The Blasphemy Thread
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
23-01-2015, 03:57 AM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(04-12-2014 08:00 AM)unfogged Wrote:  I do not have any idea what "blaspheme against the holy spirit" actually means but whatever it is, I'm in.

I`m in, too.
Maybe holy spirit is something like white spirit, but with a better smell?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2015, 12:48 PM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(22-01-2015 10:59 PM)Shadow Fox Wrote:  Jesus was not a carpenter, he was a "lady Carpenter". A well known man whore for his time and the very first one ever! His father would pimp him out to the ugly females of the land for cash. And when the emperor of the land named Jimmy Mcknobblebob anderson the third heard about all this, he got super jelly of jesuses lemon scented penis as it was much bigger then his jew dick. So he sent out his soldiers to go look for him and Jesus's friend Judas whom had just lost a card game with Jesus got mad and told them where he was hiding at because he was a retard with social anxiety issues as a result of being the offspring a talking buffalo a monkey and a beautiful female woman and he couldn't have sex with his mother anymore because of Jesus's Lime scented dick.

So, he went to go tell where Jesus was and they went out and shot Jesus in the head with an square flat arrow made out of egg whites because jesus was completely invinsible and egg whites being fashioned into a flat square arrow was the only way to pierce his body. Jesus died instantly and they strung him up on the cross as a reminder to not have more sex then the emperor and they placed a crown of thornless vines on his head as a gag for he hath no "thorn" to "stick" it to the females anymore!


THAT! my friends is the true story of jesus in the Christian Bible. I have been divinly inspired by this story as God himself has told me this. He came to me and I talked directly to him as he revealed this truth to me!

Prove it didn't happen bitches!

You make a great point in that we can look in the Bible and see where your story differs from the Bible, and that's my point. What God reveals has to line up with scripture.

I'm told atheists on forums like TTA are bitter and angry. If you are not, your posts to me will be respectful, insightful and thoughtful. Prove me wrong by your adherence to decent behavior.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2015, 12:50 PM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(22-01-2015 10:32 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  If you're just talking to the air and nothing happens--this is in my mind now every time an atheist refuses to pray or claims they used to pray in the manner proscribed**** for God to reveal Himself but don't any longer.

****
pro·scribe
(prō-skrīb′)
tr.v. pro·scribed, pro·scrib·ing, pro·scribes
1. To prohibit; forbid: foods that are proscribed by religious dietary laws. See Synonyms at forbid.
2. To denounce or condemn: "The small sins of natural pleasure that we see ... mildly proscribed in the confession manuals of the late Middle Ages" (James Turner).
3.
a. To banish or outlaw (a person): "Emperors took it on themselves to proscribe heretics" (Garry Wills).
b. To publish the name of (a person) as outlawed.

Sorry! I meant prescribed, not proscribed.

I'm told atheists on forums like TTA are bitter and angry. If you are not, your posts to me will be respectful, insightful and thoughtful. Prove me wrong by your adherence to decent behavior.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2015, 12:51 PM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(22-01-2015 04:38 PM)Clockwork Wrote:  
(22-01-2015 03:24 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  1. People who hear the call(s) of God and respond

2. People who hear the call(s) of God and turn away but eventually respond

3. " who continually turn away

And I realize type 3 are here or are here claiming to have not heard any call(s).

But you're not willing to learn that you telling us we're not hearing these calls or lying about hearing these calls makes as much sense as being told you deny the call of Brahma.

I get that you believe in God, but you keep insisting that we're hearing these calls. Yet when we suggest we don't, you say #3 that we "claim" not to hear it.

There are no calls. I'm not sure why that's so difficult to understand.

That is no more difficult to understand than for you to know and understand that if you and some friends haven't yet been called, you shall. Timing is important here.

I'm told atheists on forums like TTA are bitter and angry. If you are not, your posts to me will be respectful, insightful and thoughtful. Prove me wrong by your adherence to decent behavior.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2015, 01:02 PM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(22-01-2015 10:22 PM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  So... finally sitting down at home after working through a 12 hour day in 40' ( C ) heat and 60% humidity. This, Q's post, does not catch me in the best of moods.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  There's a lot going on in this post.

Really? I was trying to be short and concise. Sad Sorry.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  You asked why I'm here if I cannot give you smoking gun evidence (evidence which I say you can choose to accept as factual or not, which is different). I'm here to learn and to teach.

The high-lighted bit. If your evidence is good enough, then it should, by definition, be both factual as well as good enough, should it not?


(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  And while I say I cannot provide you smoking gun evidence, I never said it doesn't exist. Quite the contrary.

Okay then, where is it?

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  For example, I'm wholly unable to provide you with smoking gun/you MUST believe me/absolute court-of-law/scientific proof that I exist,

Actually, I can believe you're a very good Turing program. Which has nothing to say about whether I beieve 'You' exist or not. So there.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  .... But I can certainly affirm it is self-evident to me that I exist!

You can assert it, but given the above there's ground to not believe you.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  Mind you, I can go on and on in denial about how I'm unreal and don't exist, and eventually I'll be committed to an asylum (waiting for cheers and applause from assorted TTA members!).

See my comment above.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  Do you want to go on and on that God doesn't exist or do you want proof?

I don't really care as to whether any gods exist. You're the one with a smoking gun. (Unless... that's a euphemism...? Eeeewwww... )

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  The next logical question is can someone you consider a troll that you may even personally dislike do a better job of proving God's existence than God?

I've never called you a Troll. Only commented on your posts, asked questions and such.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  Do you see why Christians get frustrated (really) when atheists say in the same conversation "YOU prove God exists!"

Again, on I honestly do not about Christians (Of Buddhists, or Muslims, or Hindus, Or Mormons etc who make such claims) Here's the bit you seem to fail to grasp;

They are the ones maing the claims... hence... they are the ones who then have to show something to back up said claims.

That's simply how it works.

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  ... And "NO, I won't pray to God because He doesn't exist and it's beneath my dignity!" If you privately pray to God, the worst that happens is that you are talking to the air... and that's a big deal because... why?

Okay... this last bit? This last comment right here?

That's the comment that has set me off. It's the one that's really made me sit down, ignore dinner and type out this response.

You DO NOT get to be all high and mighty and dismiss other people's search for things.

You do NOT get to post about how useless other people's screams of faith cried out in angst to the wilderness were simply “Not god (Or good) enough.”

Or they some how “Weren't looking for god the right way.”

(22-01-2015 03:32 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  If you're just talking to the air and nothing happens--this is in my mind now every time an atheist refuses to pray or claims they used to pray in the manner proscribed for God to reveal Himself but don't any longer.

Again, how other people have and might have done their searching is NOT something you can dismiss.

In short? Fornicate you and you can do it with the horse you rode in on.

I look forward to, and will accept your apology. Angry

Much cheers to all.

I both apologize for offending you--I sincerely do--and I reiterate that it is my "job" to be forthright with you not just about my heart, but what I understand the Bible teaches.

Without wanting to offend you again, I reiterate that to my understanding the Bible teaches:

*Some have not yet had a call because their call(s) will come later in life

*Some have had a call and reject it because of the stony nature of their will

*I can witness to another the testimony of the evidence I have received, yet such is insufficient to convince anyone in the sense that no evidence on any subject including Christ will FORCE anyone to believe (or disbelieve) as per free will... personally, I find it compelling that at the Simpson murder trial evidence was presented of bloody shoe prints coming from a very expensive, very large pair of shoes that were custom ordered by 3 (?) people on the Earth including OJ Simpson, but that and other evidence does not, and cannot, force any juror to vote for or against their conscience.

Again, I apologize if I offended you making arbitrary claims about the timing and nature of your call(s). Perhaps you fit the category of some people who haven't yet heard that call--and I do not call to question the sincerity of your search, ever. I just tend to lump TTA members into a certain category. I've had this conversation before, too:

*********

*I REALLY prayed when I was ten years old for God to reveal Himself to me...

--Did you give Him a time and date when you prayed for such revelation?

*No, I didn't...

--I'm standing here now telling you that you can be saved, and you need not be religious in any way to be saved. It's a free gift, and I'm unsure it has been explained to you before that it is such, based on the concepts you have brought up about good works, morals, the Law, etc. Could it be possible that my revealing to you the nature of this free gift is the answer to your long-ago prayer?

*No, it isn't. I'm an atheist now, and if you are the answer to my prayer, I reject said answer.

*********

I'm not intending to place YOU in that category per se, but it seems like a lot of the above are at TTA saying the Bible, the only answer, is not the answer. Sorry for being presumptuous. I mean that.[/b]

I'm told atheists on forums like TTA are bitter and angry. If you are not, your posts to me will be respectful, insightful and thoughtful. Prove me wrong by your adherence to decent behavior.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-01-2015, 01:15 PM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(23-01-2015 12:51 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  That is no more difficult to understand than for you to know and understand that if you and some friends haven't yet been called, you shall. Timing is important here.

And ignoring the rest.

Between being insulted and then ignored, why do I even bother.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
27-01-2015, 11:20 AM
RE: The Blasphemy Thread
(23-01-2015 01:15 PM)Clockwork Wrote:  
(23-01-2015 12:51 PM)The Q Continuum Wrote:  That is no more difficult to understand than for you to know and understand that if you and some friends haven't yet been called, you shall. Timing is important here.

And ignoring the rest.

Between being insulted and then ignored, why do I even bother.

Hi,

I reread the last three or four pages of this thread, but didn't yet find where I ignored you. Did you have a question I didn't address?

I'm told atheists on forums like TTA are bitter and angry. If you are not, your posts to me will be respectful, insightful and thoughtful. Prove me wrong by your adherence to decent behavior.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: