New To Forum
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
18-05-2015, 03:23 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:17 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:15 PM)jockmcdock Wrote:  oh, for GOD'S sake!!!!!! Are you really that stupid????

WE don't come up with goddidit. Your lot does.

Am I talking to a wall here?

Is English your first language?

Isn't that what I just said? Yep... you quoted it.

Want me to post it in Spanish?

Want it in Dutch and German?

And you really are that stupid.

Theists came up with goddidit? Who the fuck else would have?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:24 PM
RE: New To Forum
No estoy bien. Sólo trato de hablar con sencillez.

Si usted no cree en un dios / Dios, entonces no hay razón para pensar en tener una explicación " goddidit " en la evolución.

Si usted cree en un dios / Dios, entonces tiene que haber una reconciliación ; por tanto, una explicación " goddidit " para la evolución.

No veo cómo esto es demasiado complicado y confuso.

Supongo que sobrestimado algunos de ustedes.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:26 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:23 PM)jockmcdock Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:17 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  Am I talking to a wall here?

Is English your first language?

Isn't that what I just said? Yep... you quoted it.

Want me to post it in Spanish?

Want it in Dutch and German?

And you really are that stupid.

Theists came up with goddidit? Who the fuck else would have?

How am I stupid for stating the fact that theists insert a "goddidit" in evolution and atheists don't?

You're trying to pick a fight and looking retarded.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:27 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:24 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  No estoy bien. Sólo trato de hablar con sencillez.

Si usted no cree en un dios / Dios, entonces no hay razón para pensar en tener una explicación " goddidit " en la evolución.

Si usted cree en un dios / Dios, entonces tiene que haber una reconciliación ; por tanto, una explicación " goddidit " para la evolución.

No veo cómo esto es demasiado complicado y confuso.

Supongo que sobrestimado algunos de ustedes.

Hartstikke bedankt. Klootzaak.Wat ben je een idioot. Lul.

You don't actually have a response, do you? Except nonsense.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:28 PM
RE: New To Forum
Mandarin

不,我没事。只是想说话干脆。

如果你不相信神/上帝,那么没有理由就别想有在进化中“ goddidit ”的解释。

如果你相信上帝/上帝,那么必须有一个和解;因而“ goddidit ”解释进化。

我看不出这是过于复杂和混乱。

我想我高估了你们中的一些。

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:28 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:27 PM)jockmcdock Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:24 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  No estoy bien. Sólo trato de hablar con sencillez.

Si usted no cree en un dios / Dios, entonces no hay razón para pensar en tener una explicación " goddidit " en la evolución.

Si usted cree en un dios / Dios, entonces tiene que haber una reconciliación ; por tanto, una explicación " goddidit " para la evolución.

No veo cómo esto es demasiado complicado y confuso.

Supongo que sobrestimado algunos de ustedes.

Hartstikke bedankt. Klootzaak.Wat ben je een idioot. Lul.

You don't actually have a response, do you? Except nonsense.
Sec, let me get my Google language thing ready I've been messing with.

This Dutch or German?

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:30 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:27 PM)jockmcdock Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:24 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  No estoy bien. Sólo trato de hablar con sencillez.

Si usted no cree en un dios / Dios, entonces no hay razón para pensar en tener una explicación " goddidit " en la evolución.

Si usted cree en un dios / Dios, entonces tiene que haber una reconciliación ; por tanto, una explicación " goddidit " para la evolución.

No veo cómo esto es demasiado complicado y confuso.

Supongo que sobrestimado algunos de ustedes.

Hartstikke bedankt. Klootzaak.Wat ben je een idioot. Lul.

You don't actually have a response, do you? Except nonsense.

You called me an idiot.

Woooooow. Impressive rebuttal.

Again. Please read. And comprehend. Or try to.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:32 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:13 PM)objectivetheist Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 07:46 AM)Clockwork Wrote:  If I remember correctly, Ashari value revelation over reason. That was one of the issues between Ashari and Mutazila.

If I'm wrong please enlighten me.

I'm not sure how you can be objective like that.

Ash'arites state that faith is based on the usage of the mind.
Didn't really answer. So I'll let you carry on.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:33 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:28 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:27 PM)jockmcdock Wrote:  Hartstikke bedankt. Klootzaak.Wat ben je een idioot. Lul.

You don't actually have a response, do you? Except nonsense.
Sec, let me get my Google language thing ready I've been messing with.

This Dutch or German?

Dutch.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
18-05-2015, 03:36 PM
RE: New To Forum
(18-05-2015 03:23 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(18-05-2015 03:19 PM)objectivetheist Wrote:  Evolution on the other hand is an inferred hypothesis from different observable experiments.


No, it's actually been observed. It's not a hypothesis.

To clarify what I mean I say: what is observable is limited in its scope. The facts of natural selection have been proven through observation. Random beneficial mutation on the other hand is less observable but nevertheless is also a reality. It has been noticed in nature. However it does not account for building complex organisms, that is something inferred and hypothesised by scientists.
The outreach of random mutation has been inflated. Its actual reach is much more limited.

Then we have the fossil records... Well much of what is INFERRED from the fossil record is speculation. It does not count as overwhelming bindin proof. What is inferred is based upon the inferences of Darwinism. Yes there are a few cases of hybrid forms but the Cambrian explosion shows that not all creatures have hybrid forms but appeared fully formed on earth..
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: