Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
05-01-2012, 04:42 PM
Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-m...shire-poll

Romney had been as much as 29 points up. Now is only 14 up. Santorum in a distant 3rd.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes germanyt's post
05-01-2012, 04:45 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes kingschosen's post
05-01-2012, 04:46 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:45 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.


I don't think I've ever been this excited over an election year. Never before have I felt like the candidate I want could actually win.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2012, 04:49 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:45 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.

I think it's quite the opposite.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2012, 04:52 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:49 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(05-01-2012 04:45 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.

I think it's quite the opposite.

I don't think so. Obama would probably manhandle Romney on the issues. Ron Paul is about as consistent as they get and has very loyal supporters. Registered Republicans aren't going to vote for Obama so they are guaranteed. Paul can carry far more independent vote than Romney IMO.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2012, 04:55 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:49 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(05-01-2012 04:45 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.

I think it's quite the opposite.

I completely agree it is the opposite.

Americans get "scared" by Ron Paul and all his "wacky" ideas of libertarianism and free rights, in the land of the free no? It's stupid but that is what it is founded on, stupidity. Paul stays consistent on issues but he does on the ones they don't like because of fear imbedded into them in the past. "free drugs, getting troops out of the middle east, etc."

Romney may not be liked now, but fewer republicans are gonna avoid voting for him when it comes to getting rid of that "socialist muslam" I've heard plenty of this already from my family and others to know it is real.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2012, 05:21 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:55 PM)ClydeLee Wrote:  
(05-01-2012 04:49 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(05-01-2012 04:45 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  This is such good news.

Romney is cannon fodder for the Democrats... Dr. Paul will be a much tougher candidate.

I think it's quite the opposite.

I completely agree it is the opposite.

Americans get "scared" by Ron Paul and all his "wacky" ideas of libertarianism and free rights, in the land of the free no? It's stupid but that is what it is founded on, stupidity. Paul stays consistent on issues but he does on the ones they don't like because of fear imbedded into them in the past. "free drugs, getting troops out of the middle east, etc."

Romney may not be liked now, but fewer republicans are gonna avoid voting for him when it comes to getting rid of that "socialist muslam" I've heard plenty of this already from my family and others to know it is real.

They won't have an opportunity to avoid voting for him if his name isn't on the ballot. If Paul wins the nomination then Obama loses. If Romney wins the nomination then Obama wins the election because enough Republicans will still write in Ron Pauls name and cost Romney the election.
Interestingly enough, http://www.foxnews.com/ doesn't mention Ron Pauls name one time in any relavent article. RP is 13 points up on Santorum in NH and gets no mention in an article about fundraising for NH.

Faux News, I am irrate.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-01-2012, 05:34 PM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 04:52 PM)germanyt Wrote:  Registered Republicans aren't going to vote for Obama so they are guaranteed.

Well, that is how Obama got elected the first time. Registered Republicans voted for him then, and it looks like they will now too. I am a registered Republican who will be voting for him. I looked hard but did not see any candidates that I thought would be an improvement over Obama.

Something, Or Someone Is Really Out There!
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-01-2012, 08:16 AM
RE: Ron Paul closing the gap in New Hampshire.
(05-01-2012 05:34 PM)Infidel Wrote:  
(05-01-2012 04:52 PM)germanyt Wrote:  Registered Republicans aren't going to vote for Obama so they are guaranteed.

Well, that is how Obama got elected the first time. Registered Republicans voted for him then, and it looks like they will now too. I am a registered Republican who will be voting for him. I looked hard but did not see any candidates that I thought would be an improvement over Obama.

Actually record youth turnout is what got Obama elected. That and 99% of the black vote. Republicans turned out in near record lows because they didn't feel strongly about McCain.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect.”

-Mark Twain
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: