Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
Post Reply
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
22-08-2015, 02:05 PM
Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
Because sex has been such a popular topic HERE and well received and well responded to... allow me to proceed and show the direct connections of architecture with sacred sex. BOTH by design and involving the same principles. Not theories but sacred geometry perfectly harmonized with the most beautiful temple of all ... our human bodies.

WARNING be forewarned that eventually you will have to learn alignment, and mathematics to grasp the subject matter..... proceed if you dare and if you are a mature adult.... and want to know some of the mysteries of the Universe..

The Lord's Temple, Architecture, and Sacred Sex

Sacred Architecture was always meant to be more than just a building or a temple but spiritual principles illustrated in a
physical structure. Thus an ARCHway or entranceway into a holy temple was and still is considered sacred, in stepping
from the mundane physical world into the 'divine spiritual' world. This is why many temples, churches, or mosques used
a half 'vesica pisces' as their arch's in their architecture. The shape of two intersecting circles, which produced all shapes,
was not only symbolic of female genitalia but also as the gateway into another dimension of birth. For it is from here that
all births come through whether spiritual or physical. And it this entranceway or canal that leads to the sacred interior
and the womb of creation.

This is exactly the same principle as illustrated in the Template of all templates, the Holy Tabernacle as designed by the
Lord himself. He gave exact measurements and patterns to Moses, to be followed exactly according to His exact
blueprints for his moveable Temple in the wilderness. And this pattern was followed precisely in the 1st and 2nd static
Temples built on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, so as to retain the exact same proportions and power as the

Matter of fact, the Lord even had the Temple aligned facing eastward so that the Son's rising in the East could penetrate
the opened doors of the Holy Place and shine towards the Veil and symbolically into the darkened Holy of Holies in the
West. This sexual truth where light (masculine) penetrates the darkness (feminine) and gives birth to life could hardly be
better illustrated physically which is why true Christian churches tend to similarly align themselves with the altar in the
West and the main entrance in the East, if possible. This is also why Jesus came into the Temple grounds from the
eastern Gate and will do this once again, (even though it has been sealed) in his true Millennial Re-Entry into His temple
Mount, to reclaim His Bride, His Temple.

Yet the temple is only a shadow of the true, to remind the Lord's worshippers of His Eternal truths, for the true temple
of God is His Body and we are made in His 'Divine Image'. This is why the disciples wrote to the undiscerning 'Know ye
Not that ye are the Temple of God and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you (if they had received the Holy Spirit of
God)'. For as the great prophet Isaiah said….'What house will ye build the Lord, for His hands has made all these things.'
(Isaiah 66: 1-2) But we are his Temple made without hands, designed in his holy divine image.

We are the real Temple of God and he dwells in our praises from the heart. We are the stars of Heaven, for literally we
are designed exactly after the pentagonal star with ratios exactly matching the 'golden section' (See Golden Section and our
Bodies class). And this is not by chance but again by design to conform to his 'Holy Body'. For we didn't shape
ourselves, and our mothers only were the vessels from which we came, and we definitely are NOT products of Evolution
and chance. For again if you study the beauty of the 'golden section' ratio you discover it stems from reproduction of
mature individuals and the raising of offspring to maturity until each new generation expands by 1.618 For again when we
are combined together as One, we actually become Pillars in His temple (Rev 3:12) as the angel said to John. In other
words, we are the Pillars of Faith, our spiritual faith is our strength.

And it all stems from the Holy of Holies, the magical cube of 10 cubits by 10c. by 10 c. This is the Center of creativity,
the womb of the Universe, because it symbolizes God's Spirit over His Law and over His ARK in the darkened and
veiled Holy of Holies. Why, because His Spirit, needs not any physical light because His Words (DNA) are all that is
needed to bring the Law to life, and the staff of life into budding. (See Shepherd's Rod). His Holy of Holies doubles itself,
just as biologically our cells replicate themselves, and becomes the Holy Place exactly twice the size of the inner shrine.
And all life proceeds from there, through the portal of his Two pillars, Joachim and Boaz, male and female.

And it's all sexual, because our Creator who is called JESUS, designed His Temple and us, to be NOT stagnant and sterile
but reproducing, and NOT dead and dying but alive and living. (SEE Lord's Temple is Human and Sexual) And when He
brings down His ultimate Temple, New Jerusalem, from the heavenlies, we will be part of it.

Isn't His Temple amazing ?

In His Service

David Jay Jordan

( From http://www.davidjayjordan.com/Lordstempl...edsex.html )
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2015, 02:07 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
At work.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2015, 02:14 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
(22-08-2015 02:07 PM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  At work.


Let me help you Peeb....

The Lord's Temple is Human and Sexual

The prophet Jeremiah said, 'Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple
of the LORD, are these.'(7: 4), because people tend to believe in the physical building whether a church or ynagogue or mosque,
and think the building is holy and blessed rather than God. They worship a thing rather than the Creator of all things. And it is for
this reason that the prophet Hosea repeated this message in saying, 'Israel hath forgotten his Maker, and buildeth temples' (8: 14).

And yet King David felt convicted when he lived in a beautiful house and so wanted the Lord to have a beautiful earthly house or
temple as well, rather than just the portable Tabernacle. And so his Son 'Solomon built him an house. Howbeit the most High
dwelleth not in temples made with hands; as saith the prophet, Heaven is my throne, and earth is my footstool: what house will
ye build me? saith the Lord: or what is the place of my rest? Hath not my hand made all these things? (Acts 7: 47-50).

But the Temple wasn't to be worshipped, for even Jesus himself said, the second Temple in Jerusalem would again be destroyed
just as Solomon's was. (Mathew 24: 1-2). Because temples are temporal and only a shadow of the real spiritual reality. For as the
Lord taught all his disciples, 'Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? (I
Corinthinians 3: 16). In other words, we are His temple that he wants to live inside. He wants to be part of us and in our hearts to
guide us. 'For (we) are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their
God, and they shall be my people. (2 Corinthinians 6: 16) We are the composition of His temple, we are the stones that make it
up, just as peter said, 'Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices,
acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.

We are the Bride of Christ that the Bridegroom loves and adores. We are the one that He wants to unite with and become One
with, and of whom He will not be ashamed to say that we are His Bride and Beloved. (SEE Bride of Christ Scriptures in Old
Testament). And it is this physical/spiritual union that we celebrate in the Communion that we celebrate in honour to His
remembrance. Our bodies are His temple and we are his Bride, and it is for this reason that sexual symbolism is so integral in the
sacred divine design of Solomon's Temple. (SEE Lord's Temple, Architecture and Sex) David didn't make it up out of his own
imagination, but got the details straight from the Lord himself.

And it is for this reason, that Solomon's Temple foreshadows the Bridegroom's entry into His Bride at our Wedding Feast after
the End of His-Story (See Revelations Timeline). For the light entering the opening of the Holy Place has this obvious connotation
in sexuality and is seen in almost all sacred structures. (SEE Lightning, Electricity and Sex) And yet if you think that sex is from
the devil, rather than made by the Lord, then surely these things will be hard for you to understand. But into the pure all things are
pure. (SEE Sex is Divine)

But do the research for yourself, and don't just read my writings, and then compare what you learn with this website called
'King's Solomon's Temple Secrets'. Its explanations are good and graphics easy to understand, even though the author thinks he can
copyright the Lord's design, it's still an excellent resource to study in my opinion. And if you hyperlink to his sexual parallels and
explanations, all these truths become clearer and clearer, if you have an open mind. So if interested read and study his, 'Sexual
Symobolism of Solomon's Temple'.

The evidence in history and design and scriptures is pretty convincing, the more you look into it, because the physical parallels
the spiritual. For Solomon's Temple does appear to be in the design pattern of our sacred bodies which were 'Made in His Image'.
And as can be seen on the web-site it even co-relates to prophecy in Daniel 2, and the image of man shown to King Nebucanezar
by the Lord himself. And yet the author and webmaster of the preceeding web-site, is a little leary in explaining the sexuality of
the Temple of the Lord, so let's go a step further into possible explanations, especially in relationship to the Lord's Future
Prophecy and the Two Pillars in front of the Temple. (Consider Jachin and Boaz Pillars )

For as the Bible and this site mentions, it is decorated with lilies which are a love symbol and feminine. While its pomegranates
are obviously masculine and symbolic of the fertility and power of its seeds which we all know come from the male testes. And
these are placed on the chapiters of the two pillars that are at the entrance of the Holy Place and its doors. The sacred chamber of
course being symbolic of the vagina, and the Holy of Holies being the Womb, dark and lit only by the Light of Light and His
Spirit. The Holy of Holies being the most sacred of all places, from whence all creation started and where the Spirit of God resides
in all Holiness. (SEE Creation not Evolution)

But outside the temple, the two pillars are representative of our two prophets in the End-Time called the 'Two Witnesses'
(Revelation 11). And these are the two that guard the entrance way into the Lord's Holy Place or Encampment in the Last Days.
(SEE Shepherd's Rod and Entrance test). The one pillar is our King, while the other is our priest or priestess. Why, do I say, there
is a possibility that is have a priestess as our priest in the End-Time in carrying for the Ark and the Tabernacle, because in esoteric
scriptures, it sometimes refers to them as a he and she, a male and female, a perfect balancing of Jochim and Boaz, one white and
one black, as in the Song of Solomon and its passionate love story between them. For do remember in the Last days, every bond
shall broken and there will be racial and sexual 'Equality' with the Lord and among His people.

Therefore it appears that the sex is involved in the Lord's design of his Temple. And we are that temple, because He doesn't
dwell in a Temple made with hands but in us, living temples made by His Hands. We therefore need to receive His Spirit to receive
Him and His Salvation ....and then we shall be an ETERNAL TEMPLE of the LIVING GOD.

In His Service


More graphics and confirmations at Golden Section Design of Humans

(For hyperlinks SEE http://www.davidjayjordan.com/LordsTempl...exual.html )
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2015, 02:29 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
At work.

I'll bother not skimming over your writings when/after you give an opinion on mine.

Sorry I can't add the old link at this time.......
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2015, 02:29 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
(22-08-2015 02:05 PM)Davidjayjordan Wrote:  *******************************************
WARNING be forewarned that eventually you will have to learn alignment, and mathematics to grasp the subject matter..... proceed if you dare and if you are a mature adult.... and want to know some of the mysteries of the Universe..

[Image: math_o_166669.jpg]

"I feel as though the camera is almost a kind of voyeur in Mr. Beans life, and you just watch this bizarre man going about his life in the way that he wants to."

-Rowan Atkinson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 8 users Like Can_of_Beans's post
22-08-2015, 02:33 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
and yet again we have regurgitation of lies, deception, forgery, and fantasy.

Prophet jeremiah? Laugh out load

King David? Laugh out load

Matthew? Who wrote that my good friend?

and you didn't refer to Daniel did you? truly? that forged and inaccurate BS? here, because I pity your ignorance, I will, yet again, give you a crumb of knowledge....you see dear friend, not only do I have three degrees, but one is in religious studies, with specialization in Christianity. I will continue to teach you your own faith. Remember though faith is the belief in something without evidence. Facepalm

The Book of Daniel is often paired with the Book of Revelation as providing the road map of future end-time events. Many alleged prophecies in Daniel were fulfilled, but is that because Daniel was a divinely inspired seer? Critical scholars see a more mundane explanation. Daniel might actually be a Jew from the Hellenistic period, not a person from the Babylonian court. His so-called prophecies were made ex eventu, or after the fact, so that he could pass himself off as a genuine seer. The book itself betrays more than one author. Chapters 1–6 were written in Aramaic, while chapters 7–12 are in Hebrew. Daniel makes many historical errors when talking about the Babylonian period, the time in which he supposedly lived. For example, he claims that Belshazzar was the son of Nebuchadnezzar, but the Nabonidus Cylinder found in Ur names Nabonidus as Belshazzar’s actual father.

Also, Belshazzar was a crown prince but never a king, contrary to Daniel’s claim. In Daniel 5:30, Daniel writes that a certain Darius the Mede conquered Babylon. It was actually Cyrus the Great, a Persian and not a Mede, who overthrew Babylon. On the other hand, Daniel writes about events of the Hellenistic era with extreme accuracy. Chapter 11, presented as prophecy, is on the mark in every detail. This leads to the conclusion that Daniel was witness to these events but not to those of the Babylonian period, on which he is vague and unfamiliar.

Scholars thus place the writings of Daniel at around 167–164 B.C., during the persecution of the Jews by Syrian tyrant Antiochus Epiphanes. The book was meant as inspirational fiction to encourage the Jews in their time of trial. Daniel did take a shot at making a real prophecy, predicting the death of Antiochus in the Holy Land. This genuine prophecy turned out to be wrong. Antiochus actually died in Persia in 164 B.C.

Traditionally ascribed to Daniel himself, modern scholarly consensus considers the book pseudonymous, the stories of the first half legendary in origin, and the visions of the second the product of anonymous authors in the Maccabean period (2nd century BCE). Its exclusion from the Prophets (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and the Twelve) was probably because it appeared after the canon for those books had closed, and the dominant view among scholars is that Daniel is not in any case a prophetic book but an apocalypse.

Daniel is one of a large number of Jewish apocalypses, all of them pseudonymous. Although the entire book is traditionally ascribed to Daniel the seer, chapters 1–6 are in the voice of an anonymous narrator, except for chapter 4 which is in the form of a letter from king Nebuchadnezzar; only the second half (chapters 7–12) is presented by Daniel himself, introduced by the anonymous narrator in chapters 7 and 10. The real author/editor of Daniel was probably an educated Jew, knowledgeable in Greek learning, and of high standing in his own community. It is possible that the name of Daniel was chosen for the hero of the book because of his reputation as a wise seer in Hebrew tradition.

Daniel's exclusion from the Hebrew bible's canon of the prophets, which was closed around 200 BCE, suggests it was not known at that time, and the Wisdom of Sirach, from around 180 BCE, draws on almost every book of the Old Testament except Daniel, leading scholars to suppose that its author was unaware of it. Daniel is, however, quoted by the author of a section of the Sibylline Oracles commonly dated to the middle of the 2nd century BCE, and was popular at Qumran beginning at much the same time, suggesting that it was known and revered from the middle of that century.

The actual historical setting of the book is clear from chapter 11, where the prophecy is accurate down to the career of Antiochus IV Epiphanes, king of Syria and oppressor of the Jews, but not in its prediction of his death: the author knows about Antiochus' two campaigns in Egypt (169 and 167 BCE), the desecration of the Temple (the "abomination of desolation"), and the fortification of the Akra (a fortress built inside Jerusalem), but he knows nothing about the reconstruction of the Temple or the actual circumstances of the death of Antiochus in late 164. Chapters 10–12 must therefore have been written between 167 and 164 BCE. There is no evidence of a significant time lapse between those chapters and chapters 8 and 9, and chapter 7 may have been written just a few months earlier again. (Wiki)

Now the good stuff:

Today the consensus of scholars understands the whole book of Daniel to be put together by an author editor who first collected traditional stories in chapters 1-6 about the boy hero Daniel showing his courage during the persecutions of exile, and added to them the visions of chapters 7 – 12 that predicted the coming end of Antiochus Epiphanes and his persecution. This kind of writing is called a Vaticinium ex eventu, a “prediction after the fact,” in which an author creates a character of long ago and puts into his mouth as predictions all the important events that have already happened right to the author’s own time and place. The language is often coded with symbolic animals and colors and dates to protect its message from the persecuting authorities. Its focus is not on predicting the future, but getting some meaning to present happenings by explaining the past events that led up to this terrible situation (Boadt 1984, p509).

To achieve such an important purpose, the authors mixed historical facts with older religious traditions and even pagan myths (Boadt 1984, p509).

It is important to note that the entire book claims to take place in the sixth century BC and to report a series of visions that come to the boy Daniel, who is remarkable for his great wisdom and his ability to receive divine revelation about the future. Very few scholars today, however, believe that this book originated in any way during the days of the Babylonian exile. And the ones who do usually have a very difficult time explaining the references to historical people and places which seem to be grossly wrong.

Darius the Mede is called the son of Xerxes in 5:31 and 9:11, both are wrong:

Darius was not a Mede but a Persian and the father of Xerxes. Belshazzar is called the king of Babylon in chapter 7 and the son of Nebuchadnezzar in chapter 5. He was neither: he was only crown prince under his father Nabonidus.

In chapter 6 Cyrus succeeds Darius as King of the Persians. This too has history backward, since Cyrus was the founder of the Persian dynasty. The author seems to be quite confused about his facts and either lived long afterward or else intended the giant bloopers to warn the audience that what follows is not intended as history but a story of faith; similar to the approach of the book of Judith (Boadt 1984, p508).

Although the book of Daniel was supposed to have been written during the Babylonian exile by an official of King Nebuchadnezzar, modern scholars date its writings to the second century BCE. The reasons for this include:

• It is listed in the writings of the Jewish canon, rather than the Prophets. This indicates that Daniel was written after the collection of prophetic books had been closed (sometime after 300 B.C.E.)
• Parts of the book (2.4 – 7.28) were written in Aramaic, which suggest a later date when Aramaic had become the common language.
• The author of Daniel used Persian and Greek words that would not have been known to residents Babylon in the sixth century BCE.
• The book contains numerous historical inaccuracies when dealing with sixth century B.C.E. Babylonian history. Such mistakes would not have been made by an important official of King Nebuchadnezzar.
• Daniel is the only book in the Old Testament in which angels are given names (such as Gabriel in 8.16 and 9.21 and Michael and 10.13, 10.21, and 12.1). Elsewhere in the Bible, names for angels only appear in the Apocrypha and the New Testament.
• The absence of Daniel’s name in the list of Israel’s great men in Ecclesiasticus.
• Nebuchadrezzar is spelled Nebuchadnezzar in Daniel, which is the way the king’s name was spelled, under Greek influence, at a later time.
• In 2.2 the Kings wise men are called “Chaldeans.” But at the time of Nebuchadrezzar, “Chaldean” would have referred to the nationality. It was only centuries later that this word came to mean sorcerer or astrologer. (Wells 2013, p 1109)

Do you see how these books were put together not by whom you think, not when you think and how they are allegorical writings based on parables, meant to drive a message and purposely designed in a hubris attempt to give them credibility? This was the driving force for me losing my faith, an intelligent person can't ignore facts, and the facts have been laid out. The more I learned, the more I thought, the less I believed. Your thoughts?

Works cited:


Boadt, L. (1984) Reading the Old Testament: An Introduction. New York. Paulist Press.

Wells, S. (2013) The skeptics annotated Bible. New York. SAB Books, LLC

Look at you learning shit, yet again. I am here for you.

"Belief is so often the death of reason" - Qyburn, Game of Thrones

"The Christian community continues to exist because the conclusions of the critical study of the Bible are largely withheld from them." -Hans Conzelmann (1915-1989)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like goodwithoutgod's post
22-08-2015, 02:42 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
Back to the topic.. Temple Architecture and why its design template matches the ultimate temple... our human body.

Oh heck, how about Jewsih website as my graphics might be too strong for you

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2015, 02:46 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
Oh, for fucks sake! Facepalm

Here's your coat and your hat...

[Image: weirdalfoil_2322.jpg]

.....don't slam the door when you leave.

Shakespeare's Comedy of Errors.... on Donald J. Trump:

He is deformed, crooked, old, and sere,
Ill-fac’d, worse bodied, shapeless every where;
Vicious, ungentle, foolish, blunt, unkind,
Stigmatical in making, worse in mind.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like dancefortwo's post
22-08-2015, 03:02 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex

"Theology made no provision for evolution. The biblical authors had missed the most important revelation of all! Could it be that they were not really privy to the thoughts of God?" - E. O. Wilson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes RocketSurgeon76's post
22-08-2015, 03:03 PM
RE: Lord's Architecture and Sacred Sex
You wonder if Jeebus the great creator ever tried to reproduce with one of his male disciples! Narry a single baby oven among that bunch! Undecided

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: