Science against evolution
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
17-10-2012, 09:34 AM (This post was last modified: 06-02-2013 12:42 AM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Science against evolution
(17-10-2012 08:59 AM)theophilus Wrote:  How did life come into existence? There are two possible explanations. One is that natural processes brought about the existence of simple, single-celled organisms and its descendants evolved to produce all the forms of life that exist today. The other is that it was created by God.

It is widely believed that science has proved that the first explanation is correct and those who reject it do so only because it contradicts their religious beliefs. This belief is false. Science is the attempt to find out things by means of observation and testing. The origin of life hasn't been observed and there is no way it can be tested scientifically.

The reality is that there are scientific facts that aren't compatible with the commonly accepted theory of evolution. Here is a site where you can find out about some of these facts:

http://scienceagainstevolution.info/index.shtml

Each month a newsletter is published with new information. Here is this month's newsletter.

http://scienceagainstevolution.info/new.shtml

It includes an excellent article about how to teach evolution.

http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v17i1f.htm

Here is an index of all the material on the site.

http://scienceagainstevolution.info/topics.htm


Argument for Ignorance, God of the gaps, OR in modern parlance : "Creation, yeah, I got god. I got an app for that".

Absolute 100% bullshit. What's your problem theophilus ? Can't you argue a point on your own ? You need to refer people to biased websites ? Give me any argument for your Creationist crap, and I'll shoot every one down. There are NOT "two explanations". There could be countless explanations, including the 'seeding" proposition from either comets or asteroids. Your God theory, is the LEAST probable of any of them all. The process of hydrophobic molecular structures eventually turned into cells which could reproduce, and evolve, has been demonstrated in a few possible ways, and is well known to Biologists and science. This process has been observed in the lab, and reproduced many times.

The fact is you NEED this argument to support the preposterous crap that your holy book is literally true. You think your idiot god doesn't wonder why you have so little faith in him, that you need this sort of weak support to believe in him, instead of a real relationship with him ? You obviously have no relationship with your imaginary friend, as well as have no knowledge of Science, Biology, Chemistry, Geology, Probability Theory, Chaos Theory, etc etc. The default position, if we do not have complete knowledge is NOT "oh god did it". The default position is "we don't know yet". You actually think your stupid god does not know you relegate him to an "ignorance plug in", for your unanswered questions ? You actually think so little of your god, that you place him on the dangerous cliff-edge of falling off, by ANY other possible credible explanation that happens to come along. I'm sure your god is REAL pleased about how liitle you think of him. What a pathetic excuse for a theist. Your god is a plug-in, to finish your model.

And BTW, why would you advertise your fake Book of Acts with that name ? The supposed writer of it changed his mind, about more than one subject, thus proving his original statements were either NOT made by the same self admitted liars, (which Paul and Luke were), or they were not inspired.

For whatever Psychological NEED, you NEED to explain all of the world TODAY. You NEED all the answers RIGHT NOW, like a two year old, having a tantrum in the grocery store. What this is all about is Psychology, not science or religion.

You actually DO believe in Evolution. If you or one of your family was in prison, and you or they could get out by the use of DNA, YOU would use it. DNA proves Evolution. You DO believe in evolution, if you have ever taken an antibiotic. You are just too ignorant of Biology and Genetics to get why that is.

BTW, Clyde, your website is a pathetic exercise in confirmation bias.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein Certified Ancient Astronaut Theorist and Levitating Yogi, CAAT-LY.
Living daily with the high tragedy of being #2 on Laramie Hirsch's ignore list.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 13 users Like Bucky Ball's post
Post Reply

Messages In This Thread
Science against evolution - theophilus - 17-10-2012, 08:59 AM
RE: Science against evolution - theophilus - 19-12-2012, 10:52 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 19-12-2012, 11:10 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 19-12-2012, 01:54 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Simon Moon - 20-12-2012, 05:19 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NeonMoment - 17-10-2012, 09:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Humakt - 17-10-2012, 11:24 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-10-2012, 11:42 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 17-10-2012, 12:31 PM
RE: Science against evolution - fstratzero - 20-12-2012, 06:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 17-10-2012, 03:21 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 19-12-2012, 11:13 AM
RE: Science against evolution - kim - 23-04-2013, 09:30 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 23-04-2013, 09:20 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Starcrash - 19-12-2012, 08:11 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NoahsFarce - 19-12-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 19-12-2012, 11:21 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NoahsFarce - 21-12-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 22-12-2012, 02:39 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 20-12-2012, 06:24 PM
RE: Science against evolution - fstratzero - 20-12-2012, 06:38 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 11:57 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:02 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 12:20 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:22 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:13 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:34 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:32 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 12:45 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 01:15 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 19-01-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 19-01-2013, 04:44 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 01:22 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 06:09 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 20-01-2013, 10:04 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 12:03 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 21-01-2013, 02:13 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 21-01-2013, 02:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:31 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 16-01-2013, 01:18 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 01:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 03:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:29 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:39 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:43 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:36 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:40 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:47 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:54 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:59 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:56 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:57 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 03:04 PM
RE: Science against evolution - dj-hato - 16-01-2013, 03:21 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 17-01-2013, 05:49 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:03 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:05 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:14 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:18 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:21 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 17-01-2013, 09:33 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:39 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:24 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 02:56 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:29 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:44 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 18-01-2013, 03:47 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:57 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 18-01-2013, 03:12 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 18-01-2013, 03:11 PM
RE: Science against evolution - tkbxb - 17-01-2013, 04:24 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:22 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 17-01-2013, 11:16 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 12:14 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 12:57 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:32 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:50 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:58 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:06 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 18-01-2013, 02:07 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:12 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:18 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 18-01-2013, 03:40 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 04:02 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 20-01-2013, 05:54 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Hafnof - 20-01-2013, 06:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Question - 20-01-2013, 02:52 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 21-01-2013, 12:07 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 21-01-2013, 04:57 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 21-01-2013, 04:06 PM
RE: Science against evolution - jamiejuggs - 22-01-2013, 09:00 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 28-01-2013, 03:05 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 23-02-2013, 02:58 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 10:11 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 04:03 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 04:22 PM
Forum Jump: