Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-10-2015, 04:58 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
What the hell?


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 02:56 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Well, guys, I have very much overestimated your brain potential. A shame. All
you are capable of is dully accusing me of incomprehension of both neo-darwinism
and evolution. And it is presumed that you, beloved, properly understand the
ussues in question. Why, isn't this laughable?
Frankly, I am perfectly indifferent as regards your enlightened opinions; what
can you say beyond stale banalities? Still I cherish the hope that, beside few
ignorant blowers, one or two thinking persons silently stand by here. They are
those whom I address. All the other are free to leave the meeting and to go on
understanding what they please. Meanwhile, I am to have done with worm-eaten
"modern synthesis".
As you see, the so-called theory of microevolution is just the unfunny anecdote.
The individual fitness is a phantom, in the world of sex, and Darwinian NS is
as well. The wicked irony of nature is that namely Darwinian natural selection
is lacking. Whereas other forms of NS, - that is, natural selection of alleles
and group selection - happily operate there. Anything you like - but for the very
Darwin's idea. That's the sporting life...
Still all this is only the thin edge to the wedge. The proper evolution begins
with speciation. And what does neo-darwinism know about speciation? At bottom,
near to nothing. “...The large-scale aspects of evolution remain unexplained,
including the origin of species”. (Brian Goodwin. How the Leopard Changed Its
Spots. The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton University Press, 2001, p. xii).
"...Including the origin of species” - this has been said 142 years hence the
first publication of the fabulous "On the Origin of Species..."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 03:14 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(09-10-2015 02:56 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  All you are capable of is dully accusing me of incomprehension of both neo-darwinism and evolution.

If you dislike this, perhaps you should consider actually reading up on the subject before posting nonsense.

As it is, repeating the same already-refuted nonsense and schoolyard insults does not impress.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Unbeliever's post
09-10-2015, 03:22 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Okay Vladimir what, may I ask, accounts for the animals we see today in regards to what we see left fossilized within the geological strata?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 03:54 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Dear Peebothuhul, read good literature - beyond neo-darwinist text-books. It considerably amplifies.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 04:08 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(09-10-2015 03:54 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  It considerably amplifies.

Are you under the impression that you are speaking coherent English?

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Unbeliever's post
09-10-2015, 04:12 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
English is my third ot fourth language. And still it is much more coherent than your native.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 04:15 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(09-10-2015 03:54 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Dear Peebothuhul, read good literature - beyond neo-darwinist text-books. It considerably amplifies.

That will be all well and good to garner said book's content.

It will not, however, get me any closer to knowing what it is that you think about/upon the subject.

So I ask again, though now using a more contemporary example, how do your ideas (When you detail them) account for monotremes, marsupials and placental mammals?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 04:19 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Have patience. Everything comes in due time.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2015, 05:58 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(09-10-2015 04:19 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Have patience. Everything comes in due time.

You're not even trying with your language skills any more in your replies.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: