Radical Feminism
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
10-08-2014, 04:15 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(10-08-2014 04:01 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  
(10-08-2014 03:50 PM)Michael_Tadlock Wrote:  I wouldn't say that men have to atone for anything just because they are men. In all other respects though, those points, while not the particularly well conceived, are all justifiable with good arguments.

For those unfamiliar with some of the terminology "cis" (pronounced ceese) is a person who is mentally of the same gender they were born with physically. I am not a fan of the term, but it has taken off in some segments of the LGBQT and feminists communities. "White privilege", another term I am not particular fond off (I take objection to the word "privilege") means the advantageous state of being white in american (in this context).

None of those points are at all good. You are not obliged to be attracted to anyone.

On that last point you are right, no, no you're not.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Michael_Tadlock's post
10-08-2014, 04:24 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(10-08-2014 04:15 PM)Michael_Tadlock Wrote:  
(10-08-2014 04:01 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  None of those points are at all good. You are not obliged to be attracted to anyone.

On that last point you are right, no, no you're not.

So what the fuck? You are obliged to be attracted to people?

You really are retarded. No one has to like anyone. Personal freedom; you can like whoever you want. Demanding that someone like someone is a denial of the most basic of personal freedom. It is the exact same attitude behind arranged marriage.

Paleoliberal • English Nationalist • Zionist • Rightist • Anti-Islam • Neoconservative • Republican • Linguistic Revivalist and Purist

Happily Divorced from the Left!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2014, 04:33 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(10-08-2014 04:24 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  
(10-08-2014 04:15 PM)Michael_Tadlock Wrote:  On that last point you are right, no, no you're not.

So what the fuck? You are obliged to be attracted to people?

You really are retarded. No one has to like anyone. Personal freedom; you can like whoever you want. Demanding that someone like someone is a denial of the most basic of personal freedom. It is the exact same attitude behind arranged marriage.

You reading skills suck. He said he agreed with you and in context No you are not obligated to be attracted to anyone.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Revenant77x's post
10-08-2014, 04:34 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(10-08-2014 04:33 PM)Revenant77x Wrote:  
(10-08-2014 04:24 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  So what the fuck? You are obliged to be attracted to people?

You really are retarded. No one has to like anyone. Personal freedom; you can like whoever you want. Demanding that someone like someone is a denial of the most basic of personal freedom. It is the exact same attitude behind arranged marriage.

You reading skills suck. He said he agreed with you and in context No you are not obligated to be attracted to anyone.

Oh, sorry then.

Paleoliberal • English Nationalist • Zionist • Rightist • Anti-Islam • Neoconservative • Republican • Linguistic Revivalist and Purist

Happily Divorced from the Left!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2014, 09:28 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(09-08-2014 01:06 PM)Drunkin Druid Wrote:  
(09-08-2014 10:58 AM)cjlr Wrote:  "Radical feminists" are the demons misogynists invented to feel better about maintaining their own prejudices.

But is a radical feminist the same as a feminazi?
Are we defining "radical" as 'getting to the root(fundamentalist)' or as 'extreme?'
At any rate I doubt that the term was designed by misogynists to demonize anyone. In fact there are those who believe in the superiority of women. I know this because I've met one or two in my time. There are all kinds of people with all kinds of ideas both good and bad. To ignore that there are man hating women out there is to ignore reality.
It takes all kinds to make a world.
Some proverb..... I think

For literally anything one cares to imagine, someone believes it.
(this is but a restatement of Poe's law)

That does not make it relevant.

Painting the Black Panthers as the face of the civil rights movement was awfully convenient for parts of the establishment, too. Did they exist? Yes. Did they have valid concerns? Yes. Were they batshit crazy? Also yes. Were they remotely relevant? No.

[Image: strawfeministssm.png]

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 9 users Like cjlr's post
10-08-2014, 09:42 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
I thought radical feminist were weird until I saw that they burn bras I am now on their side.

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOW_Ioi2wtuPa88FvBmnBgQ my youtube
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2014, 09:36 PM
Re: Radical Feminism
If you're resulting to Tumblr or Reddit for an example you're digging for neddles in a cesspool covered haystack.

It's a realm of the internet noted for extreme stances and anonymity. There's a case for anything if you search hard enough for it. It's worthless and child-like to give credence to a off chance social opinion.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes ClydeLee's post
11-08-2014, 11:38 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
You don't have to identify as a feminist. You can be a humanist. It works and there are reasons for it.

Porn is literally the objectification of anyone it. Its not only objectifying women, but men as well. There are so many different kinds of porn.

BDSM. A man or woman takes control of another man or woman. Is objectification bad in porn? How could you have porn without objectification? Go to any porn website and there are literally thousands of genres concerning porn. Its wild.


I don't think we live in patriarchal society. I think we live in a society that favours rich people. If we lived in a patriarchal society, there would be no women power in any way. There is obviously discrimination that needs to be dealt with and women have many issues that need to be dealt with, but I do not think its a patriarchal society.

Many rad fems do hate men. Especially when you have a many pot them calling for male castration day, calling us all potential rapists by stereotyping us as such, and other things. They essentially ruined feminism.

“Take the risk of thinking for yourself, much more happiness, truth, beauty, and wisdom will come to you that way.

-Christopher Hitchens
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Just Another Atheist's post
11-08-2014, 11:45 PM
RE: Radical Feminism
(11-08-2014 11:38 PM)Just Another Atheist Wrote:  Many rad fems do hate men. Especially when you have a many pot them calling for male castration day, calling us all potential rapists by stereotyping us as such, and other things. They essentially ruined feminism.

No, assholes ruined feminism by falsely portraying the movement as way more radical than it actually is.

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
12-08-2014, 07:20 AM
RE: Radical Feminism
(11-08-2014 11:45 PM)morondog Wrote:  
(11-08-2014 11:38 PM)Just Another Atheist Wrote:  Many rad fems do hate men. Especially when you have a many pot them calling for male castration day, calling us all potential rapists by stereotyping us as such, and other things. They essentially ruined feminism.

No, assholes ruined feminism by falsely portraying the movement as way more radical than it actually is.

Both. There really are vile rad-fems, and there really is too much attention paid to them.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: