Perfect mate thread.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-09-2012, 05:11 PM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(06-09-2012 05:06 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(06-09-2012 09:00 AM)Seasbury Wrote:  ... sex is only about 5% of the total (that might be generous), ...

Generous huh. Consider ... (Girly calculating) ... Blink ...

24 hours in day, 5%=72 minutes every day. Shocking

You are the fucking man Seasbury. Bowing That'd probably cover me for a year. I hope you're using lube or else somebody's gonna experience some chafing.

It's all about priorities Wink. Owning stock in astroglide helps too Big Grin

I said that was generous - we'll round it down to 3%...

"Like" my Facebook page
Brain Droppings Blog
[Image: images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT16Rq3dAcHhqiAsPC5xUC...oR0pEpxQZw]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Seasbury's post
06-09-2012, 05:24 PM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
Wow, I actually have no idea. How depressing is that Sad?!

Best and worst of Ferdinand .....
Best
Ferdinand: We don't really say 'theist' in Alabama. Here, you're either a Christian, or you're from Afghanistan and we fucking hate you.
Worst
Ferdinand: Everyone from British is so, like, fucking retarded.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Hughsie's post
06-09-2012, 08:09 PM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
Someone who isn't a religionist is probably the most important thing for me. After that I would like for them not to be into woo.

Other than that I'm not too picky. If we share at least a few interests that's perfect, and if we have different interests, that's also perfect because hopefully we wouldn't get tired of each other, due to always doing things together.

Contribute to the Community Resource!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Near's post
07-09-2012, 12:40 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
I'm still holding some hope I may find Mr Fucking Right one day but it's unlikely as I tend to choose poorly.
I really like Dom's post Thumbsup

Humankind Dodgy (a total misnomer)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like aurora's post
07-09-2012, 12:57 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(07-09-2012 12:40 AM)aurora Wrote:  I'm still holding some hope I may find Mr Fucking Right one day but it's unlikely as I tend to choose poorly.
I really like Dom's post Thumbsup

Mr Fucking Right!
Huh
Is sexual correctness one of your selection criteria?

You're from Melbourne right?

Good luck with that.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes DLJ's post
07-09-2012, 01:52 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(07-09-2012 12:57 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(07-09-2012 12:40 AM)aurora Wrote:  I'm still holding some hope I may find Mr Fucking Right one day but it's unlikely as I tend to choose poorly.
I really like Dom's post Thumbsup

Mr Fucking Right!
Huh
Is sexual correctness one of your selection criteria?

You're from Melbourne right?

Good luck with that.

No no no, that's not right as I'm a great teacher hehe

I'll need more than luck, DLJ

Humankind Dodgy (a total misnomer)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-09-2012, 02:04 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
Isn't it odd that we're having this conversation to begin with? You know, only 5% of mammals mate for life, and that doesn't include our closest cousins. And yet it's perfectly normal for us to feel compelled to find "the one". It is doubtful that we are a biologically monogamous species. Yet we seem to be socially monogamous (at least for the most part).

Humanity, curiouser and curiouser ... Consider

"But the point is, find somebody to love. Everything else is overrated." - HouseofCantor
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Smooshmonster's post
07-09-2012, 02:37 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(07-09-2012 01:52 AM)aurora Wrote:  
(07-09-2012 12:57 AM)DLJ Wrote:  Mr Fucking Right!
Huh
Is sexual correctness one of your selection criteria?

You're from Melbourne right?

Good luck with that.

No no no, that's not right as I'm a great teacher hehe

I'll need more than luck, DLJ

Like what? Divine intervention?

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-09-2012, 02:43 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(07-09-2012 02:04 AM)Smooshmonster Wrote:  Isn't it odd that we're having this conversation to begin with? You know, only 5% of mammals mate for life, and that doesn't include our closest cousins. And yet it's perfectly normal for us to feel compelled to find "the one". It is doubtful that we are a biologically monogamous species. Yet we seem to be socially monogamous (at least for the most part).

Humanity, curiouser and curiouser ... Consider

Just doubtful? I'd say certain.

I was monogamous while I was married. Although "monogamous" means having only one mate so I think I was zero-gamous.

Not my ex though... she was monogamous... meaning she ony had one lover at a time.

Now I am single again so there is no "contract" that restricts my multi-gamous activity... it seems much more natural.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like DLJ's post
07-09-2012, 02:48 AM
RE: Perfect mate thread.
(07-09-2012 02:37 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(07-09-2012 01:52 AM)aurora Wrote:  No no no, that's not right as I'm a great teacher hehe

I'll need more than luck, DLJ

Like what? Divine intervention?

If you call a miracle divine intervention then, yes Wink

Humankind Dodgy (a total misnomer)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: