The "classifications" of science
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
01-03-2015, 12:42 PM
RE: The "classifications" of science
(01-03-2015 12:28 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(01-03-2015 10:10 AM)Anjele Wrote:  Makes sense to me. There are several who come here because they like to hear themselves talk and every other forum has given them the boot.

Have you met CartilageoftheWild or some of the others who talk to themselves on a regular basis?

Maybe the ignore function needs a 'select all' option. Tongue

"Cartilage-for-a-Brain"... Tongue

There would indicate there is a brain involved...the jury is out on that.

See here they are the bruises some were self-inflicted and some showed up along the way. - JF

We're all mad here. The Cheshire Cat
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
01-03-2015, 03:20 PM
RE: The "classifications" of science
(01-03-2015 05:57 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  There is no such thing as "immutable parent science".
Science is a METHOD. By definition it's not immutable.

That.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: