That's Not Evidence
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
14-08-2015, 06:33 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 10:32 AM)Reltzik Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 09:06 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  All I am saying is it quantum mechanics or the theory thereof explains all existence miraculousness God and everything else. Thank you.

(14-08-2015 08:37 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  All scientific theories of the physical realm fall apart whenever you back into quantum mechanics.

... this would include the theory of quantum mechanics.
It is really disheartening to see the most of your arguments along with the rest on this site are based on classical debate tactics used in politics and word games. Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:37 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 01:24 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 10:07 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  All existence is made up of a similar material.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:All of this material is not physical
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:All existence is made up of a similar material.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:and is a vibration
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:All existence is made up of a similar material.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:these vibrations are able to fluctuate in strength
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:All existence is made up of a similar material.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:and harmony
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:making literally anything possible.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
Quote:All existence is made up of a similar material.
[Image: 1390269212824.png]

You're welcome.
Hypothesis of quantization, or
Plancks theory.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:38 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 01:49 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 10:35 AM)RocketSurgeon76 Wrote:  For once, I find this to be a well-thought-out (if not completely thought out, for reasons I will explain) post, and a valid set of points.

However, it is a recognition of the human self-deception nature that caused us to formulate the Scientific Method, specifically to try to eliminate such biases. Where we cannot eliminate those biases, we leave it in the realm of the subjective. That's fine, and that's why we don't have much of an issue with the beliefs of those of us with Christian spouses, or for instance, KingsChosen and his well-spoken blogger brother.

Where we run into a problem is where theists start making assertions of biases in the realm of things we do know by objective means, as commonly found in the Intelligent Design vs. Evolution arguments, for instance.

It's why I have no problem holding to agnosticism as a philosophy to underlie my atheism opinion. I see nothing that suggests to me that a Creator is real or necessary; others feel differently. I cannot say for sure that it is impossible that they are correct, so I withhold judgment. This principle is often known as "non-overlapping magisteria", and I have no particular issue with it (though several do, here on TTA), and it is also why it's possible to be an evolutionary biologist and a Christian at the same time. However, the instant religious philosophy intrudes into the realm of science, it becomes willful intellectual dishonesty, and it will be attacked by all rational people-- including the aforementioned Christian evolutionary biologists (or those who understand what science actually says but are not professionals).

I'm not sure if I'm being too literal, or applying just a dose of reality to any given god concept, but if anyone suggests that god has a finite primate form, that's not possible.

If an alleged god can create a universe, the amount of energy pouring through that finite form would vaporize it. Don't tell me that god can point his finger and have a star form from his mighty hand, all I see is a physical construct that would vaporize from channeling that much energy.

The primitives that formed the Abrahamic god concepts simply did not understand energy or physics. They had no idea how to make an alleged being with that much power make any sense at all.

Though it's really great a being that could channel the energies of a trillion galaxies through his finger would care about whether you picked up sticks on a certain day of a Sumerian derived calendar. Dodgy

The infinitely great reduced to the infinitesimally petty, that's exactly what we'd expect from a bunch of primitives making stuff up.
Its called infinity. Maybe you should look up Planck's theory as well. Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:41 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:38 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Its called infinity. Maybe you should look up Planck's theory as well. Thank you.

Why do you keep saying "Thank you."? Is it something like Heywood's obsession who can't resist any opportunity to display his sanctimonious ego? Is it sarcasm? 'Cause that's only funny for so long.

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
14-08-2015, 06:41 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:37 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 01:24 PM)Chas Wrote:  [Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]
[Image: 1390269212824.png]

You're welcome.
Hypothesis of quantization, or
Plancks theory.

Except that's not what that theory means. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:41 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:37 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Hypothesis of quantization, or
Plancks theory.

You've already demonstrated that you have no clue what quantization is about. What do you think "Planck's theory" is?

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:42 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:41 PM)unfogged Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 06:37 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Hypothesis of quantization, or
Plancks theory.

You've already demonstrated that you have no clue what quantization is about. What do you think "Planck's theory" is?
It is the basis of the hypothesis of quantitation and is related to all existence and its smallest most minut form thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:43 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:38 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Its called infinity.

You know what mind fucks me about infinity? It comes in different sizes. Hobo

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
14-08-2015, 06:44 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:43 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(14-08-2015 06:38 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Its called infinity.

You know what mind fucks me about infinity? It comes in different sizes. Hobo
So are you saying that you do not understand the concept of infinity in either direction? Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2015, 06:44 PM
RE: That's Not Evidence
(14-08-2015 06:42 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  It is the basis of the hypothesis of quantitation ...

Did you mean quantum titillation?

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: