My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
17-03-2014, 08:02 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 05:29 PM)LostandInsecure Wrote:  While you were gone, Girly bought you a blow job. Let me know if you decide to cash in Big Grin

He said to give it to me Drinking Beverage

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like TheGulegon's post
17-03-2014, 08:02 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 07:55 PM)Anjele Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 07:54 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  Rule 5 says you get a warning first(which I never got...even after asking if I was under probation or something) THEN temp bans(which is what I got)...then full ban.

KC didn't follow his own rules.

Try again. Read all the words.....

You mean these ones where it says you get a warning before a temp ban?

Quote:In the event that it is felt by the forum Administration that a person is causing excessive issues then they will be officially warned. Failure to heed the warning may lead to temporary bans leading up to a permanent ban if the offending behaviour is not ceased

I can't argue with you anymore Anjele....you comprehension of English is just to limited.

Vosur, Anjele, Hanoff.....have you learned nothing in my absence?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-03-2014, 08:03 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 07:54 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 07:52 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Reread what Rev said...read all the words.

--this is a comment

Rule 5 says you get a warning first(which I never got...even after asking if I was under probation or something) THEN temp bans(which is what I got)...then full ban.

KC didn't follow his own rules.

Read the fucking rules before you try to lawyer them.
Quote:Banning is at the sole discretion of the forum Admins. Any account can be banned at any time regardless of whether a rule has been broken. Any such action will only be taken in the most extreme situations, with the deepest consideration, and after exhaustive attempts to resolve the issue.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Chas's post
17-03-2014, 08:04 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
Call The Hague! blowjob thinks his human right to due forum process was violated!!

[Image: sigvacachica.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like nach_in's post
17-03-2014, 08:04 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
Yabut. Nobody likes you. I don't know what world you live in that you think it doesn't matter. The solution is not more rules, but rather to stop being such a douchebag.

[Image: klingon_zps7e68578a.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 9 users Like houseofcantor's post
17-03-2014, 08:05 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 08:02 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 07:55 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Try again. Read all the words.....

You mean these ones where it says you get a warning before a temp ban?

Quote:In the event that it is felt by the forum Administration that a person is causing excessive issues then they will be officially warned. Failure to heed the warning may lead to temporary bans leading up to a permanent ban if the offending behaviour is not ceased

I can't argue with you anymore Anjele....you comprehension of English is just to limited.

Again, that hurts coming from you.

Revs told you that you got a suspension and not a ban because you hadn't received a warning. That was at the discretion of the admins, they didn't have to allow you a second chance at all.

See here they are, the bruises, some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Anjele's post
17-03-2014, 08:08 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 08:05 PM)Anjele Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 08:02 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  You mean these ones where it says you get a warning before a temp ban?


I can't argue with you anymore Anjele....you comprehension of English is just to limited.

Again, that hurts coming from you.

Revs told you that you got a suspension and not a ban because you hadn't received a warning. That was at the discretion of the admins, they didn't have to allow you a second chance at all.

A suspension is a temp ban.

You and Revs are engaging in word salad to save face.

Vosur, Anjele, Hanoff.....have you learned nothing in my absence?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-03-2014, 08:10 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
You really have the nerve to play the semantics card?

See here they are, the bruises, some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-03-2014, 08:10 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 08:08 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 08:05 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Again, that hurts coming from you.

Revs told you that you got a suspension and not a ban because you hadn't received a warning. That was at the discretion of the admins, they didn't have to allow you a second chance at all.

A suspension is a temp ban.

You and Revs are engaging in word salad to save face.

welcome to the world of law, where rules are made up and everything is a word salad.

Right now you are losing by a potato of points Thumbsup

[Image: sigvacachica.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 6 users Like nach_in's post
17-03-2014, 08:11 PM
RE: My suspension and the need for an anti-flaming rule
(17-03-2014 08:08 PM)Heywood Jahblome Wrote:  
(17-03-2014 08:05 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Again, that hurts coming from you.

Revs told you that you got a suspension and not a ban because you hadn't received a warning. That was at the discretion of the admins, they didn't have to allow you a second chance at all.

A suspension is a temp ban.

You and Revs are engaging in word salad to save face.

Sorry but the precedent with Rule 5 was set with Absol who was just banned outright. It is at the discretion of the Admins if they skip the lesser steps. In your case it was felt since you did not receive any previous warnings a permanent ban was too much.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: