The circular argumentation revisited
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
12-08-2016, 12:22 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 10:45 PM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Borg is typing in another language...
We are special. See "she speaks in a language, nobody knows":


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 12:40 AM (This post was last modified: 12-08-2016 12:43 AM by Mathilda.)
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 09:24 PM)diddo97 Wrote:  What I became was not good. I felt constantly angry, almost getting to the point of wishing death on people. I felt like I knew with absolute certainty that I was going to hell, which meant that nothing I did mattered. The story of Jesus meant nothing to me. I thought that I must choose hell to be a good person.


I'm so glad to see that you are better. I have deleted the negative rep I gave you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 12:54 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
Seriously, where do all the asshats like this one come from? I wish i had seem s single time someone who could even make a proper argument, or make his ideas clear. Instead we get a bunch of babbling idiots who think they are the smartest thing since sliced bread.

Is there a website with "ideas that make you think you are insanely smart, but look insanely retarded to anyone else"?

Since it seems that i was wrong guessing "poe" with pasadi97, i fear this idiot is also very real.

Ceterum censeo, religionem delendam esse
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 01:54 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
You may find this informative Borg ...



Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 04:01 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 10:03 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  They make the same statement, only the grammar is different.

The sky is blue.
Blue is the colour of the sky.

Identical statements with words in different order.
No, I am sorry: The sky is the seen atmosphere, it is often blue. The blue is the color in the white-light spectrum, e.g., sometimes the sky appears blue.

The same way: temperature is the parameter of the "thermal energy" of a system, which is measured by thermometer, hereby thermometer is the device from Metrology, designed to measure the temperature.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 04:15 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(12-08-2016 01:54 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  You may find this informative Borg ...
Thank you, dear lady. The expert in video has no idea what time is and can not even measure the damn thing. I can and I do, so I am much happier. The Land of Confusion, is not my land:


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 04:45 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 09:48 PM)theBorg Wrote:  Einstein: "the time is a physical object, which is measured by clock."

Citation required for where Einstein said that time is a physical object

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 04:57 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
At work.

Well. I don't fault Borg's taste in music.

It's their atrocious lack of skill in English which is what seems to make any interaction with them pointless.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 05:15 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(12-08-2016 04:45 AM)unfogged Wrote:  Citation required for where Einstein said that time is a physical object
I simply read the Einstein's definition of time "between the lines". The word "time" is the projection of an event on the time-axis of spacetime, latter is background for any current physical system. The time measured by the clock.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
12-08-2016, 05:20 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(12-08-2016 04:57 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  any interaction with them pointless.
It is not my fault either: I have just different level of clearness. See: a human, being used to hear fuzzy speeches of the politicians, could feel unused to the logical and normal text of theBorg.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: