Roman historian on Jesus
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
10-08-2014, 08:26 PM
RE: Roman historian on Jesus
"This historian said this"...........Um look at the date first off, still after the fact so cannot be considered a first hand account.

Secondly, for example If I get my picture taken with Donald Trump does that mean he can fly around on a broom or shoot his own head off with a shotgun and regrow it?

The alleged "Historians" were hardly that, there is a difference between a collegiate scholastic historian and an apologist arguing for a position. Historians simply report, like a objective journalists. The after the fact outside sources of that time were looking for a hero and were sympathizers to the new movement.

But regardless even if we found the actual body and DNA of a man named Jesus, he would not be a god or a man/god, he merely would have been a man who started a new religion.

Poetry by Brian37(poems by an atheist) Also on Facebook as BrianJames Rational Poet and Twitter Brianrrs37
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: