So, whose forum is this, anyway?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-07-2013, 11:40 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:35 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:31 AM)earmuffs Wrote:  No...
With modern technology they can just rent a womb and let the doctors take care of the icky parts.

Oh, and do you blame gay people? Have you seen a vagina...? eww...

Do you blame me for preferring the vagina? I see my own penis every day. eww...

If it's so disgusting, why not get it removed?

Checkmate straight guys. Drinking Beverage

[Image: 3cdac7eec8f6b059070d9df56f50a7ae.jpg]
Now with 40% more awesome.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:42 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:40 AM)earmuffs Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:35 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  Do you blame me for preferring the vagina? I see my own penis every day. eww...

If it's so disgusting, why not get it removed?

Checkmate straight guys. Drinking Beverage

Cause it's like that ugly mate you had in school. You'd never want to be seen in public with Him but he was great fun back home.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Revenant77x's post
06-07-2013, 11:42 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:40 AM)earmuffs Wrote:  If it's so disgusting, why not get it removed?

Checkmate straight guys. Drinking Beverage

Cause it's like that ugly mate you had in school. You'd never want to be seen in public with Him but he was great fun back home.

I didn't know you were of the gay Rev...

[Image: 3cdac7eec8f6b059070d9df56f50a7ae.jpg]
Now with 40% more awesome.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:42 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:39 AM)cjlr Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:34 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  No no, I exclude technology from "normal" in this case. As in they normally can't reproduce without such help. But as I pointed out, I remembered that they can even do that because nothing is stopping them from actual intercourse with the opposite sex other than the "ewww" factor.

But then even that could be considered not normal. It wouldn't be normal for me to have sex with another man when I'm not attracted to him. So it's not normal for them to have sex with a gender they aren't attracted to for the sole purpose of reproducing.

By the way, I'm glad we have now digressed from pedophilia to focusing on gay activities.

You do realize that the "sex is purely procreative" viewpoint is rather challenged by the frequency of same-sex interaction among countless animal species, yes?

Whoa whoa whoa bucko... slow your role. I never once said sex is purely procreative. I dare not say that.

As rampant as same-sex interactions in the animal kingdom are, that doesn't change the MAJOR point of sex. And that's to reproduce. And it is solely that part I'm focused on.

See what I mean about controversial? This is exactly why I don't say these things in real life. I'll get lynched lol.

“We are all connected; To each other, biologically. To the earth, chemically. To the rest of the universe atomically.”

-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:45 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  Whoa whoa whoa bucko... slow your role. I never once said sex is purely procreative. I dare not say that.

As rampant as same-sex interactions in the animal kingdom are, that doesn't change the MAJOR point of sex. And that's to reproduce. And it is solely that part I'm focused on.

See what I mean about controversial? This is exactly why I don't say these things in real life. I'll get lynched lol.

You said it was only normal if it was - more precisely, you said reproduction was a prerequisite for a "normal" life.

Forgive me for not making much of what seems a very small distinction...

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:50 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)earmuffs Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  Cause it's like that ugly mate you had in school. You'd never want to be seen in public with Him but he was great fun back home.

I didn't know you were of the gay Rev...

Did you ever ask?

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:51 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:45 AM)cjlr Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  Whoa whoa whoa bucko... slow your role. I never once said sex is purely procreative. I dare not say that.

As rampant as same-sex interactions in the animal kingdom are, that doesn't change the MAJOR point of sex. And that's to reproduce. And it is solely that part I'm focused on.

See what I mean about controversial? This is exactly why I don't say these things in real life. I'll get lynched lol.

You said it was only normal if it was - more precisely, you said reproduction was a prerequisite for a "normal" life.

Forgive me for not making much of what seems a very small distinction...

"Homosexuals cannot live a normal life. A "normal" life means they can reproduce. They can't. I'm speaking strictly in terms of biology."

Yes, I said the above. As I said, the thought of them sucking it up and having sex with the opposite sex solely for reproducing had escaped me.

Thus I took note of that small distinction and corrected my statement. Now my new statement would be:

Homosexuals cannot live a normal life. A "normal" life means they can reproduce via without resorting to medical techniques or finding someone who they aren't physically attracted to to have sex with them so they can procreate because none of this is very normal at all. I'm speaking strictly in terms of biology.

Better?

“We are all connected; To each other, biologically. To the earth, chemically. To the rest of the universe atomically.”

-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:53 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:51 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  "Homosexuals cannot live a normal life. A "normal" life means they can reproduce. They can't. I'm speaking strictly in terms of biology."

Yes, I said the above. As I said, the thought of them sucking it up and having sex with the opposite sex solely for reproducing had escaped me.

Thus I took note of that small distinction and corrected my statement. Now my new statement would be:

Homosexuals cannot live a normal life. A "normal" life means they can reproduce via without resorting to medical techniques or finding someone who they aren't physically attracted to to have sex with them so they can procreate because none of this is very normal at all. I'm speaking strictly in terms of biology.

Better?

Oh, it's fine as far as your definitions go!

I just happen to disagree that a precondition for a "normal" life is voluntary reproduction by unassisted means...

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-07-2013, 11:53 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 11:50 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  
(06-07-2013 11:42 AM)earmuffs Wrote:  I didn't know you were of the gay Rev...

Did you ever ask?

Blink



[Image: 3cdac7eec8f6b059070d9df56f50a7ae.jpg]
Now with 40% more awesome.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes earmuffs's post
06-07-2013, 11:56 AM
RE: So, whose forum is this, anyway?
(06-07-2013 10:43 AM)NoahsFarce Wrote:  By the way, I say they both ONLY post about pedophilia because I don't consider simgiran's few posts outside of it as having any sort of significance. I don't like when someone gives me a contrived apology. I don't go around saying they ever apologized to me if all it was, was a fake one.

Simgiran was called out for the two pedophile threads. Then he posts in other sections afterwards? You're counting that? He's said he was an Atheist after being asked. Happenstance. It's not the reason he came here and he even admitted as much. Both came from a Google search about pedophilia.

Wonderful. TTA forums gets good hits for pedophilia. But man-o-man... that porn... I tell you... that's some bad PR.

(06-07-2013 10:42 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  To keep the ideal of total free speech then yes I am willing to deal with the occasional undesirable. As to gaining a reputation for this I think the reaction to the thread had done more to bump view counts and google hits than the actual OP.

As far as a solution I am good with just staying the course. Keeping true to Starks original vision for this place is worth more than appeasing a few people ruffled feathers. "This place is not for everyone." that is basically the unofficial motto around here and if some people find it is not for them that's ok too.

That's fine with me. So now how about you guys make it more transparent. Put that policy up and set it in stone so there are no more future occurrences like this.

"TTA advocates free speech no matter one's affiliation/affliction/disorder/fantasies. You might be offended by some of its content. You have been warned. And please, no porn. That's just distasteful. Eww."

It is plain, read the rules.

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: