KC, you're a twit.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-11-2012, 01:30 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:21 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  
(19-11-2012 01:05 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  Strawman, good sir. I never said anything like that. I stated that Kingschosen is intellectually dishonest. I never addressed theism broadly, so stop acting as though I did. I also stated that I find both agnostic theism and deism to be two perfectly logical alternatives to the all-too specific theistic claims.
Alright, here we go again. Can you name me a theist you believe to be intellectually honest?

What purpose does attacking the individual serve rather than their arguments?

What purpose does a thread like this have except to insult someone?

Why does anyone else care about the personal squabbles of individual forum members?

There are several members I do not like, I have never felt the desire to start a thread insulting them, as it serves no purpose except to further my own narcissism. I have started threads to complain about types of people or particular ways in which people piss me off. So, if the point of the thread is to discuss intellectual honesty, then okay, there is a discussion to be had there. But if all anyone intends to do is back someone into a corner and call them names, then they are an asshole who has generated something that serves about as much intellectual purpose as the very thing they are complaining about.
I have already answered all of these questions.

[Image: Untitled-2.png?_subject_uid=322943157&am...Y7Dzq4lJog]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-11-2012, 01:32 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  
(19-11-2012 01:21 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  Alright, here we go again. Can you name me a theist you believe to be intellectually honest?

What purpose does attacking the individual serve rather than their arguments?

What purpose does a thread like this have except to insult someone?

Why does anyone else care about the personal squabbles of individual forum members?

There are several members I do not like, I have never felt the desire to start a thread insulting them, as it serves no purpose except to further my own narcissism. I have started threads to complain about types of people or particular ways in which people piss me off. So, if the point of the thread is to discuss intellectual honesty, then okay, there is a discussion to be had there. But if all anyone intends to do is back someone into a corner and call them names, then they are an asshole who has generated something that serves about as much intellectual purpose as the very thing they are complaining about.
I have already answered all of these questions.
Logica, you're a twit. Big Grin

[Image: klingon_zps7e68578a.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes houseofcantor's post
19-11-2012, 01:39 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:32 PM)houseofcantor Wrote:  
(19-11-2012 01:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  I have already answered all of these questions.
Logica, you're a twit. Big Grin
Now I KNOW that was a typo this time! Big Grin

It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness Laugh out load
~Izel
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Erxomai's post
19-11-2012, 01:40 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:21 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  Alright, here we go again. Can you name me a theist you believe to be intellectually honest?

Gandhi, maybe?

But then, who knows; how does one measure honesty?

***

Sounds as if you fellas all got your man pants in a bunch... I feel like I walked into a bar fight waiting to happen. I think I'll just back out of this steamy pile of a thread for now and maybe check in on the carnage later. Dodgy

A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes kim's post
19-11-2012, 01:43 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:40 PM)kim Wrote:  
(19-11-2012 01:21 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  Alright, here we go again. Can you name me a theist you believe to be intellectually honest?

Gandhi, maybe?

But then, who knows; how does one measure honesty?

***

Sounds as if you fellas all got your man pants in a bunch... I feel like I walked into a bar fight waiting to happen. I think I'll just back out of this steamy pile of a thread for now and maybe check in on the carnage later. Dodgy
Good. Bring the mop and bucket with you. It's your turn to straighten up after.

It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness Laugh out load
~Izel
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Erxomai's post
19-11-2012, 01:45 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
I don't know much of anything about Ghandi, but would anyone who asserts that they know anything with respect to a god be intellectually honest?

Logica
You do understand that while it is sometimes hard to separate a person from their beliefs, it is a necessity when trying to refute their points? Right? I have no problem saying that his rationale and discourse are intellectually dishonest because they are based off of faith and not logic or reason, but that was never the purpose of this thread (based off of the title and the original post). This thread was intended to be a good ol' fashioned insultfest directed at an individual because someone got their feelings hurt over a -2 attached to their name.

I am finding myself agreeing more and more with HoC, and I am scared about where this will lead. I suddenly feel like watching Iron Man...

“Science is simply common sense at its best, that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.”
—Thomas Henry Huxley
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like TheBeardedDude's post
19-11-2012, 01:47 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
[Image: aardvark-was-put-out-to-pasture.jpg] [Image: 6a010535647bf3970b01538e33ecf8970b-800wi.jpg]
[Image: aardvark.jpg]

It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness Laugh out load
~Izel
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Erxomai's post
19-11-2012, 02:04 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 01:45 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  I don't know much of anything about Ghandi, but would anyone who asserts that they know anything with respect to a god be intellectually honest?

Logica
You do understand that while it is sometimes hard to separate a person from their beliefs, it is a necessity when trying to refute their points? Right? I have no problem saying that his rationale and discourse are intellectually dishonest because they are based off of faith and not logic or reason, but that was never the purpose of this thread (based off of the title and the original post). This thread was intended to be a good ol' fashioned insultfest directed at an individual because someone got their feelings hurt over a -2 attached to their name.

I am finding myself agreeing more and more with HoC, and I am scared about where this will lead. I suddenly feel like watching Iron Man...
I understand these points in their entirety, and very rarely do I mean to offend Kingschosen himself (I say rarely because the last I debated with him, I did say that he was insane). I have to understand Chas' position though. Kingschosen's position is annoying, not because there is no way to refute it, but because he simply ignores any legitimate criticism, steps out of the way, or results to special pleading. It is frustrating, and often times I feel that KC is a twit. That's why I said I was with Chas.

Now, of course, being an asshole to our Satanist "brothers and sisters", I think it is all fine and dandy. Hell, being a dick is part of their cult. Wink

[Image: Untitled-2.png?_subject_uid=322943157&am...Y7Dzq4lJog]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Logica Humano's post
19-11-2012, 02:05 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
First of all.

Kc that was a stupid comment.

Second, Chas. You could have pulled him up about it in the thread where he posted it, or Even by PM. Creating a thread just to have a go at another member is really childish, Grow up!.

Behold the power of the force!
[Image: fgYtjtY.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes FSM_scot's post
19-11-2012, 02:16 PM
RE: KC, you're a twit.
(19-11-2012 02:04 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  
(19-11-2012 01:45 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  I don't know much of anything about Ghandi, but would anyone who asserts that they know anything with respect to a god be intellectually honest?

Logica
You do understand that while it is sometimes hard to separate a person from their beliefs, it is a necessity when trying to refute their points? Right? I have no problem saying that his rationale and discourse are intellectually dishonest because they are based off of faith and not logic or reason, but that was never the purpose of this thread (based off of the title and the original post). This thread was intended to be a good ol' fashioned insultfest directed at an individual because someone got their feelings hurt over a -2 attached to their name.

I am finding myself agreeing more and more with HoC, and I am scared about where this will lead. I suddenly feel like watching Iron Man...
I understand these points in their entirety, and very rarely do I mean to offend Kingschosen himself (I say rarely because the last I debated with him, I did say that he was insane). I have to understand Chas' position though. Kingschosen's position is annoying, not because there is no way to refute it, but because he simply ignores any legitimate criticism, steps out of the way, or results to special pleading. It is frustrating, and often times I feel that KC is a twit. That's why I said I was with Chas.

Now, of course, being an asshole to our Satanist "brothers and sisters", I think it is all fine and dandy. Hell, being a dick is part of their cult. Wink
Satanism is the biggest collection of narcissistic asshats I have ever heard of (basing this mainly off of Seth's podcast).

I don't disagree that the reasoning that KC uses is irrational, but I don't see the point in insulting KC (this is my point). I don't see how calling him a twit serves any purpose other than to be insulting, something I find to be fruitless.

That doesn't mean some people aren't idiots, dumbasses, narcissists, cock-suckers, douchebags, assholes, fuck-sticks, etc, etc. I just mean, spending your time raving about them serves no beneficial purpose. Well, it might allow you to blow off steam, but if that is the case, just open up a word document (or your preferred word processor) and have at it.

I do my ranting and raving during my daily walks. I cuss, insult, and berate people in my head as a means by which to blow off steam.

“Science is simply common sense at its best, that is, rigidly accurate in observation, and merciless to fallacy in logic.”
—Thomas Henry Huxley
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: