Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-02-2017, 11:47 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
It seems, local activists are unanimous: burn the book! crucify the author!
Attaboy, guys! Yet do remember: manuscripts do not burn... The book happily solds
all over the world. Kick yourself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-02-2017, 11:51 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
No, burning the book is too much work. Better to ignore it.

(Nice homage to The Master and Margarita with that "manuscripts do not burn" line, 'tho.)

I'm sorry, but your beliefs are much too silly to take seriously. Got anything else we can discuss?
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(06-02-2017 11:47 PM)Vladimir Wrote:  The book happily solds
all over the world.

Yes, yes, we're sure you're very proud of your three total sales.

We just don't care.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Unbeliever's post
07-02-2017, 01:58 AM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
[Image: ikOiq.gif]

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Banjo.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Banjo's post
07-02-2017, 10:08 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
Well, it is so gratifying to see as sterile morons suffer severe cognitive dissonance. Sharp envy, impotent spite and sputter... Ciao!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2017, 10:17 PM (This post was last modified: 07-02-2017 10:35 PM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(12-10-2015 03:09 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  Is it here a ladys literary coterie?

Indeed. You seem like a twat. You'll fit right in.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2017, 10:19 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(10-10-2015 02:55 AM)Vladimir Wrote:  <snip> Where are the spatial
barriers which secured the isolated uprise of all these innumerable species?

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/librar...52_03.html

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2017, 10:34 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(04-12-2012 11:56 AM)THEMAYAN Wrote:  This is nonsense. Even wiki has an article on this logical fallacy. The truth is that we have been finding out of place artifact for centuries, and they are either written off as hoaxes without further examination, or they are just considered one of life's mysteries or anomalies, and there are volumes of examples of this. Of course the people that write of these examples are of course called all kinds of childish names as you have done the same.

So.
Then you'll be publishing and collecting your Nobel then ?
Which major publication has agreed to publish your paper ?
Where is your PhD from ?

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2017, 11:23 PM
RE: Is neo-darwinism a scientific theory?
(07-02-2017 10:08 PM)Vladimir Wrote:  Well, it is so gratifying to see as sterile morons suffer severe cognitive dissonance. Sharp envy, impotent spite and sputter... Ciao!

He thinks that was envy and spite?

I clearly need to work on my "appalled disgust and disappointment at dumbass" facial expression.

How's this for "stutter", pal? You have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

The "spatial barrier" to which you refer appears to suggest that evolution only occurs allopatrically (in other areas), which is indeed one of the ways it happens, but sympatric (same region) speciation is also a thing. You have proposed a "challenge" to evolution that not only isn't something science has overlooked, but is actually something taught in first-year Introduction to Biology 101 at any university. That tells us that you haven't even taken the time to establish even the most rudimentary, most basic conceptual understanding of the subject you are attempting to criticize.

Do you also go onto political forums and ask "why do Libertarians like Socialists so much?", or onto a car forum and ask why they don't know that steam engines are too heavy to be efficient? They'd laugh at, mock, and deride you, there, too, for your failure to grasp basic definitions and principles of the subject before you criticized the subject in which many of them are experts. Likewise, we laugh at, mock, and deride you here for your basic failures.

It's pathetic. The delusion that we find your ideas to be a challenge of any sort, let alone something that your fantasies tell you leave us unable to do anything but insult and stutter, is even more pathetic.

Now take your delusional scorn and go peddle your bullshit somewhere else. Maybe you'll finally make that fourth sale to someone who's not related to you.

"Theology made no provision for evolution. The biblical authors had missed the most important revelation of all! Could it be that they were not really privy to the thoughts of God?" - E. O. Wilson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like RocketSurgeon76's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: