Mathematics  a new basis



15032013, 09:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 15032013 09:58 AM by msbiljanica.)




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
(15032013 06:22 AM)Kreuzfel Wrote: Can I ask you, before you try to understand the new math, what are its advantages over traditional math?possible graph of the function (with three or more unknown), it is possible to 0:6 = 3, there are many types of functions, the more arithmetical operations 

1 user Likes msbiljanica's post 
15032013, 07:40 PM
(This post was last modified: 15032013 08:25 PM by GirlyMan.)




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
(15032013 09:54 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:(15032013 06:22 AM)Kreuzfel Wrote: Can I ask you, before you try to understand the new math, what are its advantages over traditional math?possible graph of the function (with three or more unknown), it is possible to 0:6 = 3, there are many types of functions, the more arithmetical operations It is, possible, brother, it is. ... And it's trivial to do so. As it was in the beginning is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. And I will show you something different from either Your shadow at morning striding behind you Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you; I will show you fear in a handful of dust. 

16032013, 08:38 AM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
2.2 Numeral semiline, numeric point "2.1"
Theoremcharacter mark points on the oneway infinite long (A, B, C, ...), replace the labels {(0), (0.1), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ), ...} which are set circular and positionally. picture (https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F411219...CF17%21105  slike i formule ) Proof  is obtained by numerical along which the numerical point of {(0,00,000, 0000, ...), (0,1,10,11,100,101, ...), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 12, ...), ...}. 

18032013, 10:15 AM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
2.3 Natural numbers "2.2"
Theorem  There is a relationship (length) between Point in numeric (0) and all points Numeral semiline. Proof  Value (length) numeric point (0) and numerical point (0) the number 0 1.. Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (1) the number o1 2.. Ratio (required) numeric point (0) and numeric item (2) is the number 2 3.. Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 3 4.. Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 4 5.. ... Set  all the possibilities given theorem. The set of natural numbers N = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, ...}. picture ( https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F411219...CF17%21105  slike i formule )  Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics) numeral semiline  axiom numerical point  axiom set  axiom natural numbers axion 

18032013, 10:10 PM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
Karma police, arrest this man.
He talks in maths. He buzzes like a fridge. He's like a detuned radio 

19032013, 11:22 AM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
2.4 Mobile Number "2.2,2.3"
TheoremNatural numbers can be specified and other numerical point other than the point numeric 0th Proof  Value (length) numeric point (0) and numeric point (2) the number 2 1.. Ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 2 2.. Ratio (length) numerical point (2) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 2 3.. ... A set of mobile numbers Nn = {[n]N} pictures ( https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48F411219...CF17%21105  slike i formule ) 

20032013, 05:38 PM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
Does the US government use your theorems as a basis for economic plans?
That would explain a lot. 

08042013, 12:01 PM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
PDF  Mathematics  a new base
https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=48f411219...CF17%21105 

08042013, 12:33 PM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
Welcome back, Ms. Nutjob.
E ^{2} = (mc ^{2})^{2} + (pc )^{2} _{6}^{14}C → _{7}^{14}N + e^{–} + ̅ν_{e} 2 K_{(s)} + 2 H_{2}O_{(l)} → 2 KOH_{(aq)} + H_{2 (g)} + 196 kJ/mol It works, bitches. 

08042013, 01:26 PM




RE: Mathematics  a new basis
Ugh, didn't realize how old this thread was before I read it.
You get smacked with wet feathers now for doing that.... (12032013 05:59 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: 9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12) +3 = 12My brain saw that as something like, Attacking a 6 hit die monster with a +3 twohanded sword..... 

2 users Like LostLocke's post 
« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)