Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
|
|
|
21-12-2015, 05:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: [If this message is too much to read, please proceed right away to the end, read the end text which is in bold.] You wrote more than I. I simply defined a word. Oh and the people here have fine reading comprehension. You appear to think you are speaking with kindergarden students. We are far above that level. Show respect you pompous dullard. NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public. I will call him a liar and a dog here and now. Banjo. |
||||
21-12-2015, 05:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
#sigh |
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 05:53 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 05:05 PM)unfogged Wrote: Says the guy who posts little else but walls of text and puts this right after a caveat about the latest post maybe being too long. You don't get irony, do you? Pachomius thinks that irony is a reference to the plate in his skull. Either that or the rules only apply to everybody else. ---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
|
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 05:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 21-12-2015 06:04 PM by GirlyMan.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 05:47 PM)Paleophyte Wrote: Proof is for mathematicians and alcoholics. The rest of us rely on evidence. Stealing it. ![]() #sigh |
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: I yearn to learn from you, but please, with not too much to read from you, I love to learn from you in not more than 50 wordsMaybe starting a conversation in a text based medium is not the best choice for a person who can't process concepts that aren't little more then sound bites or the intellectual equivalent of a fucking finger painting? Laziness is a poor bedfellow for education and if a person wants to respond in 5 words or 500 you either address what they are saying or you excuse yourself from the conversation. You do not get to dictate the conversation anymore then you would to any other person you require education form like a Collage professor. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: What is in your own thinking and writing -– okay, no matter you get your thoughts from others, what is evidenceI've explained this 6+ times now and you have ignored it 6+ times now. Read peoples fucking responses. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: ...in the default status of things in the world, which default status is existence.This is meaningless and idiotic. The concept of a god exists in the world, but that does not mean a god as an entity exists in the world. Just cause it exists in the mind does NOT mean it exists outside of the mind. There is no "default" anything, your spouting out quasi-philosophical nonsense in an attempt to sound smarter then you actually are. It's not working by the way. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: Whiskey is no longer around, but I was hoping that he and I would continue with our exchange; that is the trouble with many folks...What the actual fuck are you talking about? There is a response from me literally 2 above your own post you stupid cunt. If I scroll to the top of your post I can fuckin' see my response you bumbling chucklefuck. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: once you want to carry on in earnest productive exchange with them,First off trying to change definitions to allow you to insert your bloody idiotic celestial boogyman is neither earnest nor honest. Secondly and more importantly me spending my time explaining to you words and concepts you should have learned in motherfuckin' primary school is not "productive" at all and it's especially not when your not even going to bother to read my fucking replies you wanker. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: I hope he will return to resume our exchange.Refusing to read or respond to my points doesn't mean I'VE left you piss swilling troglodyte. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: Tell me in your own words what is evidence.Done this 6+ times, go fuck yourself. (21-12-2015 04:43 PM)Pachomius Wrote: Forgive me, even though I say that I want to learn from you posters here, still I have to let readers know what is my own self-thought out concept of evidence, here:Well congratulations not only is your definition of evidence wrong it doesn't even bare a tangential resemblance to the actual definition of Evidence. It's also worthless. Voices in your head can lead a man to think he knows something to exist. People can lie to you and get the same result and that happens frequently all over the globe. Unless your "evidence" can be demonstrated, independently verified, falsified, and tested it's not fucking evidence and it's fucking worthless more than like a delusion. How do you know the first thing that lead you to believe another thing exists in fact it's self exists? No matter which way you turn you still have to rely on the actual godsdamn definition of evidence, so start using that definition not the one you made up for yourself. Your definition of evidence is so vague as to be meaningless and not in anyway helpful. You are NOT QUALIFIED TO HAVE THIS CONVERSATION. Kneel mortal before Whiskey I, Lord of Dalmore, Duke of Jameson, Defender of the Sloshed, and God-Emperor of Holy Terra. |
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
Predictions for Pachomius' next post:
---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
|
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 05:58 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:(21-12-2015 05:47 PM)Paleophyte Wrote: Proof is for mathematicians and alcoholics. The rest of us rely on evidence.Stealing it. Wow! Thanks! I just wish I could remember where I stole it from. ---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
|
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 06:12 PM)Paleophyte Wrote: Predictions for Pachomius' next post: Can I get odds on the superfecta 1, 2, 4, 5? #sigh |
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:21 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 06:20 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:(21-12-2015 05:58 PM)GirlyMan Wrote: Stealing it. Probably an alcoholic mathematician. #sigh |
||||
![]() |
21-12-2015, 06:29 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: Let us work together to concur on how to prove that something exists.
(21-12-2015 06:05 PM)WhiskeyDebates Wrote: Maybe starting a conversation in a text based medium is not the best choice for a person who can't process concepts that aren't little more then sound bites or the intellectual equivalent of a fucking finger painting? ![]() ![]() ---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
|
||||
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)