Top 21-30(+) Creationist Arguments
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
03-01-2015, 12:12 PM
RE: Top 21-30(+) Creationist Arguments
(03-01-2015 05:05 AM)morondog Wrote:  
(03-01-2015 02:59 AM)Ace Wrote:  besides that doesn't answer my questino on what the deluded nut would say in response to my question,, besides deleting it

If you wait, I'm sure a deluded nut will be here soon to answer it Yes

One which I hear quite a lot from a mate of mine is "You assume there is no God, therefore whenever something happens you assume there's a natural explanation and therefore find no evidence for God"... I'm a bit unsure how to answer this TBH. Like... why the fuck would I assume there was an invisible being doing random shit?

Earthquake -> There must be a person doing it, it's not like plate tectonics is a thing... But I can't see them.

Therefore Earthquake -> Invisible person doing it. QE fucking D Rolleyes

I think you have a real good answer right there.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-01-2015, 12:37 PM
RE: Top 21-30(+) Creationist Arguments
(03-01-2015 11:53 AM)Ace Wrote:  
(03-01-2015 06:54 AM)ClydeLee Wrote:  Where is the God has provided me sufficient knowledge for knowing his existence and that he did x.

here's a video on how people managed to establish direct communication with god :







now watch the video while I do some stuff *carefully sneaks behind ClyddLee with a mallet* Yes Laugh out load

The religious go on about the "evidence" from their god, but then use all of the techniques of a snake oil salesman to convince us of their "truth".

[Image: snakeOil.jpg]

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-01-2015, 02:31 PM (This post was last modified: 03-01-2015 02:39 PM by Bear100.)
RE: Top 21-30(+) Creationist Arguments
(03-01-2015 07:02 AM)Ace Wrote:  Non-Sequiturs

p1. X is possible or exists or is true
p2. blah blah blah
c. therefore Y is true/exists

example:
p1. the US is a nation
p2. the founders were christians
p3. majority of american citizens are christians
c. therefore the US is a christian nation

now its time to play with it
replace the word christian with anything like:
men, obese, smelly, british, pirate, bacon Drooling

(03-01-2015 08:03 AM)morondog Wrote:  
(03-01-2015 07:02 AM)Ace Wrote:  Non-Sequiturs

p1. X is possible or exists or is true
p2. blah blah blah
c. therefore Y is true/exists

example:
p1. the US is a nation
p2. the founders were christians
p3. majority of american citizens are christians
c. therefore the US is a christian nation

now its time to play with it
replace the word christian with anything like:
men, obese, smelly, british, pirate, bacon Drooling

Consider

The US is a nation
The founders were obese smelly British pirate bacon-eating men.
Therefore the US is an obese smelly British pirate bacon-eating men nation.

Sounds legit Smile



Bechased

I like the example that thunderf00t gave, I think it was in one of his "why do people laugh at creationists" video.

1. Object pushed forward travels faster
2. Can of spam is an object

Therefore can of spam traveling at speed of light will move faster than the speed of light.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-01-2015, 02:46 PM (This post was last modified: 03-01-2015 02:50 PM by Ace.)
RE: Top 21-30(+) Creationist Arguments
(03-01-2015 12:37 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  
(03-01-2015 11:53 AM)Ace Wrote:  here's a video on how people managed to establish direct communication with god :







now watch the video while I do some stuff *carefully sneaks behind ClyddLee with a mallet* Yes Laugh out load

The religious go on about the "evidence" from their god, but then use all of the techniques of a snake oil salesman to convince us of their "truth".

[Image: snakeOil.jpg]

consider the following experiment Tongue


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Ace's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: