more convenient "shift" key.

The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 6 users Like One Above All's post
08-02-2015, 12:48 PM
RE: I will debate any atheist on here
(08-02-2015 12:42 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(08-02-2015 12:31 PM)Call_of_the_Wild Wrote:  The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

That was easy. I hope the tasks will get tougher as we go along.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Osiris is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Baal is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Melqart is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Adonis is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Dumuzi is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Asclepius is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Achilles is an argument that doesn't apply to any other God, and is fallacy-free.

...

checkmate atheists.

The argument based on the Historicity of the Resurrection of Jesus has bells on though.

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like morondog's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: