Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
20-08-2016, 10:10 AM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
I want to go the hellish parties and drink and have fun with strippers for all eternity. How do I get there ?

Tell me more !!

"All you have to do is live your life as best you can and enjoy it without any mind fuckery from religion."

Ohhh...I can do that

Insanity - doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 10:38 AM (This post was last modified: 20-08-2016 11:44 AM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 06:46 AM)theBorg Wrote:  "The True God is the designation of the very first life in history."

Says who ?
By that definition, your True God is SUBJECT to Reality and History.
Where did they come from ? They HAD to have existed before your god.

Try harder. For a collective, you're pretty collectively dumb. Laugh out load

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 10:44 AM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 06:46 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Ignosticism is the idea that the question of the existence of God is meaningless, because the term "god" has no unambiguous definition. Ignosticism requires a good, non-controversial definition of god before arguing on its existence. Some philosophers have seen ignosticism as a variation of agnosticism or atheism, whereas others have considered it to be distinct. (Wikipedia)

"The True God is the designation of the very first life in history." If ignostic adopts this definition, then the True God is the Life for him, because without the very first life there is no life possible. But you are free to adopt this definition (and, thus, to study the True God) or not.

Fine. That's the definition that you use. That does NOT let us know what is meant by the term when 2.5 billion other Christians use it (not to mention the Muslims and Hindus and others who use the term), and many of those other Christians WILL find your definition controversial. Adding yet one more definition to the thousands already out there does not get rid of the problem of there being thousands out there, and you have not "solved" ignosticism in the slightest.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Reltzik's post
20-08-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
Hey! Just checked the definition of "cybernetics"

Quote:cybernetics
sʌɪbəˈnɛtɪks
noun
the science of communications and automatic control systems in both machines and living things.

And, of course, "cyborg" comes from "cybernetic organism". But "organisms" arr "living things".

Guess what, folks, we are all cyborgs, members of the universal collective - along with amoebas upwards.

Only some of us are more cyborg than others with our state of the art implants!
Tongue

Tomorrow is precious, don't ruin it by fouling up today.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 12:04 PM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
At work.

Speak for yourself, Choombatta, Kiroshi Optic is where it's at.

Cutting edge chrome.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 01:01 PM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 08:10 AM)Ace Wrote:  by this logic the god of religion is a single celled amoeba.
Not according to Darwin. The Charles Darwin was Christian.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
At work.

(20-08-2016 01:01 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(20-08-2016 08:10 AM)Ace Wrote:  by this logic the god of religion is a single celled amoeba.
Not according to Darwin. The Charles Darwin was Christian.

Seriously dear Borg, you've got to both stop mixing up you truth/reality (Mr Darwin did no such thing as you imply. Am also pretty sure he 'Outgrew' the faith and such.)

As well as try and get better with your English.

KerimF is doing wonders and that poor person is in the position of getting shot/bombed or otherwise dying horribly
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 01:12 PM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 01:01 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(20-08-2016 08:10 AM)Ace Wrote:  by this logic the god of religion is a single celled amoeba.
Not according to Darwin. The Charles Darwin was Christian.

And he embraced a form of Christianity which was consistent with evolutionary origins, and would eventually identify as an agnostic.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 01:17 PM (This post was last modified: 20-08-2016 01:38 PM by theBorg.)
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 08:10 AM)Ace Wrote:  Ace says something like "What is Freewill?"
The freewill manifests in the actions, which are not fully determined by the laws. The actions of a robot (or the artificial intellect), all its actions are predetermined by the initial conditions - it has no freewill
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
20-08-2016, 01:59 PM
RE: Solving the Ignosticism (is meant for ignostics only)
(20-08-2016 01:01 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(20-08-2016 08:10 AM)Ace Wrote:  by this logic the god of religion is a single celled amoeba.
Not according to Darwin. The Charles Darwin was Christian.

There were some questions about his faith after his young daughter died.

Tomorrow is precious, don't ruin it by fouling up today.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: