Question about the Woman's March.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
23-01-2017, 02:50 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
It's simply showing the conservatives that the progressives will be voting them out of office if stepped on too hard.

The conservatives have a chance - for 2 years.

The GOP needs to get it's shit together despite controlling everything now - because in two year's time they will be judged.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Dom's post
23-01-2017, 06:19 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 02:50 PM)Dom Wrote:  It's simply showing the conservatives that the progressives will be voting them out of office if stepped on too hard.

The conservatives have a chance - for 2 years.

The GOP needs to get it's shit together despite controlling everything now - because in two year's time they will be judged.

Senate class one is up for reelection in 2018. These midterms will be brutal for democrats. The republicans very likely could end up with a filibuster proof majority. The democrats have a ton of seats up for relection in states Trump won or they are in red states like Montana.

http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystal...y-exposed/

"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Lord Dark Helmet
[Image: 25397spaceballs.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 02:42 PM)jason_delisle Wrote:  
(22-01-2017 09:58 PM)ShadowProject Wrote:  Bingo.

I have seen enough men posing this exact question on posts about the march to surmise they don't truly want to understand the reasons.

It's just a nicer way of saying STFU feminists, go home and shut your fat mouths.
I really don't see that as the case. However, I did find a link that definitely helped to better answer the question. Here it is.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.vox.com/p...sm-demands
Then you need to embrace social nihilism.

Or do you ponder why a few African American women were motivated to start it or why the majority of people join along?

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 06:35 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 06:19 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  These midterms will be brutal for democrats.

Trump is not a republican.
If they take 20 million people's health insurance away, the Repubs will have a hard time. You NEVER provide any reasoning for your crystal ball reads. Its FAR FAR too early to say ANYTHING about the midterms.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 06:47 PM (This post was last modified: 23-01-2017 06:52 PM by Lord Dark Helmet.)
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 06:35 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(23-01-2017 06:19 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  These midterms will be brutal for democrats.

Trump is not a republican.
If they take 20 million people's health insurance away, the Repubs will have a hard time. You NEVER provide any reasoning for your crystal ball reads. Its FAR FAR too early to say ANYTHING about the midterms.

I provided a link to a fairly reliable, neutral source. You're right, nobody knows what will happen with 100% certainty. All they can do is look at history and the data in front of them. But right now, it looks bad for democrats. This is because the democrats not only have to defend seats in their normally safe states (where upsets happen and they could lose a few or they could win them all back), they have to fight for reelection in traditionally red states like Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Indiana, and then try to win in states that Trump won like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida. This is a daunting task, and if you look into it, even liberal leaning sources say the same thing.

"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Lord Dark Helmet
[Image: 25397spaceballs.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 06:47 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  
(23-01-2017 06:35 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Trump is not a republican.
If they take 20 million people's health insurance away, the Repubs will have a hard time. You NEVER provide any reasoning for your crystal ball reads. Its FAR FAR too early to say ANYTHING about the midterms.

I provided a link to a fairly reliable, neutral source. You're right, nobody knows what will happen with 100% certainty. All they can do is look at history and the data in front of them. But right now, it looks bad for democrats. This is because the democrats not only have to defend seats in their normally safe states (where upsets happen and they could lose a few or they could win them all back), they have to fight for reelection in traditionally red states like Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Indiana, and then try to win in states that Trump won like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida. This is a daunting task, and if you look into it, even liberal leaning sources say the same thing.

Bullshit.
The country has FAR more Democrats than Republicans. There is no case to be made that says "it looks bad for Democrats". If the Republican do what they say, the Dems won't have to "fight" for anything. There has NEVER in American history been the sort of reaction we saw yesterday. You bullshit is nothing but wishful thinking masquerading as "analysis".

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 07:33 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 07:19 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(23-01-2017 06:47 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  I provided a link to a fairly reliable, neutral source. You're right, nobody knows what will happen with 100% certainty. All they can do is look at history and the data in front of them. But right now, it looks bad for democrats. This is because the democrats not only have to defend seats in their normally safe states (where upsets happen and they could lose a few or they could win them all back), they have to fight for reelection in traditionally red states like Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Indiana, and then try to win in states that Trump won like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida. This is a daunting task, and if you look into it, even liberal leaning sources say the same thing.

Bullshit.
The country has FAR more Democrats than Republicans. There is no case to be made that says "it looks bad for Democrats". If the Republican do what they say, the Dems won't have to "fight" for anything. There has NEVER in American history been the sort of reaction we saw yesterday. You bullshit is nothing but wishful thinking masquerading as "analysis".

And what exactly will 10 million democrats that are concentrated in New York, California, New Jersey and Massachusetts do to affect the vote in Montana, Ohio, W Virginia etc?

I would just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/se...rms-231516

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2...terms.html

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/j...term-elec/

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_586d4f...3a08fab52f

http://observer.com/2016/12/2018-us-sena...tic-party/

"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Lord Dark Helmet
[Image: 25397spaceballs.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 07:54 PM (This post was last modified: 23-01-2017 08:05 PM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 07:33 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  
(23-01-2017 07:19 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Bullshit.
The country has FAR more Democrats than Republicans. There is no case to be made that says "it looks bad for Democrats". If the Republican do what they say, the Dems won't have to "fight" for anything. There has NEVER in American history been the sort of reaction we saw yesterday. You bullshit is nothing but wishful thinking masquerading as "analysis".

And what exactly will 10 million democrats that are concentrated in New York, California, New Jersey and Massachusetts do to affect the vote in Montana, Ohio, W Virginia etc?

I would just stop. You're embarrassing yourself.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/se...rms-231516

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2...terms.html

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/j...term-elec/

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_586d4f...3a08fab52f

http://observer.com/2016/12/2018-us-sena...tic-party/

Obama won by FAR more votes both times than your boy got.
Your boy lost the popular vote.
There has NEVER been a post inauguration rally such as we saw yesterday.
The only one who's embarrassing himself, is Dork Osama Lord.
The VERY people who said Trump could never win are NOW the people you use to support your bullshit. But thanks for your Crystal Ball readings. Your ball is "vast".
Laugh out loadLaugh out loadLaugh out loadLaugh out load

Your boy suffers from paranoid delusions. He's STILL saying there were 3-5 million votes illegal votes cast in the election, and there is NOT ONE shred of evidence for that.
He is mentally unhinged.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2017, 08:23 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 06:47 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  
(23-01-2017 06:35 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Trump is not a republican.
If they take 20 million people's health insurance away, the Repubs will have a hard time. You NEVER provide any reasoning for your crystal ball reads. Its FAR FAR too early to say ANYTHING about the midterms.

I provided a link to a fairly reliable, neutral source. You're right, nobody knows what will happen with 100% certainty. All they can do is look at history and the data in front of them. But right now, it looks bad for democrats. This is because the democrats not only have to defend seats in their normally safe states (where upsets happen and they could lose a few or they could win them all back), they have to fight for reelection in traditionally red states like Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Indiana, and then try to win in states that Trump won like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida. This is a daunting task, and if you look into it, even liberal leaning sources say the same thing.
Indeed how long does "tradition" last? Aren't they traditionally blue states before the tradition of calling one side red or one side blue a traditional split... but 30 years before that they were traditionally red states if you go by that former contrast of what the democratic party was and color distinction was.

You know traditions change right? Generally a lot of the types of atheists here realize that because it's noticible in the awareness of religious topics.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
27-01-2017, 08:04 PM
RE: Question about the Woman's March.
(23-01-2017 06:47 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  But right now, it looks bad for democrats. This is because the democrats not only have to defend seats in their normally safe states (where upsets happen and they could lose a few or they could win them all back), they have to fight for reelection in traditionally red states like Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Indiana, and then try to win in states that Trump won like Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Florida. This is a daunting task, and if you look into it, even liberal leaning sources say the same thing.

I think you're forgetting two salient points here. Firstly, Drumpf lost the primary vote to Clinton by nearly 3 million votes—which is an indicator of his unpopularity amongst the wider electorate. If it wasn't for the centuries old, outmoded existence of the Electoral College system, Drumpf would've been easily beaten. Which raises the question of why Americans don't dispense with it, after all the people elect their State governors by popular vote—why not their president?

Secondly, the damage that the orange grub is already wreaking politically, militarily, and economically will only get worse in the coming two years. And even droves of rusted-on Republicans will shift their allegiances. Particularly in Congress—in order to save their own skins.

I'm a creationist... I believe that man created God.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: