Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
21-08-2012, 03:10 PM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
You do know black holes are more of a theory right?
Like they're called black holes because light appears to just vanish into them (or well, everything for that matter) which gives the impression of some sort of sink hole.

Scientist openly admit they know next to nothing about them.

But they do exist, just may be 'sink hole' like or may not.

I don't talk gay, I don't walk gay, it's like people don't even know I'm gay unless I'm blowing them.
[Image: 10h27hu.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
21-08-2012, 05:10 PM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.0861v2.pdf

Looks like Netherlands and Canada to me... dang Aussies. Big Grin

[Image: 10289811_592837817482059_8815379025397103823_n.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes houseofcantor's post
21-08-2012, 06:23 PM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
This is the Big Bang Theory, yes? It's how I've been taught to understand it.





"Ain't got no last words to say, yellow streak right up my spine. The gun in my mouth was real and the taste blew my mind."

"We see you cry. We turn your head. Then we slap your face. We see you try. We see you fail. Some things never change."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Buddy Christ's post
21-08-2012, 06:49 PM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
(20-08-2012 06:00 PM)Erxomai Wrote:  ID freaks will love this. They're using Genesis language to suggest there was no form and then the universe crystallized...just as genesis 1 says the earth was formless and void.

Yeah, I caught that one, too. I think "formless" is supposed to be more along the lines of...nothing can be observed to be "next to" anything in particular, in that phase. Points in space are not localized. I don't even know how to phrase what I'm thinking.

Frankly, to parse any of the sentences on this Wikipedia page describing Quantum Graphity would take an advanced degree in abstract math. Sadcryface Guess I better get used to the idea that I'll never understand the world.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2012, 08:01 AM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
(21-08-2012 06:49 PM)rook2004 Wrote:  
(20-08-2012 06:00 PM)Erxomai Wrote:  ID freaks will love this. They're using Genesis language to suggest there was no form and then the universe crystallized...just as genesis 1 says the earth was formless and void.

Yeah, I caught that one, too. I think "formless" is supposed to be more along the lines of...nothing can be observed to be "next to" anything in particular, in that phase. Points in space are not localized. I don't even know how to phrase what I'm thinking.

Frankly, to parse any of the sentences on this Wikipedia page describing Quantum Graphity would take an advanced degree in abstract math. Sadcryface Guess I better get used to the idea that I'll never understand the world.

the reason that paper seems so confusing is the combining of disciplines.

Gravity is of the mass/environment entanglement.

All over the world many physicist and mathematicians are proposing.

The problem is in combining relativity with mechanics
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2012, 08:33 AM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
I hope I live to see the day that either, or yet another, theory becomes fact.

Or... could a theory be introduced maliciously to discredit the teaching of scientific theories in schools?

Aspiring optimist
Eternal Pragmatist.
With the uncanny ability to see all sides in every argument.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-08-2012, 08:57 AM
RE: Rewrite the Big Bang Theory???
(22-08-2012 08:33 AM)Caveman Wrote:  I hope I live to see the day that either, or yet another, theory becomes fact.

that's a what the quest is.

think about it, man(kind) wakes up conscious and wants to comprehend.

mankind creates words, so now previous 'experiences' are being recorded.

gravity wasnt even a word when ahkanatan was monotheizing the region.

words are mankinds creations and knowledge is evolving (itself) over time.

ie... we all want to see a fact.

Here's one: 'we' mankind are children of nature. ie....literally of 'atoms and energy'

call me a liar!

Quote:Or... could a theory be introduced maliciously to discredit the teaching of scientific theories in schools?
hah....

but this aint kansas, toto!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: