The Three Abusers.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
09-01-2015, 08:48 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:45 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:24 PM)earmuffs Wrote:  Red Celt.

Drinking Beverage

That ... was ... brilliant. .... Somebody take the smart pills away from MuffinHead. No good will come of it. Tongue

Was I the only one who thought Red Celt was an alright dude? After all, he made me some sick ass TTA icons/banners.

He did turn sour, but there was a time before that, however brief it might be.

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Atothetheist's post
09-01-2015, 08:49 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:42 PM)Full Circle Wrote:  I’m getting misty-eyed listening to A2 and Muffs go at it.

Group hug! [Image: huddle.gif]

As it stands Woof tendered his resignation over at “the place whose name must not be mentioned” because he says “...this forum consists mainly of TTA stooges...”

I fully expect the Woofmeister back as soon as the temp-ban is lifted, so hold on to your rep points!

Don't listen to this guy...he is being 'watched' on the forum that shall not be named.

He may not be trustworthy. Tongue

See here they are the bruises some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF

We're all mad here. The Cheshire Cat

Are my Chakras on straight?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Anjele's post
09-01-2015, 08:49 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:41 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:36 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  Yeah, other than intentional porn/nudity aka suicide by cop, I don't think that's up to you. Prosecutorial discretion and whatnot. ... And as far as the rules, well you know what I think of rules.

I know it's not up to me. I am saying that I don't want whatever rule-breaking privileges I am "entitled" to.

What you seem to perceive as "favoritism" or "entitlement" is more accurately described as the "general consensus of the value of your presence in the forum." ... Fucking kids these days making it all about them and shit.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
09-01-2015, 08:52 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:49 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:41 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  I know it's not up to me. I am saying that I don't want whatever rule-breaking privileges I am "entitled" to.

What you seem to perceive as "favoritism" or "entitlement" is more accurately described as the "general consensus of the value of your presence in the forum."

It hasn't hurt some people to have friends in high places...and it has hurt some to have not-so-friendly people in high places.

It's a group of people, that stuff happens - no matter what name you put on it.

See here they are the bruises some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF

We're all mad here. The Cheshire Cat

Are my Chakras on straight?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Anjele's post
09-01-2015, 08:53 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2015 08:56 PM by Atothetheist.)
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:49 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:41 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  I know it's not up to me. I am saying that I don't want whatever rule-breaking privileges I am "entitled" to.

What you seem to perceive as "favoritism" or "entitlement" is more accurately described as the "general consensus of the value of your presence in the forum."
Hmm... Maybe.
Let me think on that.

I don't think anyone's value extends to be exempt from punishment because of breaking the rules. Woof's ban wasn't even extended. No real punishment, basically a slap on the wrist.

But again, that's how I see it.

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2015, 08:54 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
Quote:Besides you basically revealing that I indeed had a second account during the drama, you did indeed compromise that.

No.. I just said that you had a sock account...

Quote:However, was it favoritism, or an actual assessment of a scenario or judgement accordingly.

I dunno I wasn't the admin at the time.
I would guess it was both an assessment of a unique situation and favoritism.

Quote:It genuinely sucks that the admins would not have done that for anyone else in need.

I don't know if they would or would not.
But it certainly made it easier for you because the staff all knew about you and your situation and such.
They're not gonna know if some 40 post scrub is telling the truth or not.

Quote:And the dude wasn't banned for being a sock, he was banned for being a suspected sock? I wonder what evidence they used? I wonder why it wasn't conclusive. If the IP matched anyone else, it would have been, so the IP must not have matched anyone. This means they did it purely based on behavior.

It may have matched a university campus or something public like that where multiple people could be on the same network.

Quote:I wonder who it most likely was? And either way, I don't think its fair to punish someone of being suspicious anyways. The only other reason stated was "he was most assuredly a racist cunt.

I asked for information and clarification. I did not receive any information besides that which I researched myself. Naturally, I made a call based on the information I had.

He was suspected of being a sock. He was "punished" because he was on the fence and his behavior is what tipped him over the edge.

I don't see the issue.

Again, you need to remove the pole from your ass. Researching everyone that was banned? fuck off... who does that? leave the mods/admins to do their job. Have you no faith/trust in Stark and Moms? I'm sure the forum was not missing out on striking new glorious information and conversation by Stark banning that "racist cunt". At least action is being taken.

[Image: oscar.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2015, 09:03 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:54 PM)earmuffs Wrote:  
Quote:Besides you basically revealing that I indeed had a second account during the drama, you did indeed compromise that.

No.. I just said that you had a sock account...

Quote:However, was it favoritism, or an actual assessment of a scenario or judgement accordingly.

I dunno I wasn't the admin at the time.
I would guess it was both an assessment of a unique situation and favoritism.

Quote:It genuinely sucks that the admins would not have done that for anyone else in need.

I don't know if they would or would not.
But it certainly made it easier for you because the staff all knew about you and your situation and such.
They're not gonna know if some 40 post scrub is telling the truth or not.

Quote:And the dude wasn't banned for being a sock, he was banned for being a suspected sock? I wonder what evidence they used? I wonder why it wasn't conclusive. If the IP matched anyone else, it would have been, so the IP must not have matched anyone. This means they did it purely based on behavior.

It may have matched a university campus or something public like that where multiple people could be on the same network.

Quote:I wonder who it most likely was? And either way, I don't think its fair to punish someone of being suspicious anyways. The only other reason stated was "he was most assuredly a racist cunt.

I asked for information and clarification. I did not receive any information besides that which I researched myself. Naturally, I made a call based on the information I had.

He was suspected of being a sock. He was "punished" because he was on the fence and his behavior is what tipped him over the edge.

I don't see the issue.

Again, you need to remove the pole from your ass. Researching everyone that was banned? fuck off... who does that? leave the mods/admins to do their job. Have you no faith/trust in Stark and Moms? I'm sure the forum was not missing out on striking new glorious information and conversation by Stark banning that "racist cunt". At least action is being taken.

I don't have faith in anything muffs, I base my own judgements by my own research. It's just what I do. Call that having a pole in my ass or whatever. And I let them do their job. Am I blocking them from doing it? Am I saying they can't? No. I freely admit that they can. I said that multiple times.

And you are right, maybe we wouldn't have learned something, but I am interested in having the conversation. I am always open for changing my mind on any topic. I allow everyone to have their say.

But I don't run this forum, my opinion is skewed without that important perspective.

And now my parents will always be suspicious if they found out that I had a second account on here. So, imagine what they might do to keep themselves comfortable. So I would have liked had that not been made public info. It'll probably amount to nothing, but I would have liked to have been careful, muffs. Do you understand?

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2015, 09:12 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:53 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  Woof's ban wasn't even extended. No real punishment, basically a slap on the wrist.

Hell, I'd be tempted to excuse the remainder of his sentence for bad behavior. Big Grin He's horny to get back. Mom's already told him he's gonna be on a short lease with a choke collar and battery clamps clipped to his balls and shit.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like GirlyMan's post
09-01-2015, 09:12 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 08:48 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:45 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  That ... was ... brilliant. .... Somebody take the smart pills away from MuffinHead. No good will come of it. Tongue

Was I the only one who thought Red Celt was an alright dude? After all, he made me some sick ass TTA icons/banners.

He did turn sour, but there was a time before that, however brief it might be.

I seem to remember the same thing. I had nothing against him. I'm sort of "out of it" with respect to some of the personal things here, I don't pay a lot of attention to some of the bickering, (not that it's perfectly justified in each case), and I know I purposely antagonized Gordo, as I don't like people patronizing us), but also ("oh oh") I never had a problem with Woof. He was nice to me. Meh. But I never followed what was going on with him and TTA.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-01-2015, 09:15 PM
RE: The Three Abusers.
(09-01-2015 09:12 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(09-01-2015 08:53 PM)Atothetheist Wrote:  Woof's ban wasn't even extended. No real punishment, basically a slap on the wrist.

Hell, I'd be tempted to excuse the remainder of his sentence for bad behavior. Big Grin He's horny to get back. Mom's already told him he's gonna be on a short lease with a choke collar and battery clamps clipped to his balls and shit.

Well, if that's the case.... Evil_monster

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Atothetheist's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: