So, who will be our next President?

[TrainWreck]

(02-11-2012 10:34 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  You have no proof the "numbers are cooked". If they were "cooking" numbers, they would look FAR better, and they would have started their "baking" a long time ago.

Just last month we had the "Jobs Number Conspiracy," they have been cooking the numbers all along - it's what politics is for the incompetent.

[Bucky Ball]

(02-11-2012 11:12 AM)TrainWreck Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 10:34 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  You have no proof the "numbers are cooked". If they were "cooking" numbers, they would look FAR better, and they would have started their "baking" a long time ago.

Just last month we had the "Jobs Number Conspiracy," they have been cooking the numbers all along - it's what politics is for the incompetent.

No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it then or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?
No. Do you even know what the process is ?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/busine....html?_r=0

[TrainWreck]

(02-11-2012 11:19 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it hen or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?
No. Do you even know what the process is ?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/busine....html?_r=0

All right - you win.

But the election is going to be fixed, just like we did for George Bush vs. Al Gore.

[Aseptic Skeptic]

Can somebody get TrainWreck a dose of Thorazine, pretty please?

[Bucky Ball]

(02-11-2012 11:26 AM)TrainWreck Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 11:19 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  No. The ex-Chairman of GE accused them of that. There is no proof of it hen or ever. If you actually knew the security in place in Chicago, in the building where they are compiled, it would be impossible to "cook" them. Have you witnessed the process ?
No. Do you even know what the process is ?
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/busine....html?_r=0

All right - you win.

But the election is going to be fixed, just like we did for George Bush vs. Al Gore.

Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again.
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-...20598.html

[TheBeardedDude]

(02-11-2012 12:46 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 11:26 AM)TrainWreck Wrote:  All right - you win.

But the election is going to be fixed, just like we did for George Bush vs. Al Gore.

Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again.
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-...20598.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/28...r-bullshit


Vote stealing isn't the only explanation. Stay skeptical my friend.

[Bucky Ball]

(02-11-2012 01:18 PM)TheBeardedDude Wrote:  

(02-11-2012 12:46 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Unfortunately, I may have to agree with you again.
http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-...20598.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/10/28...r-bullshit


Vote stealing isn't the only explanation. Stay skeptical my friend.

Thanks !!

[TrulyX]

It feels a lot closer than it actually should be, and that bothers me a lot. I'm definitely not comfortable, despite Nate Silver's projections having Obama up 3 to 1, 4 to 1, or whatever, statistically.

I do think Obama is going to win. I can't say that is completely unbiased, because I'm only human; but I can say that living in Ohio, I feel our state leaning Obama, on the ground and in polls, enough for him to win. If I'm right about him winning Ohio, then him winning the electoral map, would be extremely likely.