Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
14-10-2015, 07:04 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(14-10-2015 02:48 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Yes, basketball players differ with their skills; if anynobody objects? The thing is that you can't break the final score down to the individual players - with all their skills. No way.

Well, yes. You can. It's just not practical or easy to do so.

Unfortunately for you, practicality and ease are not requirements for possibility. To suggest that there is a factor in play other than the individual players' abilities all interacting with each other is unwarranted and nonsensical.

(14-10-2015 02:48 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  In parallel, individuals surely differ with their viability, in the world of sex. Yet viability doesn't mean fitness! Say, a pair of lively piggies is, for some reason, infertile and so is biologically absolutely unfit. At that, mate the same individuals with some other piggies, and the pairs may prove fertile - and, therefore, quite fit. Comprenez-vous?

This actually supports the idea of individual fitness.

You do not understand what you are talking about.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Unbeliever's post
15-10-2015, 02:47 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Prior to my acquaintance with "modern synthesis", I couldn't imagine that such
a mash of crying ignorance and cynical story-telling might take place under the
hight roof of sciense. Yes, it does. A shame.
Sure, neo-darwinism is not a scientific theory. Moreover, it is not a theory
at all, and there is nothing in neo-darwinism to be falsified (by Karl Popper).
Neo-darwinism is merely a dull produce of the "minor XX century religious sect".
It is the primitive simulacrum of a theory preachified by cynical tricksters to
gullible simpletons. Would you like to be in the number of simpletons? Or do you
belong to the crew of ministers of religion, eh?
Ciao, you hapless worshippers of neo-darwinism, the enlightenment mission is
completed. No single glimmer of original thought has sparked in your countless
comments... Of course semi-literate Unbeliever is free to go on breaking system
results down to subsystems. Who cares? He is free to try and build a perpetual
motion machine as well. Little knowing is dangerous...
Do what you please, guys. Wind in your sails. Still you are going to learn the
lesson, whether you will or not. All the best.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 02:58 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(15-10-2015 02:47 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Prior to my acquaintance with "modern synthesis", I couldn't imagine that such
a mash of crying ignorance and cynical story-telling might take place under the
hight roof of sciense. Yes, it does. A shame.
Sure, neo-darwinism is not a scientific theory. Moreover, it is not a theory
at all, and there is nothing in neo-darwinism to be falsified (by Karl Popper).
Neo-darwinism is merely a dull produce of the "minor XX century religious sect".
It is the primitive simulacrum of a theory preachified by cynical tricksters to
gullible simpletons. Would you like to be in the number of simpletons? Or do you
belong to the crew of ministers of religion, eh?
Ciao, you hapless worshippers of neo-darwinism, the enlightenment mission is
completed. No single glimmer of original thought has sparked in your countless
comments... Of course semi-literate Unbeliever is free to go on breaking system
results down to subsystems. Who cares? He is free to try and build a perpetual
motion machine as well. Little knowing is dangerous...
Do what you please, guys. Wind in your sails. Still you are going to learn the
lesson, whether you will or not. All the best.


До моего знакомства с "современной синтеза", я не мог себе представить, что такое
месиво вопиющего невежества и циничного рассказа может занять место под
высота крыши Наука. Да, это так. Позор.
Конечно, нео-дарвинизм не научная теория. Кроме того, это не теория
на всех, и нет ничего в нео-дарвинизма, чтобы быть фальсифицированы (Карл Поппер).
Нео-дарвинизм является всего лишь тупой продукции о "религиозной секты незначительные ХХ века".
Это примитивный симулякр теории preachified циничных обманщиков от до
доверчивые простаки. Вы хотели бы быть в числе простаков? Или вы
принадлежат экипажа священнослужителями, а?
Ciao, вы несчастные поклонники нео-дарвинизма, просвещение миссия
завершена. Ни один проблеск мысли не оригинальной вызвала в ваш бесчисленное
комментарии ... Конечно малограмотные Неверующий волен идти на нарушения системы
Результаты до подсистем. Какая разница? Он свободен, чтобы попытаться построить вечный
движение машины, а также. Маленькая знание опасно ...
Делать то, что, пожалуйста, ребята. Ветер в паруса. Тем не менее вы собираетесь, чтобы узнать
Урок, будете ли вы или нет. Всего наилучшего.



Hey bitch-face, I can copy-paste Google translations too! Drinking Beverage

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 03:02 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(15-10-2015 02:47 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  ... 'Wrote' stuff....

Drinking Beverage

Well.. at least one person was getting their posts off....

Rolleyes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 03:17 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(15-10-2015 02:47 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Ciao, you hapless worshippers of neo-darwinism, the enlightenment mission is completed.

Oh. That's it, then?

A shame. I could have sworn you were going to make an actual point some time soon, rather than just rambling on about sympatric speciation and your complete lack of understanding of the concept of fitness.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-02-2017, 10:09 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Hi, guys! After all this time, let me report, further to earlier discussion, that the once plighted book humbly titled Evolution: from Mythology to Theory has been recently published at Amazon under the pen-name Anatoly Nikolaev. The e-book - see at

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N4V5Q0A/ref...+to+theory

- is offered all over the world away for free. It belongs to the pop-science genre, so “a splendid time is guaranteed...”
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-02-2017, 10:27 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(06-02-2017 10:09 PM)Vladimir Wrote:  Hi, guys! After all this time, let me report, further to earlier discussion, that the once plighted book humbly titled Evolution: from Mythology to Theory has been recently published at Amazon under the pen-name Anatoly Nikolaev. The e-book - see at

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N4V5Q0A/ref...+to+theory

- is offered all over the world away for free. It belongs to the pop-science genre, so “a splendid time is guaranteed...”

Mindless shill.

Learn some actual science, you moron. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Chas's post
06-02-2017, 10:27 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(06-02-2017 10:09 PM)Vladimir Wrote:  Hi, guys! After all this time, let me report, further to earlier discussion, that the once plighted book humbly titled Evolution: from Mythology to Theory has been recently published at Amazon under the pen-name Anatoly Nikolaev. The e-book - see at

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N4V5Q0A/ref...+to+theory

- is offered all over the world away for free. It belongs to the pop-science genre, so “a splendid time is guaranteed...”

Go away, or we shall taunt you a second time.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Unbeliever's post
06-02-2017, 10:46 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
I took a look at one page on Amazon.

It's grossly overpriced at "free" -- stodgy, condescending and convoluted, and no actual entertainment value. One would have to pay me to read it.

I'm sorry, but your beliefs are much too silly to take seriously. Got anything else we can discuss?
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Astreja's post
06-02-2017, 10:54 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
[Image: giphy-facebook_s.jpg]

Atheism is NOT a Religion. It's A Personal Relationship With Reality!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: