Protesters take to the streets
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-11-2016, 01:54 PM (This post was last modified: 11-11-2016 01:58 PM by Vosur.)
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 01:35 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(11-11-2016 11:48 AM)Vosur Wrote:  No, it doesn't. As you said, the article disputes the sincerity of the endorsement, it does not dispute its existence. Therefore, it does not dispute that Will Quigg endorsed Hillary Clinton.

Edit: Oh and since you seem to think that I was unaware of the doubts surrounding its sincerity, here's some evidence for you that I knew about it before I even made the post you responded to (Firefox' browsing history orders the entries from most to least recent, so start at the bottom).

[Image: dmdtmm.png]

"This"? What's "this"?

"This" is you using a factoid in a misleading manner. Especially if you knew his statement wasn't sincere.

Shame on you.
How is it misleading? The entire point of mentioning that example, as you surely know since you read my post, is that you do not get to choose your endorsements. Whether or not his endorsement is sincere is completely irrelevant to my point. Why? Because Hillary Clinton, much like Trump, did not choose to get endorsed by the KKK whether it was sincere or not. Both of them disavowed the KKK and that is all they can do.

You have the bad habit of starting arguments for the sake of arguing, my friend. You often completely disregard the point and argue about trivial and irrelevant side issues.

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:57 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 01:54 PM)Vosur Wrote:  
(11-11-2016 01:35 PM)Chas Wrote:  "This" is you using a factoid in a misleading manner. Especially if you knew his statement wasn't sincere.

Shame on you.
How is it misleading? The entire point of mentioning that example, as you surely know since you read my post, is that you do not get to choose your endorsements. Whether or not his endorsement is sincere is completely irrelevant to my point.

You have the bad habit of starting arguments for the sake of arguing, my friend.

The endorsement wasn't real so you mentioning it at all is misleading.

That you miss the point does not invalidate my argument.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 01:43 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(11-11-2016 01:39 PM)Chas Wrote:  And I lived through martial law. I don't want to ever see that again.

[Image: 12767cansoldier.jpg]

[Image: 9780773538016.jpg]

Are you one of them there Canadian refugees that's gonna get sent back or placed in an internment camp?

Yeah, they'll probably deport all us frostbacks. Weeping

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 01:59 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 01:57 PM)Chas Wrote:  The endorsement wasn't real so you mentioning it at all is misleading.
That's an opinion, not a fact.

(11-11-2016 01:57 PM)Chas Wrote:  That you miss the point does not invalidate my argument.
Your point being that you think the endorsement wasn't sincere so I shouldn't have mentioned it?

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 02:04 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 01:59 PM)Vosur Wrote:  
(11-11-2016 01:57 PM)Chas Wrote:  The endorsement wasn't real so you mentioning it at all is misleading.
That's an opinion, not a fact.

Supported by all the evidence.

Quote:
(11-11-2016 01:57 PM)Chas Wrote:  That you miss the point does not invalidate my argument.
Your point being that you think the endorsement wasn't sincere so I shouldn't have mentioned it?

Yes.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
More divisive talk.

Of course half the country is terrified.

Had the election gone the other way, it would have been the same thing. Except probably with guns like several militias promised.

The president elect needs to address their fears and not be limited to 140 characters. And not whine....

That's what I expect of a president.

And if Clinton had won, I'd expect no less from her also.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 6 users Like Momsurroundedbyboys's post
11-11-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
The dreadful, depressing dilemma is that I am glad that Clinton lost and horrified that Trump won.Shocking

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
11-11-2016, 02:29 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
Cool.


Attached File(s) Thumbnail(s)
   

"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Lord Dark Helmet
[Image: 25397spaceballs.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 02:29 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  Cool.

You really don't get it?!

I'm sure you would have protested if the election went the other way.

That's the point. If trump lost that side threatened civil war. You alluded to that yourself in that other thread.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Momsurroundedbyboys's post
11-11-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Protesters take to the streets
(11-11-2016 03:23 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  
(11-11-2016 02:29 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  Cool.

You really don't get it?!

I'm sure you would have protested if the election went the other way.

That's the point. If trump lost that side threatened civil war. You alluded to that yourself in that other thread.

I think you are giving that side to much credit. They same that all the time and nothing happens.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: