U.S. military and it's past interventions.
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-12-2012, 08:04 AM
U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 07:54 AM)I and I Wrote:  http://www.countercurrents.org/lucas240407.htm


Drinking Beverage


The numbers are still outrageous. That 'study' ascribes to the U.S. deaths that were not caused by U.S. incursions.

Yes they were. Al Qaeda is the US.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of Calvinism is that good Atheists do nothing." ~Eric Oh My
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 08:44 AM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 07:54 AM)I and I Wrote:  http://www.countercurrents.org/lucas240407.htm


Drinking Beverage


The numbers are still outrageous. That 'study' ascribes to the U.S. deaths that were not caused by U.S. incursions.
All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 09:43 AM
Re: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
OP is a butthurt hipster who prob says dumb shit like"imperialist bullies" like every 8 words to his boyfriend.

[Image: funny-American-eagle-meme.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 10:08 AM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 08:44 AM)I and I Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 08:03 AM)Chas Wrote:  The numbers are still outrageous. That 'study' ascribes to the U.S. deaths that were not caused by U.S. incursions.
All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions?
Korea, for one. That was the U.N.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 10:41 AM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 10:08 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 08:44 AM)I and I Wrote:  All are results of U.S. interventions. Which ones on the list do you not believe should count as U.S. interventions?
Korea, for one. That was the U.N.
88 percent of the international forces on the side of South Korea were U.S. soldiers. Sounds kinda like bush's "coalition of the willing" giving the semblance of a multi nation attack on Iraq when in reality it was a U.S. led and U.S. desired war and U.S. mainly conducting the operations.

next

Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 02:13 PM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 10:41 AM)I and I Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 10:08 AM)Chas Wrote:  Korea, for one. That was the U.N.
88 percent of the international forces on the side of South Korea were U.S. soldiers. Sounds kinda like bush's "coalition of the willing" giving the semblance of a multi nation attack on Iraq when in reality it was a U.S. led and U.S. desired war and U.S. mainly conducting the operations.

next

Drinking Beverage
You miss the point. The U.N. was in charge, not the U.S.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 03:30 PM (This post was last modified: 06-12-2012 03:34 PM by Logica Humano.)
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
The U.N Security Council unanimously supported a United Nations Armed Policing Action for the ultimate defense of Seoul.

Tell me, I and I, where do you live in the United States?

[Image: 4833fa13.jpg]
Poonjab
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 03:36 PM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
lets not support the Security Council too much, they're not the most... fair UN body there is

[Image: sigvacachica.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 07:02 PM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 03:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  The U.N Security Council unanimously supported a United Nations Armed Policing Action for the ultimate defense of Seoul.

Tell me, I and I, where do you live in the United States?
88 percent of the fighting force were U.S. troops, how does this not mean it was a U.S. incursion into another country?

So if you guys believe that the U.S. comprising 88 percent of the fighting force is somehow not a U.S. incursion into another country, then explain who invaded Iraq in 2003? According to Bush it wasn't the U.S. but it was a "coalition of the willing". Some people will twist things any way they can to make the U.S. not look like an imperialist douche bag.

Fucking please Rolleyes http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2862343.stm
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-12-2012, 07:34 PM
RE: U.S. military and it's past interventions.
(06-12-2012 09:43 AM)TheBlackKnight Wrote:  OP is a butthurt hipster who prob says dumb shit like"imperialist bullies" like every 8 words to his boyfriend.

[Image: funny-American-eagle-meme.jpg]

(06-12-2012 07:02 PM)I and I Wrote:  
(06-12-2012 03:30 PM)Logica Humano Wrote:  
Some people will twist things any way they can to make the U.S. not look like an imperialist douche bag.

Fucking please Rolleyes http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2862343.stm
I hope that was on purpose.

[Image: US-Olympic-Misconception.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes TheBlackKnight's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: