Science against evolution
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
21-01-2013, 04:54 AM
RE: Science against evolution
(21-01-2013 03:52 AM)Aseptic Skeptic Wrote:  
(21-01-2013 12:07 AM)Filox Wrote:  And this is why I love the word - fucktard.


I think this is the stupidest possible answer one could possibly imagine. WTF are you talking about, what aether and what Atheistic science establishment?

Can you make up something else, please?

Oddly, AtheismExposed didn't make it up. Albert Michelson and Edward Murley made it up.

What AtheismExposed did do was completely misunderstand the experiment and the results. And when I say "misunderstand" I mean he got it exactly 180 degrees backward. This experiment demonstrated that the earth WAS NOT suspended in aether. In fact, the experiment became what has been called the most famous failed experiment in history:

Actually, since even reading the first paragraph on Wikipedia could have provided the truth for our friend AthesimExposed, I'm going to assume he never even looked it up but rather he midlessly parroted the misinformation some other mindless Christian apologist spoonfed him.

The Michelson–Morley experiment was performed in 1887 by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio. It attempted to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The negative results are generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, in which the stationary aether concept has no role. The experiment has been referred to as "the moving-off point for the theoretical aspects of the Second Scientific Revolution
Ahem, not so.

Quote: Most scientists know about the
Michelson-Morely experiment. It was carried out to check that the
velocity of the earth round the sun was about 30km/sec as it moved
through the aether. When it found hardly any movement at all, the result
stunned the scientific community! Little of this reached the ears of
the public and this result had to be "explained away".

There is a simple model that can be pictured to explain the reason for the experiment.

Imagine that you are on a lake in a small boat with a very quiet
engine (the earth), and not far away is a huge liner (the
sun). You are at the centre of the lake and the shore is a long way off
but you can see mountains on it etc. You notice that
the shore (the stars) is going past the large ship fairly quickly, and
you realise that either (i) you are circling the large ship OR (ii) the
large ship is circling you - and you cannot immediately tell which one
is circling which.You know the distance between the two ships and timing
how long it takes for the shore to make a complete circle (1 year), you
can say that either the large ship is going
round you at 30mph or you are going round it at that speed.

There is a very simple test that will tell you which one is circling which. What can you do to find out???

The answer is very simple.


You put your hand in the water (the aether)!!!


If you are moving through the water, then it is you going round the large ship, and you can check your speed through the
water to see if it is 30 mph. If it is, then the large ship must be stationary.
HOWEVER, if you find that you are stationary in the water, then it must be the large ship that is GOING ROUND YOU.

The MM experiment showed that the earth was (almost) stationary! So they had to invent the Fitzgerald-Lorentz contraction


Check out my YouTube channel for more videos and information Smile

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQ5PX9Y...1uwXxWwQ6w
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply

Messages In This Thread
Science against evolution - theophilus - 17-10-2012, 08:59 AM
RE: Science against evolution - theophilus - 19-12-2012, 10:52 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 19-12-2012, 11:10 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 19-12-2012, 01:54 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Simon Moon - 20-12-2012, 05:19 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NeonMoment - 17-10-2012, 09:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Humakt - 17-10-2012, 11:24 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-10-2012, 11:42 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 17-10-2012, 12:31 PM
RE: Science against evolution - fstratzero - 20-12-2012, 06:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 17-10-2012, 03:21 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 19-12-2012, 11:13 AM
RE: Science against evolution - kim - 23-04-2013, 09:30 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 23-04-2013, 09:20 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Starcrash - 19-12-2012, 08:11 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NoahsFarce - 19-12-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 19-12-2012, 11:21 PM
RE: Science against evolution - NoahsFarce - 21-12-2012, 10:35 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 22-12-2012, 02:39 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 20-12-2012, 06:24 PM
RE: Science against evolution - fstratzero - 20-12-2012, 06:38 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 11:57 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:02 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 12:20 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:22 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:13 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:34 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 12:32 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 16-01-2013, 12:45 PM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 16-01-2013, 01:15 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 19-01-2013, 04:14 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 19-01-2013, 04:44 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 01:22 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 06:09 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 20-01-2013, 10:04 AM
RE: Science against evolution - robotworld - 20-01-2013, 12:03 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 21-01-2013, 02:13 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 21-01-2013, 02:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 01:31 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 16-01-2013, 01:18 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 01:23 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 03:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:29 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:39 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:43 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:36 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 16-01-2013, 02:40 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:41 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:47 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 02:54 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 16-01-2013, 02:59 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:56 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Ape_Linkin - 16-01-2013, 02:57 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 16-01-2013, 03:04 PM
RE: Science against evolution - dj-hato - 16-01-2013, 03:21 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 17-01-2013, 05:49 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:03 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:05 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:14 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:18 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:21 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 17-01-2013, 09:33 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:39 AM
RE: Science against evolution - DLJ - 17-01-2013, 09:24 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 02:56 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:29 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:44 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 18-01-2013, 03:47 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 03:57 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 18-01-2013, 03:12 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vera - 18-01-2013, 03:11 PM
RE: Science against evolution - tkbxb - 17-01-2013, 04:24 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Vosur - 17-01-2013, 09:22 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 17-01-2013, 11:16 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 12:14 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 12:57 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:32 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:50 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 01:58 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:06 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 18-01-2013, 02:07 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:12 AM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 18-01-2013, 02:18 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 18-01-2013, 03:40 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Chas - 18-01-2013, 04:02 PM
Science against evolution - SarnDarkholm - 20-01-2013, 05:54 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Hafnof - 20-01-2013, 06:08 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Question - 20-01-2013, 02:52 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Filox - 21-01-2013, 12:07 AM
RE: Science against evolution - AtheismExposed - 21-01-2013 04:54 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 21-01-2013, 04:57 AM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 21-01-2013, 04:06 PM
RE: Science against evolution - jamiejuggs - 22-01-2013, 09:00 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Bucky Ball - 28-01-2013, 03:05 PM
RE: Science against evolution - Phaedrus - 23-02-2013, 02:58 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 10:11 AM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 04:03 PM
RE: Science against evolution - morondog - 23-04-2013, 04:22 PM
Forum Jump: