Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
30-04-2015, 12:47 AM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(29-04-2015 09:00 PM)Gilgamesh Wrote:  First, look up the definition of both inference and implication. They are synonymous.

They are not.

I'd suggest that the next time you advise someone to look something up, you undertake that same exercise yourself, first.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Thumpalumpacus's post
30-04-2015, 12:52 AM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(30-04-2015 12:47 AM)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:  
(29-04-2015 09:00 PM)Gilgamesh Wrote:  First, look up the definition of both inference and implication. They are synonymous.

They are not.

I'd suggest that the next time you advise someone to look something up, you undertake that same exercise yourself, first.

Laughat Hehehe... hehehehehe... Thanks for that Smile Ol' Giggly just dun got spanked Big Grin

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
30-04-2015, 05:35 AM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(27-04-2015 01:31 PM)pauloroberts Wrote:  Sucking off 2 men in an alleyway is not what I would call being in touch with her sexuality. Do you think that's classy? Same goes for all the other depraved things she's done.

Her decisions don't have to conform to your expectations.

It sounds like you two have irreconcilable differences and should break up. I'm sure you'll both be happier.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
30-04-2015, 05:38 AM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(30-04-2015 05:35 AM)RobbyPants Wrote:  It sounds like you two have irreconcilable differences and should break up. I'm sure you'll both be happier.

She'll be fine, as she's just a made up figment of OP's imagination. He may need to grieve the loss for a while though.

"The person who is certain, and who claims divine warrant for his certainty, belongs now to the infancy of our species." - Christopher Hitchens

"Remember kids, if you don't sin, then Jesus died for nothing. Have a great day!" - Ricky Gervais
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Eva's post
30-04-2015, 11:35 AM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(30-04-2015 05:38 AM)Eva Wrote:  
(30-04-2015 05:35 AM)RobbyPants Wrote:  It sounds like you two have irreconcilable differences and should break up. I'm sure you'll both be happier.

She'll be fine, as she's just a made up figment of OP's imagination. He may need to grieve the loss for a while though.

I know a gal named Peg who might be able to help him:



Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Thumpalumpacus's post
01-05-2015, 07:31 AM (This post was last modified: 01-05-2015 07:37 AM by kristenkjordan.)
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(27-04-2015 01:31 PM)pauloroberts Wrote:  Sucking off 2 men in an alleyway is not what I would call being in touch with her sexuality. Do you think that's classy? Same goes for all the other depraved things she's done.

Holy shit, man.

First of all, what right do you have that allows you to keep dumping her dirty laundry all over a public forum. I don't give a shit if none of us know her identity, it's still pretty low of you to do. If I found out my boyfriend was talking about my past to other people on the internet, I'd bounce out so fast.

Just because she's done things that you don't necessarily agree with gives you absolutely no right whatsoever to go behind her back and disrespect her like that.

Secondly, everything she's "done?" PAST TENSE. Unless she's doing shitty things behind your back while you guys are dating, you have absolutely no legit reason to get your panties in a twist.

People change. It's a part of growing up. You don't even have an obligation to be the same person you were 5 minutes ago. No one knows how to "life" perfectly and honestly, no one needs to.

At this point, you should really bow out of this relationship for it is YOU that has done her wrong, not the other way around. You can't say you were lured into this relationship under false pretense. Her past is her past and she has absolutely no obligation to divulge anything to you at any point if she so chooses to and the same goes for you (unless of course it's a matter of anything that could directly affect you, like STDs).

We are eternal beings. Endings are not in our destiny.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like kristenkjordan's post
01-05-2015, 05:47 PM
RE: Some thoughts about my girlfriend's sexual past
(29-04-2015 08:34 PM)Gilgamesh Wrote:  
(29-04-2015 06:20 AM)Cathym112 Wrote:  Yes it does. Let me break this down for you in a much simpler analogy.

If I had a picture of Derek Jeter and he left his mark on it, the value of that pic would go up. Meaning that Derek jeter's mark has value, thereby increasing the value of everything he marks. The more Yankee greats that mark that pic (like babe Ruth) the more and more valuable it becomes. But if by marking the pic, he decreases it's value - it means that Jeter and other Yankee greats are worthless, and everything they touch is devalued.

Get it now, moron?

There is no tangible 'mark' left on a woman by a man she has sex with. There is the first time she has sex (sometimes), and that would be a broken hymen. However, the broken hymen has no relation to the thing, or person, that broke it, where as someone's signature does. Your analogy is fallacious.

There are many reasons (I don't know if you can call them that if they're nonsensical - maybe unreasons) why someone would not value a non-virgin, and it doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the man that took the virginity.

Get it now, pleb?

Uh no. Wrong again, bud.
Obviously no analogy is apropos to sex because there is nothing analogous to sex. Just like there is nothing analogous to pregnancy. Stay with me.

If a jacket was worn by say Elvis or Michael Jackson, the value would go up. There is no "mark" on the jacket, just the knowledge that he wore it. That the jacket was at one point around him. Much like a vagina is around a penis.

Get it now, dippy?

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day - Bill Watterson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: