Probability for existence of God



08112017, 03:25 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:08 PM)Henri Wrote: Creator can create universe of any size, ... Assumes facts not in evidence. You can't attempt calculations on the probability of a creator if you assume that the creator exists with certain attributes in the first place. No gods necessary. 

1 user Likes brunumb's post 
08112017, 03:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 08112017 03:35 PM by Bucky Ball.)




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:23 PM)Henri Wrote: 50/50, of course. Because I don't know if or how the coin is rigged. You can't be THAT stupid. IF there is a possibility the coin is rigged, then your calculation is WORTHLESS unless you have data. You have none, so your calculation is worthless. Quote:Likewise, as far as we know, base calculation for creator's existence is 50/50, and it is impossible to calculate it to be less then that, but when we make additional calculation with available measurements, we actually get almost 100% chance that God exists. Nope. False. You have no number to base anything on, as you have not demonstrated your concept is valid. You ASSERT your 50/50, but you have no evidence for it. You make it up. It could be (FAR) less than that, (it could be ZERO) if the concept is incoherent. You have no "available measurements" (from the conditions of "no universe"), and you have presented none, and validated none. You're a fraud, and a presuppositionalist. What a waste of time. Insufferable knowitall. It is objectively immoral to kill innocent babies. Please stick to the guilty babies. 

08112017, 03:34 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
Creators can't "create" UNLESS time already exists.
Where did time come from ? Creators can't "exist" unless reality includes nonexistence. Where did nonexistence come from ? Dude must be in like 6th Grade. Insufferable knowitall. It is objectively immoral to kill innocent babies. Please stick to the guilty babies. 

08112017, 03:34 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 02:32 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: "What's the difference between something you cannot prove to exist (nor ever be able to effectively test for since it's built into the system that it's impossible) and something that doesn't exist at all?" Difference is that former can exist but is currently not provable while latter doesn't exist. If that's all we know, there is 50/50 chance either way. Again, OP is about probability, not about proving with absolute proof the existence of God, since no human can do that. 

08112017, 03:35 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:08 PM)Henri Wrote: It's just what probability methods allow us to do in order to understand reality based upon incomplete information. Otherwise we wouldn't use probability methods. Your application of probability methods is nothing more than guesswork. That is not how probabilities are calculated. You DO need information and it must be directly related to the investigation under consideration. You can use classical probability calculations when you know all the possible outcomes and all the favourable outcomes, as in the rolling of dice. Or you can use long run proportion when you have a previous history of events and use them to make a prediction. If it has snowed on Christmas day in 20 of the last 100 years you could estimate the probability that it will snow on Christmas day this year as 20%. Your estimates have no validity and are just figures plucked from...... the air. No gods necessary. 

1 user Likes brunumb's post 
08112017, 03:36 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:23 PM)Henri Wrote: Likewise, as far as we know, base calculation for creator's existence is 50/50, and it is impossible to calculate it to be less then that, but when we make additional calculation with available measurements, we actually get almost 100% chance that God exists. As to the 50/50 base calculations that a creator exists, I will disagree with that. I'm also curious as to these "additional measurements" that you seem to think get you to nearly 100% that a god exists  what criteria do you base that on? But as if to knock me down, reality came around And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces 

08112017, 03:38 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 12:39 PM)Henri Wrote: Within reality we can reach, it is impossible to calculate less than 50/50 probability that creator who consciously created our universe exists. (Responding to the original post only. I might have further responses to the rest of the thread in later posts.) Well, you've convinced me of something. Specifically, you've convinced me that you are sorely in need of education the subjects of probability and statistics. Your points (2) through (4) don't really support your argument, so much as attempt to fend off potential counterarguments. You arrive at (5) with basically point (1) as your only contributing premise. That makes your argument essentially: Premise: Either the universe came into existences through conscious agency, or it didn't. Conclusion: Therefore the odds of a consciousness creating the universe are 50/50. Rubbish. THAT IS NOT HOW PROBABILITY IS CALCULATED. Let's illustrate why this is rubbish with a couple of examples. Either the universe was created by extradimensional reptilian overlords or it was not. Therefore, the odds that the Creator is a reptilian is 50/50. Either contrails contain mindcontrolling gas distributed by the government, or they do not. The odds of this is therefore 50/50. I'm going to roll a die. Either I get a 6, or I do not. Therefore, the odds of rolling a 6 are 50/50. By the same argument, the odds of rolling a 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are all 50/50, leading to a total probability of all options of 300%. In situations with a known weighting, such as rolling a fair die or picking a card at random from a deck, where each outcome is equally likely, we might make such a conclusion. But that sort of uniform distribution would need to be a premise and, moreover, a DEMONSTRATED premise. Without demonstrating uniform distribution, your conclusion is entirely unwarranted. Just because a coin has two sides, heads and tails, doesn't stop some con artist from using a weighted coin that always lands on heads. And we have no way of knowing the weighting of the two possibilities. Without starting off knowing the weighting of a random process, it's possible to discover it (within certain confidence intervals) through repeated experimentation and statistical analysis. For example, if we're unsure that a coin is fair, we might flip it a hundred times. If 90 of those flips were heads, we could be highly confident that it was NOT a fair coin, but rather one that had about a 90% probability of landing on heads with every flip. With some calculations of standard deviation, we could lay out a precise confidence interval. It's a pretty powerful tool when we can employ it. We cannot employ it here, for the simple reason that we can't look at multiple universes, determine whether a conscious god was behind each one, and calculate probability based on that. We don't get to examine multiple universes. By your own feeble efforts, we see that determining whether a god is behind the one universe we CAN examine is... prone to error, at best. The entire process is inapplicable. I don't know which calculations you are referring to that place the odds of a conscious creator god at virtually 100%. I've seen several such purported calculations, and they are generally worse rubbish than the rest of what you've said, ignoring several fundamental aspects of probability, as well as physics and alternate explanations. But hey, maybe you've found one I haven't seen. So go ahead and post it and I'll give it a critical review and see if it stands up to scrutiny. 

8 users Like Reltzik's post 
08112017, 03:39 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:34 PM)Henri Wrote:(08112017 02:32 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: "What's the difference between something you cannot prove to exist (nor ever be able to effectively test for since it's built into the system that it's impossible) and something that doesn't exist at all?" NO, it is not 50/50 chance. There are TWO outcomes, but that does not mean that each has an equal probability. That is where your whole argument breaks down. No gods necessary. 

08112017, 03:41 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 02:53 PM)true scotsman Wrote: I don't have to do any such thing. I don't have to prove that the contradictory does not exist. If contradictions could exist, there'd be no proving anything. What probability is there that a square circle exists? Can you calculate that? Well I don't need to calculate it to say that there is a zero probability that square circles exist. Point of proof is to be able to prove something. Even if you want to show that square circle doesn't exist, that can be mathematicall proven one way or the other. Otherwise it's just an opinion that seems obvious, but maybe isn't. Someone from previous generations of humans could say that it is impossible for written word to be transimitted through air, invisibly, over any distance, let alone over large distances. And that his or her opinion is a proof, because that's how they see things. But later, new knowledge and application proved that it's not the case. There is no contradiction that universe can be created either by conscious or unconscious means. Those are two encompassing options based on what we know about reality. 

08112017, 03:43 PM




RE: Probability for existence of God
(08112017 03:34 PM)Henri Wrote:(08112017 02:32 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: "What's the difference between something you cannot prove to exist (nor ever be able to effectively test for since it's built into the system that it's impossible) and something that doesn't exist at all?" No, there's no 50/50. It's not about something we can't simply prove to exist (at this time due to our own scientific limitations), it's about being impossible to ever prove exists. If you claim that god exists outside of space and time, and we do actually prove that there is nothing outside of space and time, you'll simply move that goal post and say well, it's another dimension of space and time....like the twilight zone. When that is eventually proven wrong, you'll likely move the goal post elsewhere. But as if to knock me down, reality came around And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)