The worst argument against a Archaeopteryx
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
13-03-2014, 04:45 PM
RE: The worst argument against a Archaeopteryx
(13-03-2014 04:44 PM)Full Circle Wrote:  
(13-03-2014 03:24 PM)ThePaleolithicFreethinker Wrote:  Its not that he said the neck is broken, but he said that the neck broke from the base of the head and then attached its self magically to the back of the head, 7 times.Facepalm

Gasp OK...go ahead and faceplam as hard as you like...Facepalm Laughat

Laugh out loadLaugh out loadLaugh out load

[Image: Guilmon-41189.gif] ♪僕は恐怖の一定した状態に住んで、不幸、逃すもう?僕は、それはもう痛いときも気づかないと
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-03-2014, 10:29 PM
Re: The worst argument against a Archaeopteryx
So those clawed hands and feather features just fit perfectly sans head.anyway?

People are good at rationalizing, even if they're actually REALLY BAD at rationalizing.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: