The circular argumentation revisited
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-08-2016, 11:44 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:38 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  You mean that your god is a simple transitory pattern of molecules...
Our definition guides us to further conclusions: 1) True God exists, 2) True God am source of all life.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 11:45 AM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
At work.

Other than the 'Stromatalite' referance, you're doing a poor thing of defining your dety, Borg.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 12:19 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:44 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:38 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  You mean that your god is a simple transitory pattern of molecules...
Our definition guides us to further conclusions: 1) True God exists, 2) True God am source of all life.

Explain.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:44 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:38 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  You mean that your god is a simple transitory pattern of molecules...
Our definition guides us to further conclusions: 1) True God exists, 2) True God am source of all life.

If your god exists, you should have hairy palms by now.
..
.
.
..
...did you just watch your palms? If you believe in your god, you just should have checked.

Ceterum censeo, religionem delendam esse
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 01:34 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 11:37 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Why there is no huge memorial for the very first living Darwinian cell? The source of all life, in the fantasy of Darwinists, must be respected on the highest international level!

What the hell is a Darwinian cell?
Why do you place the source of all life at a cell?
By the way, "Darwinist" is a thing only to theists. Nobody who understands even the basics of evolution by natural selection and Darwin's contribution to the science worships him in any meaningful sense of the word.

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 01:53 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 12:19 PM)Mathilda Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 11:44 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Our definition guides us to further conclusions: 1) True God exists, 2) True God am source of all life.

Explain.
Definition:
The FFF is the very first life in history.

Consequences:
1) The FFF does exist, 2) The FFF am the Life: without it no life is possible.

Now, simply write down FFF=GOD. Scary, isn't it?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 01:53 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 12:19 PM)Mathilda Wrote:  Explain.
Definition:
The FFF is the very first life in history.

Consequences:
1) The FFF does exist, 2) The FFF am the Life: without it no life is possible.

Now, simply write down FFF=GOD. Scary, isn't it?

And you see a value to talking here using that definition of "god" why?

Since hundreds of millions of people use the terms God/Gods to mean nothing of the sort of a definition of "first life in history"

What goal is accomplished by this being stated in this manner?

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 02:45 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
Okay,... but I fail to see how this 'FFF" equals 'Deity'?

Consider

We're back to some arbitrary thing.

I'm asking more for the "What can the deity do?" not "What is the deity's hair colour." kind of thing
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 02:52 PM (This post was last modified: 11-08-2016 02:55 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 01:53 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 12:19 PM)Mathilda Wrote:  Explain.
Definition:
The FFF is the very first life in history.

Consequences:
1) The FFF does exist, 2) The FFF am the Life: without it no life is possible.

Now, simply write down FFF=GOD. Scary, isn't it?

Now simply write down FFF = the Fabulous Furry Freak brothers and it ain't scary no more. More like hippie dippy trippy, Skippy.

[Image: fff.jpg]

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-08-2016, 03:56 PM
RE: The circular argumentation revisited
(11-08-2016 01:53 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(11-08-2016 12:19 PM)Mathilda Wrote:  Explain.
Definition:
The FFF is the very first life in history.

Consequences:
1) The FFF does exist, 2) The FFF am the Life: without it no life is possible.

Now, simply write down FFF=GOD. Scary, isn't it?

WTF is FFF???
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: