Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
05-07-2013, 07:01 PM
Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 06:55 PM)cjlr Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 04:38 PM)I and I Wrote:  You brought up other examples of other shit. Why were they addressed to me? I am referring to a vehicle or plane slamming into a building and nothing else. That is like saying " well the basketball and wall don't break apart therefore two colliding cars shouldn't break into pieces. That is a completely stupid way of arguing against or explaining why AT IMPACT there was no plane parts breaking apart.

Look at the video of the plane going into the building, the plane doesn't break apart at all on impact.

So, you... think that pieces are just going to fly off in all directions at the moment of impact, do you?

As has been mentioned quite a few times upthread, there is the concept of momentum.


Now, the actually interesting question is how you resolve your imagined (and it is so very, very, imagined) discrepancy. Is it A- the impact was from some sort of object which would not break apart; or B- the footage is fake.

So if I believe a plane crashing into something at high speeds should break off into pieces, then to you that is a crazy belief? Show me some examples of this happening before or after 9-11
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2013, 07:21 PM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 07:01 PM)I and I Wrote:  So if I believe a plane crashing into something at high speeds should break off into pieces, then to you that is a crazy belief? Show me some examples of this happening before or after 9-11

Buddy, you loooong since gone full retard.

It would break apart. The pieces would keep moving forward. Y'know - into the building.

What, do you really think they'd just fly outward?

I'd still like to know what your answer is, though - why does the film footage not show what you think it should?

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes cjlr's post
05-07-2013, 07:44 PM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 07:21 PM)cjlr Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 07:01 PM)I and I Wrote:  So if I believe a plane crashing into something at high speeds should break off into pieces, then to you that is a crazy belief? Show me some examples of this happening before or after 9-11

Buddy, you loooong since gone full retard.

It would break apart. The pieces would keep moving forward. Y'know - into the building.

What, do you really think they'd just fly outward?

I'd still like to know what your answer is, though - why does the film footage not show what you think it should?

Dude. Don't even bother with this dumbass. Leave him to his pathetic delusions and don't egrandize his ego at the expense of your time.

"IN THRUST WE TRUST"

"We were conservative Jews and that meant we obeyed God's Commandments until His rules became a royal pain in the ass."

- Joel Chastnoff, The 188th Crybaby Brigade
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2013, 08:31 PM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 07:44 PM)Carlo_The_Bugsmasher_Driver Wrote:  Dude. Don't even bother with this dumbass. Leave him to his pathetic delusions and don't aggrandize his ego at the expense of your time.

Oh, I know I should know better by now.

But I'm still actually curious as to his answer to my question.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2013, 09:31 PM
Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 08:31 PM)cjlr Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 07:44 PM)Carlo_The_Bugsmasher_Driver Wrote:  Dude. Don't even bother with this dumbass. Leave him to his pathetic delusions and don't aggrandize his ego at the expense of your time.

Oh, I know I should know better by now.

But I'm still actually curious as to his answer to my question.

I am curious as to how someone can admit they believe bush didn't lie about Iraqs WMD yet call other people retarded. You did notice that nobody on here defended your retarded ass about that issue.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-07-2013, 10:02 PM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 09:31 PM)I and I Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 08:31 PM)cjlr Wrote:  Oh, I know I should know better by now.

But I'm still actually curious as to his answer to my question.

I am curious as to how someone can admit they believe bush didn't lie about Iraqs WMD yet call other people retarded. You did notice that nobody on here defended your retarded ass about that issue.

You of all people shouldn't ridicule someone's argument because nobody else defended it...

[Image: 3cdac7eec8f6b059070d9df56f50a7ae.jpg]
Now with 40% more awesome.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes earmuffs's post
06-07-2013, 08:19 AM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 09:31 PM)I and I Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 08:31 PM)cjlr Wrote:  Oh, I know I should know better by now.

But I'm still actually curious as to his answer to my question.

I am curious as to how someone can admit they believe bush didn't lie about Iraqs WMD yet call other people retarded. You did notice that nobody on here defended your retarded ass about that issue.
It's quite amusing how you ask questions that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

You should just come out of the closet and admit you're a theist.

[Image: 21omssh.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 09:00 AM
Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(06-07-2013 08:19 AM)LostLocke Wrote:  
(05-07-2013 09:31 PM)I and I Wrote:  I am curious as to how someone can admit they believe bush didn't lie about Iraqs WMD yet call other people retarded. You did notice that nobody on here defended your retarded ass about that issue.
It's quite amusing how you ask questions that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

You should just come out of the closet and admit you're a theist.

This is the most conservative non skeptical forum I have ever been on.

I criticize theistic fascist nations and groups all the time like Israel and Saudi Arabia and I am attacked for it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 10:02 AM
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(05-07-2013 09:31 PM)I and I Wrote:  I am curious as to how someone can admit they believe bush didn't lie about Iraqs WMD yet call other people retarded. You did notice that nobody on here defended your retarded ass about that issue.

You're just precious.

That doesn't answer my question.
(05-07-2013 07:21 PM)cjlr Wrote:  I'd still like to know what your answer is, though - why does the film footage not show what you think it should?

We've been over that other shit before. You have nothing. We both acknowledge that statements were made which turned out not to be true. We disagree as to the reasons for saying them. Shall we refresh the minds of the audience members?

(25-06-2013 09:15 AM)cjlr Wrote:  I provided a tentative explanation, acknowledged as such, which seems to me to be a better accounting of events in question, keeping in mind two maxims on human behaviour: simple is preferable to complex, and fallability is preferable to malice. I also never stated that this was anything other than an excuse (a bad one) and does not mitigate the crimes committed. This seems to escape you.

You - despite being equally bound by the uncertainty of knowledge you've elsewhere been so keen on; neither you nor I know exactly what was going through people's minds over a decade ago - have conviction as unassailable as Cheyenne mountain and adhered to with the force of a thousand suns. You further insist on being confrontational, immmature, and insulting in all your interaction. Good luck with that attitude.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 10:28 AM (This post was last modified: 06-07-2013 10:47 AM by cjlr.)
RE: Newton's third law of motion. Is it true? Is it still held true today?
(06-07-2013 09:00 AM)I and I Wrote:  This is the most conservative non skeptical forum I have ever been on.

I criticize theistic fascist nations and groups all the time like Israel and Saudi Arabia and I am attacked for it.

Do you remember what we established, when last you brought up Israel? Y'know - the part where an internet comment section is, amazingly, not actually a platform for government policy? That Israel is a democracy? That for various reasons certain minority groups have disproportionate influence, allowing the racist and discriminatory policies of that state to be enforced?

(27-06-2013 02:10 PM)cjlr Wrote:  As for [Israel's January 2013 election (EDIT - January was the election, the government was formed in February)], ultra-Zionist and ultra-orthodox (which despite the overlap are not the same and can't always be lumped together) parties combined for about 25% of the vote. Those groups typically have extremely high turnout.

Nearly 20% of votes were for some variety of Socialist.

If Israeli Arabs (~20% of the country) voted in anywhere near the same proportion (Israeli Arab turnout is currently somewhere south of 50%) then between them and the Socialists (who are almost all supporters of unilateral drawback) would represent a much bigger constituency than the jerkwads on the far right. Unfortunately they're in a rut of self-defeating cynicism (they're not well-represented because they're not courted by parties because they don't vote because they're not well-represented etc) and that hasn't happened.

The Knesset runs on straight nation-wide proportional representation, with 120 seats and a 2% threshold for representation...

What you do, is spout off delusional and demented insanity and spew copypasta from extraordinarily suspect sources. You're slimy and full of shit, and you leave a big, greasy brown stain behind you wherever you go. I've long since run out of similes to describe your maniacal fetish for strawmen - no doubt well endowed with the cocks you also can't stop mentioning. You make me ashamed of my own socialism by mere association with the likes of you. You are evasive and disingenuous - you refuse to answer straight questions and you pull personal attacks from your ass (where you keep all your conversational tricks) whenever the slightest questioning of your controversial "sources" and even more specious "conclusions" arises. I fart in your general direction. Your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries. Go away, or I shall taunt you a second time.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like cjlr's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: