Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-11-2013, 01:21 PM
RE: Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
I've always thought that, along with Fosters lager and Yellow Tail wines, Ken Ham is one of our wiser export decisions.

-- Max

I came into this world screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I am not afraid to go out of it that way.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes nooneofconsequence's post
06-11-2013, 01:24 PM
RE: Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
I used to laugh at the Kiwi's (new zealanders) face palming over Ray Comfort.
But i think I need to double face palm over Ken "Embarrassment to australia" Ham

Theism is to believe what other people claim, Atheism is to ask "why should I".
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes sporehux's post
06-11-2013, 01:28 PM
RE: Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
(06-11-2013 01:24 PM)sporehux Wrote:  I used to laugh at the Kiwi's (new zealanders) face palming over Ray Comfort.
But i think I need to double face palm over Ken "Embarrassment to australia" Ham

Poor Ken. Hobo

Take some comfort (heh!) in the knowledge that the fucker is a Queenslander.

-- Max

I came into this world screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I am not afraid to go out of it that way.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-11-2013, 05:48 PM
Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
By the way, this was a great watch. I'd recommend it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-11-2013, 05:56 PM
RE: Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
Make it a drinking game, whenever someone holds their bible up to ordain their argument.

Theism is to believe what other people claim, Atheism is to ask "why should I".
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes sporehux's post
06-11-2013, 06:02 PM
Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
(06-11-2013 05:56 PM)sporehux Wrote:  Make it a drinking game, whenever someone holds their bible up to ordain their argument.

Ha!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-11-2013, 07:47 PM
RE: Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
I loved it when Ham basically called the astrophysicist a non-believer because he believes the universe is billions years old. Yeah, we need more of this...because later the astrophysicist talked about proving the origins of earliest life by digging on the moon and finding fossils of of the first life blown there from earth from asteroids hitting our planet. He expects it show fully formed species signalling a creator..

So, yes...we need more of this type of argument from these people. Because it shows how insanely crazy they are.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Momsurroundedbyboys's post
06-11-2013, 08:07 PM
Ken Ham vs Hugh Ross (Creationist Awkwardness)
Exactly what I was thinking!!!!



(06-11-2013 07:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  I loved it when Ham basically called the astrophysicist a non-believer because he believes the universe is billions years old. Yeah, we need more of this...because later the astrophysicist talked about proving the origins of earliest life by digging on the moon and finding fossils of of the first life blown there from earth from asteroids hitting our planet. He expects it show fully formed species signalling a creator..

So, yes...we need more of this type of argument from these people. Because it shows how insanely crazy they are.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: