Louise Antony vs William Lane Craig (Is God Necessary for Morality)
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
16-06-2013, 04:31 AM
Louise Antony vs William Lane Craig (Is God Necessary for Morality)
I was suspended from the RF forums for this post:

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/forums/cr...94.45.html

Quote:Antony utterly demolished Craig in this debate. WLC resorted to lying about her feelings and love for her family and pets. How anyone can consider Craig a decent human being is beyond me.

The debate in question:







Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-06-2013, 06:00 AM (This post was last modified: 16-06-2013 06:36 AM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Louise Antony vs William Lane Craig (Is God Necessary for Morality)
Hey. Right under your post, our old idiot poster, Pussy Cat, IRC. I always knew he was a minion of WLC. Nothing WLC says or does would surprise me.
His sophistry is well known to anyone who has followed even a few of his debates. His abysmal behavior in the Bart Ehrman debate proved to me that he was a charlatan, and would do anything to appear to win a debate, including blatantly lying to his audience ... as he does here see post # 39 :
http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...ight=Craig

Interesting she references Euthyphro's dilemma.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthyphro_dilemma
We discussed it once here : http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/forum/...ure?page=4

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/scienc...d=all&_r=0




Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein Certified Ancient Astronaut Theorist and Levitating yogi, CAAT-LY.
Assistant Manager, Vice Detection, Whoville : Jebus no likey that which doth tickle thee unto thy nether regions.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: