U.S. military and it's past interventions.
|
|
|
06-12-2012, 08:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote:(06-12-2012 07:54 AM)I and I Wrote: http://www.countercurrents.org/lucas240407.htm Yes they were. Al Qaeda is the US. It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness ![]() ~Izel |
||||
06-12-2012, 08:44 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote:All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions?(06-12-2012 07:54 AM)I and I Wrote: http://www.countercurrents.org/lucas240407.htm |
||||
06-12-2012, 09:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Re: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
OP is a butthurt hipster who prob says dumb shit like"imperialist bullies" like every 8 words to his boyfriend.
![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 10:08 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:44 AM)I and I Wrote:Korea, for one. That was the U.N.(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote: The numbers are still outrageous. That 'study' ascribes to the U.S. deaths that were not caused by U.S. incursions.All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions? Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 10:41 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 10:08 AM)Chas Wrote:88 percent of the international forces on the side of South Korea were U.S. soldiers. Sounds kinda like bush's "coalition of the willing" giving the semblance of a multi nation attack on Iraq when in reality it was a U.S. led and U.S. desired war and U.S. mainly conducting the operations.(06-12-2012 08:44 AM)I and I Wrote: All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions?Korea, for one. That was the U.N. next ![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 02:13 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 10:41 AM)I and I Wrote:You miss the point. The U.N. was in charge, not the U.S.(06-12-2012 10:08 AM)Chas Wrote: Korea, for one. That was the U.N.88 percent of the international forces on the side of South Korea were U.S. soldiers. Sounds kinda like bush's "coalition of the willing" giving the semblance of a multi nation attack on Iraq when in reality it was a U.S. led and U.S. desired war and U.S. mainly conducting the operations. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 03:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-12-2012 03:34 PM by Logica Humano.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
The U.N Security Council unanimously supported a United Nations Armed Policing Action for the ultimate defense of Seoul.
Tell me, I and I, where do you live in the United States? Occasional TTA returner then leaverer. |
||||
06-12-2012, 03:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
lets not support the Security Council too much, they're not the most... fair UN body there is
![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 07:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 03:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote: The U.N Security Council unanimously supported a United Nations Armed Policing Action for the ultimate defense of Seoul.88 percent of the fighting force were U.S. troops, how does this not mean it was a U.S. incursion into another country? So if you guys believe that the U.S. comprising 88 percent of the fighting force is somehow not a U.S. incursion into another country, then explain who invaded Iraq in 2003? According to Bush it wasn't the U.S. but it was a "coalition of the willing". Some people will twist things any way they can to make the U.S. not look like an imperialist douche bag. Fucking please ![]() |
||||
06-12-2012, 07:34 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 09:43 AM)TheBlackKnight Wrote: OP is a butthurt hipster who prob says dumb shit like"imperialist bullies" like every 8 words to his boyfriend. (06-12-2012 07:02 PM)I and I Wrote:I hope that was on purpose.(06-12-2012 03:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:Some people will twist things any way they can to make the U.S. not look like an imperialist douche bag. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)