Mathematics - a new basis
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
12-03-2013, 09:03 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
[Image: 1336676259516.jpg]

Welcome to science. You're gonna like it here - Phil Plait

Have you ever tried taking a comfort blanket away from a small child? - DLJ
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like robotworld's post
12-03-2013, 09:19 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(12-03-2013 05:59 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  When you look at the solution below will not be clear
1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3
2. 3 + [1] 3 = 4
3. 3 + [2] 3 = 5
4. 3 + [3] 3 = 6 or 3 +3 = 6

What are you attempting to accomplish with those brackets? '[ ]' Clearly not multiplication.

(12-03-2013 05:59 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7
6.33Rd1 (6) d2 (8) +3 = 8
7.33Rd1 (6) d2 (9) +3 = 9
8.33Rd1 (6) d2 (10) +3 = 10
9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12) +3 = 12

What is 'R' and 'd'
and are these brackets implying multiplication or...?

2.5 billion seconds total
1.67 billion seconds conscious

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2013, 09:47 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
You're shittin' me, right?

Is this really going to happen again?

Hobo

Humankind Dodgy (a total misnomer)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes aurora's post
12-03-2013, 10:04 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(12-03-2013 09:47 PM)aurora Wrote:  You're shittin' me, right?

Is this really going to happen again?

Hobo

I wasn't here for the last one, and I have no motivation to go back and read through it. I did hear some things about this guy... But oh well. Either he answers my questions or he doesn't Tongue

2.5 billion seconds total
1.67 billion seconds conscious

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2013, 10:12 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(12-03-2013 10:04 PM)Aspchizo Wrote:  
(12-03-2013 09:47 PM)aurora Wrote:  You're shittin' me, right?

Is this really going to happen again?

Hobo

I wasn't here for the last one, and I have no motivation to go back and read through it. I did hear some things about this guy... But oh well. Either he answers my questions or he doesn't Tongue
hehe, and that'll be....he doesn't! Dodgy

Humankind Dodgy (a total misnomer)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-03-2013, 11:14 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
Missy, is that really you? Damn, son. You have one tenacious history here with us. Keep Rockin' On! As only YOU can!!!

"All that is necessary for the triumph of Calvinism is that good Atheists do nothing." ~Eric Oh My
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-03-2013, 06:29 AM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(12-03-2013 09:19 PM)Aspchizo Wrote:  What are you attempting to accomplish with those brackets? '[ ]' Clearly not multiplication.
[a] or [.b] - where the action is happening addition (arithmetic operations)
----------

1 Mathematics Space
We'll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
prove.
1.Natural geometric object - natural straight line .
2.Real geometric objects - real straight lines .
1.1 Natural along
In the picture there is a natural geometric object straight line (AB), it has a beginning (A)
and end (B) - this property natural long'll call point.

[Image: 26970d1359295484t-mathematics-new-basis-w1.png]

1.2 The basic rule
Two (more) natural straight line are connected only with points.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes msbiljanica's post
13-03-2013, 08:08 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
Shit MissyB, where you been? I've missed you and your "natural alongs" almost as much as I missed Cantor and his Gwynnies when he took a break. Welcome back buddy.

Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-03-2013, 08:11 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(13-03-2013 08:08 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Shit MissyB, where you been? I've missed you and your "natural alongs" almost as much as I missed Cantor and his Gwynnies when he took a break. Welcome back buddy.

Surely you jest. Shocking

It was amusing once, but not again.

It's like the time your crazy uncle got drunk at your cousin's wedding and pissed in the punchbowl.
Makes for an amusing story, but you don't want the event repeated. Dodgy

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
13-03-2013, 08:21 PM
RE: Mathematics - a new basis
(13-03-2013 08:11 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(13-03-2013 08:08 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Shit MissyB, where you been? I've missed you and your "natural alongs" almost as much as I missed Cantor and his Gwynnies when he took a break. Welcome back buddy.

Surely you jest. Shocking

It was amusing once, but not again.

It's like the time your crazy uncle got drunk at your cousin's wedding and pissed in the punchbowl.
Makes for an amusing story, but you don't want the event repeated. Dodgy

Nah, he ain't that bad, kinda even like the fucker, he don't troll us. He just shows up periodically to show us his latest rendering of Gwyneth Paltrow, his raison d'ĂȘtre, and then moves on. You're still trying to interpret his work as math instead of art. Tongue

Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: