The circular argumentation revisited
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
10-08-2016, 09:32 PM (This post was last modified: 10-08-2016 09:40 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:29 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 02:11 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  time is not only what a clock can measure.
The clock is designed for measuring the time, because its scale shows: 1 AM, 2 AM, ... 1PM, 2 PM... the values of time.

I like "the values of time". Not sure what to make of it yet but it sounds intriguing.




#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
10-08-2016, 09:39 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 06:51 PM)Esquilax Wrote:  to throw the entirety of science into the same category?
Yes, the circular reasoning could be not a fallacy. See: "the temperature is that what the thermometer measures, and the thermometer shows the temperature."

The same way in Creationism: "The living objects exist, because God thinks so, and the God exists, because He is very first life in history."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:42 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 07:04 PM)Dom Wrote:  Which are these atheists of whom you speak?
The perfect atheists of the future, but current atheists are too confused by TV Media.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:43 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:29 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 02:11 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  time is not only what a clock can measure.
The clock is designed for measuring the time, because its scale shows: 1 AM, 2 AM, ... 1PM, 2 PM... the values of time.

No shit Sherlock. Your point is what ?
Your analogy is still false, and you statement about the Bible is a non-sequitur.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:46 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 03:52 PM)Mathilda Wrote:  You have no understanding of what science is.
Please read my papers in top scientific journals: use name Dmitri Martila in Google search. Are you the German leader Angela Merkel?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:48 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:39 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 06:51 PM)Esquilax Wrote:  to throw the entirety of science into the same category?
Yes, the circular reasoning could be not a fallacy. See: "the temperature is that what the thermometer measures, and the thermometer shows the temperature."

The same way in Creationism: "The living objects exist, because God thinks so, and the God exists, because He is very first life in history."

I like you. I want to keep you and hug you and cuddle you.

[Image: Bear_Hug_by_CommodoreElfman.jpg]

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:49 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:32 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  I like "the values of time". Not sure what to make of it yet but it sounds intriguing.
The time is a thing. The table is a thing. You would measure the table by a ruler (the meter), the numbers are written on the ruler. The time is a thing and can be measured by clock. The clock contains the written on the scale numbers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:53 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:49 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 09:32 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  I like "the values of time". Not sure what to make of it yet but it sounds intriguing.
The time is a thing.

"Thingness" is not a property that is easy to measure.

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 09:55 PM (This post was last modified: 10-08-2016 10:19 PM by theBorg.)
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 12:06 PM)JDog554 Wrote:  most adapted from other religions.
Your comment is adapted from debunked YouTube videos "Zeitgeist".

According to the Church the God gave the knowledge to the pagans too. So, it is not strange, what other religions contain some amount of the Verity. The religion, which contains the maximum of the Verity is the True Religion.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
10-08-2016, 11:22 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(10-08-2016 09:39 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(10-08-2016 06:51 PM)Esquilax Wrote:  to throw the entirety of science into the same category?
Yes, the circular reasoning could be not a fallacy. See: "the temperature is that what the thermometer measures, and the thermometer shows the temperature."

The same way in Creationism: "The living objects exist, because God thinks so, and the God exists, because He is very first life in history."

It's always fallacious. Always, without exception. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: