KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
Thread Closed 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-01-2013, 01:16 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 01:02 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 12:59 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This really isn't much of a debate (not like the soul thing), plus I've already beat this horse to death.

But, I guess I accept.

Also, I will be doing A).

I will be defending the existence of an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotence Christian God.

How exactly does this work? Do he ask me a question or something?


Sounds like a deal! You go first.

Cool story, bro. Drinking Beverage
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
08-01-2013, 01:26 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
Kingsy: god

RIED: no god

THE END
***



Well, at least it's time for lunch. Smile

I think in the end, I just feel like I'm a secular person who has a skeptical eye toward any extraordinary claim, carefully examining any extraordinary evidence before jumping to conclusions. ~ Eric ~ My friend ... who figured it out.
Find all posts by this user
[+] 6 users Like kim's post
08-01-2013, 01:52 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 01:16 PM)Refuting_Ignorance_Every_Day Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 01:02 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  Also, I will be doing A).

I will be defending the existence of an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotence Christian God.

How exactly does this work? Do he ask me a question or something?


Sounds like a deal! You go first.
Wait, what?

I'm not trying to debate you on the non-existence of God. You're debating me on the existence of God.

You have to go first and you hold the burden of proof.

[Image: vjp09.gif]
Find all posts by this user
08-01-2013, 01:56 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 01:52 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 01:16 PM)Refuting_Ignorance_Every_Day Wrote:  Sounds like a deal! You go first.
Wait, what?

I'm not trying to debate you on the non-existence of God. You're debating me on the existence of God.

You have to go first and you hold the burden of proof.


Yes, he goes first because he's the challenger.

No, you both hold the burden of evidence equally.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
[+] 4 users Like Chas's post
08-01-2013, 02:03 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
Wait, challenger goes first I agree with, but evidence can't be on the "doesn't exist" argument since there is no evidence for non-existence. Teapot. Unicorns. Been there, said that. So I'm not sure how they share that burden equally.

"Whores perform the same function as priests, but far more thoroughly." - Robert A. Heinlein
Find all posts by this user
[+] 1 user Likes Aseptic Skeptic's post
08-01-2013, 02:07 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 02:03 PM)Aseptic Skeptic Wrote:  Wait, challenger goes first I agree with, but evidence can't be on the "doesn't exist" argument since there is no evidence for non-existence. Teapot. Unicorns. Been there, said that. So I'm not sure how they share that burden equally.
It's a "Debate on the Existence of God". kc has the pro, ried has the con. Equal burdens.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
08-01-2013, 02:15 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
JebusFuck, did I just take a handful of crazy pills or are we now debating how to debate? Blink

I think in the end, I just feel like I'm a secular person who has a skeptical eye toward any extraordinary claim, carefully examining any extraordinary evidence before jumping to conclusions. ~ Eric ~ My friend ... who figured it out.
Find all posts by this user
[+] 2 users Like kim's post
08-01-2013, 02:15 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 02:07 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(08-01-2013 02:03 PM)Aseptic Skeptic Wrote:  Wait, challenger goes first I agree with, but evidence can't be on the "doesn't exist" argument since there is no evidence for non-existence. Teapot. Unicorns. Been there, said that. So I'm not sure how they share that burden equally.
It's a "Debate on the Existence of God". kc has the pro, ried has the con. Equal burdens.
Zactly. If KC came to me and said, "Hey Stark. God exists." My response would be, "well, you just made a claim, so back it up. Burden of proof is yours." Bit if he said, "Hey Stark, care to debate the existence of god?" my reply would be (if I accepted the challenge), "ok. You show your side, I'll show mine."

Just sayin.

Just visiting.

-SR
Find all posts by this user
[+] 2 users Like Stark Raving's post
08-01-2013, 02:18 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
(08-01-2013 02:15 PM)Stark Raving Wrote:  You show me yours, I'll show you mine."
Fixt.

Much more fun this way (esp. for the audience)

Also, Erx seems to be AWOL, so someone has to take over... Dodgy

"E se non passa la tristezza con altri occhi la guarderĂ²."
Find all posts by this user
[+] 1 user Likes Vera's post
08-01-2013, 02:24 PM
RE: KingsChosen, I Challenge You To A Debate On the Existence of God
I stand corrected. I can't wait to see the evidence for god's non-existence.

"Whores perform the same function as priests, but far more thoroughly." - Robert A. Heinlein
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 
Forum Jump: