Trump v. Francis - The Battlecam in the Vatican
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-02-2016, 02:31 PM
RE: Trump v. Francis - The Battlecam in the Vatican
(19-02-2016 02:13 PM)Dom Wrote:  
(19-02-2016 01:48 PM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  Are we talking about the literal walls around Vatican City? Because those were built explicitly to keep people out, specifically Italian monarchs who wanted to kill the Pope.

Yes, and that was then and now is now. Now the Vatican has an inclusionary wall, and Trump wants an exclusionary wall between the US and Mexico.

It's very inclusionary. They wouldn't want the little boys escaping. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Chas's post
19-02-2016, 03:13 PM
RE: Trump v. Francis - The Battlecam in the Vatican
(19-02-2016 02:31 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(19-02-2016 02:13 PM)Dom Wrote:  Yes, and that was then and now is now. Now the Vatican has an inclusionary wall, and Trump wants an exclusionary wall between the US and Mexico.

It's very inclusionary. They wouldn't want the little boys escaping. Drinking Beverage

Lol, bad choice of words. Tongue

I was just pointing out that talking about these two walls is like talking about apples and oranges. While the Vatican has opened theirs up, Trump wants his to close things off. There is a big difference there.

Not defending either side, just comparing walls.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-02-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Trump v. Francis - The Battlecam in the Vatican
(19-02-2016 03:13 PM)Dom Wrote:  
(19-02-2016 02:31 PM)Chas Wrote:  It's very inclusionary. They wouldn't want the little boys escaping. Drinking Beverage

Lol, bad choice of words. Tongue

I was just pointing out that talking about these two walls is like talking about apples and oranges. While the Vatican has opened theirs up, Trump wants his to close things off. There is a big difference there.

Not defending either side, just comparing walls.

Big Grin

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-02-2016, 08:42 PM
RE: Trump v. Francis - The Battlecam in the Vatican
(19-02-2016 03:13 PM)Dom Wrote:  
(19-02-2016 02:31 PM)Chas Wrote:  It's very inclusionary. They wouldn't want the little boys escaping. Drinking Beverage

Lol, bad choice of words. Tongue

I was just pointing out that talking about these two walls is like talking about apples and oranges. While the Vatican has opened theirs up, Trump wants his to close things off. There is a big difference there.

Not defending either side, just comparing balls.

fixt.

Please tell is more about your in-depth research! Tongue

[Image: 0013382F-E507-48AE-906B-53008666631C-757...cc3639.jpg]
Credit goes to UndercoverAtheist.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: