The circular argumentation revisited
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-08-2016, 11:12 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
At work.

(11-08-2016 11:10 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 09:21 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  Therefore any one thing, whether abstract, an action or something physical has a boundary. If your god has no boundary then he is no one thing, he is nothing.
State it by the standard paradox: "can God create the stone, which He can not lift?"
As you feel, this is absurd. The absurd tries to eat our brain out. Therefore, one must fight for own sanity. The way is following: "The God can do all, except to harm Himself."

Dear Borg.

Please define your deity. There seem to be a lot of them.

Thumbsup
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Peebothuhul's post
11-08-2016, 11:19 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:12 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Please define your deity. There seem to be a lot of them.
The very first life on the planet in history.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:22 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
At work.

(11-08-2016 11:19 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:12 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Please define your deity. There seem to be a lot of them.
The very first life on the planet in history.


So..... you might worship something along the lines of 'Stromatalites' then?

Consider

I can grokk that. Thumbsup
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Peebothuhul's post
11-08-2016, 11:24 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:19 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:12 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Please define your deity. There seem to be a lot of them.
The very first life on the planet in history.

Which planet? The borg have a vast awry planets to be possibly referring to.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:34 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:10 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 09:21 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  Therefore any one thing, whether abstract, an action or something physical has a boundary. If your god has no boundary then he is no one thing, he is nothing.
State it by the standard paradox: "can God create the stone, which He can not lift?"
As you feel, this is absurd. The absurd tries to eat our brain out. Therefore, one must fight for own sanity. The way is following: "The God can do all, except to harm Himself."

I am just exploring the logical consistency of the very concept of an unlimited god. The fact that there is a paradox in that an unlimited god could not do something that cannot be undone means that the concept is logically inconsistent. And even you agree that your god is limited in that he cannot harm himself. And referring to your god as 'He' also limits the concept further. Why not refer to your god as she or it?

Your very concept of what a god is, is logically inconsistent and absurd. Therefore it is correct to assume that it cannot exist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Mathilda's post
11-08-2016, 11:37 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:22 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  So..... you might worship something along the lines of 'Stromatalites' then?
This does not debunk my definition of the True God.

Why there is no huge memorial for the very first living Darwinian cell? The source of all life, in the fantasy of Darwinists, must be respected on the highest international level!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:38 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:19 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:12 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  Please define your deity. There seem to be a lot of them.
The very first life on the planet in history.

You mean that your god is a simple transitory pattern of molecules and energy flows on the edge of chaos that has a metabolism and competes with others to feed off a thermodynamic gradient?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:40 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:24 AM)ClydeLee Wrote:  Which planet? The borg have a vast awry planets to be possibly referring to.
The Christians would be happy with Earth, but you can take any planet: the first life in Universe am our True God.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:40 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
At work.

(11-08-2016 11:37 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:22 AM)Peebothuhul Wrote:  So..... you might worship something along the lines of 'Stromatalites' then?
This does not debunk my definition of the True God.

Why there is no huge memorial for the very first living Darwinian cell? The source of all life, in the fantasy of Darwinists, must be respected on the highest international level!

? The what now ?

We're moving on from talking about deities and moving into biology?

Colour me very confused. Consider
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:41 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:40 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:24 AM)ClydeLee Wrote:  Which planet? The borg have a vast awry planets to be possibly referring to.
The Christians would be happy with Earth, but you can take any planet: the first life in Universe am our True God.
The Mormons won't be

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: