So, who will be our next President?
|
|
|
02-11-2012, 11:12 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 10:34 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: You have no proof the "numbers are cooked". If they were "cooking" numbers, they would look FAR better, and they would have started their "baking" a long time ago.Just last month we had the "Jobs Number Conspiracy," they have been cooking the numbers all along - it's what politics is for the incompetent. Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define reality Theism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines reality Atheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully ![]() |
||||
02-11-2012, 11:19 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-11-2012 12:44 PM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 11:12 AM)TrainWreck Wrote:No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it then or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?(02-11-2012 10:34 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: You have no proof the "numbers are cooked". If they were "cooking" numbers, they would look FAR better, and they would have started their "baking" a long time ago.Just last month we had the "Jobs Number Conspiracy," they have been cooking the numbers all along - it's what politics is for the incompetent. No. Do you even know what the process is ? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/busine....html?_r=0 Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
02-11-2012, 11:26 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 11:19 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it hen or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?All right - you win. But the election is going to be fixed, just like we did for George Bush vs. Al Gore. Humanism - ontological doctrine that posits that humans define reality Theism - ontological doctrine that posits a supernatural entity creates and defines reality Atheism - political doctrine opposed to theist doctrine in public policy I am right, and you are wrong - I hope you die peacefully ![]() |
||||
02-11-2012, 12:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
Can somebody get TrainWreck a dose of Thorazine, pretty please?
"Whores perform the same function as priests, but far more thoroughly." - Robert A. Heinlein |
||||
02-11-2012, 12:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 11:26 AM)TrainWreck Wrote:Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again.(02-11-2012 11:19 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote: No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it hen or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?All right - you win. http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-...20598.html Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
02-11-2012, 01:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 12:46 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/28...r-bullshit(02-11-2012 11:26 AM)TrainWreck Wrote: All right - you win.Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again. Vote stealing isn't the only explanation. Stay skeptical my friend. |
||||
02-11-2012, 02:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
(02-11-2012 01:18 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:Thanks !!(02-11-2012 12:46 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote: Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again.http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/28...r-bullshit ![]() Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
03-11-2012, 11:31 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: So, who will be our next President?
It feels a lot closer than it actually should be, and that bothers me a lot. I'm definitely not comfortable, despite Nate Silver's projections having Obama up 3 to 1, 4 to 1, or whatever, statistically.
I do think Obama is going to win. I can't say that is completely unbiased, because I'm only human; but I can say that living in Ohio, I feel our state leaning Obama, on the ground and in polls, enough for him to win. If I'm right about him winning Ohio, then him winning the electoral map, would be extremely likely. The Paradox Of Fools And Wise Men: “The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.” ― Bertrand Russell |
||||
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)