Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
02-10-2015, 02:13 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
From the article-

"Positive ratings post immediately; negative ratings are queued in a private inbox for 48 hours in case of disputes. If you haven’t registered for the site, and thus can’t contest those negative ratings, your profile only shows positive reviews."

It's bad enough when acquaintances make stuff up and smack talk you to your compatriots. At least not signing up for it would leave one off the hook. I don't have facebook, either.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-10-2015, 02:19 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
I don't see this as being harmonious with some privacy/confidentiality laws.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-10-2015, 02:32 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
(02-10-2015 02:19 PM)pablo Wrote:  I don't see this as being harmonious with some privacy/confidentiality laws.

There isn't so many in the US that apply to the situation. Some want to make them because areas in Europe do have it. Like the Right to be forgotten online where you can complain about negative things or certain types of things said about you online and they will legally get it so it doesn't show up in search engines.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-10-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
(02-10-2015 02:32 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  
(02-10-2015 02:19 PM)pablo Wrote:  I don't see this as being harmonious with some privacy/confidentiality laws.

There isn't so many in the US that apply to the situation. Some want to make them because areas in Europe do have it. Like the Right to be forgotten online where you can complain about negative things or certain types of things said about you online and they will legally get it so it doesn't show up in search engines.

So, if I wanted to slam someone who isn't a member, all I need to do is write horrible shit about them and mark it as a positive comment and it gets published unchecked?
From what I understand, only negative remarks are censored.
What about positives? Will each one be read to check for any shenanigans?
I see a billion members in their future.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-10-2015, 04:42 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
I predict that this will be a source of new and exciting libel suits.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Reltzik's post
02-10-2015, 05:00 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
(02-10-2015 04:42 PM)Reltzik Wrote:  I predict that this will be a source of new and exciting libel suits.

The lawyers are already salivating and ordering new Porsches, guaranteed.

We have enough youth. How about looking for the Fountain of Smart?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-10-2015, 11:24 PM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
No one's gonna use it Rolleyes

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-10-2015, 04:36 AM
RE: Peeple: a stupid idea for an app that literally no one wants
[Image: vRd3Fez.png]

living word
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: