Is Science Progress?
Post Reply
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
21-12-2014, 12:31 PM
RE: Is Science Progress?
Seriously, this is nearly the same thing you've posted before. Please don't spam, you could have continued in the same thread you'd already created. Seems you learned nothing from the last one anyway... That's why people have to keep reminding you of what science actually is... You keep ignoring facts, and making your own decisions based on your irrational fears.

I hope that the world turns, and things get better. But what I hope most of all is that you understand what I mean when I tell you that, even though I do not know you, and even though I may never meet you, laugh with you, cry with you, or kiss you, I love you. With all my heart, I love you. - V for Vendetta
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Smercury44's post
21-12-2014, 01:35 PM
RE: Is Science Progress?
(21-12-2014 09:42 AM)Baba Bozo Wrote:  If that happens, will science still fairly be labeled progress?

(21-12-2014 11:39 AM)Baba Bozo Wrote:  Science is just a tool. We all agree on this. You don't need to remind us of that over and over again.

Sorry. Your bad.

(21-12-2014 11:39 AM)Baba Bozo Wrote:  Yes, doesn't it seem the tool of science should be focused on making humans less stoopid?

Yes. And that is what it does.

Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: